In Houston, black teen steals, kills store clerk; grand jury dismisses all charges

In the lawless shithole of Houston a 17-year-old black--Mario Young--went into a convenience store and stole a bag of chips.

The 42-year-old clerk noticed and followed him outside, calling for him to come back and pay.

Minutes later Young fatally shot the clerk.

Yesterday a Houston grand jury voted dat duh po' teen shouldn't be charged fo' shootin' duh clerk, cuz he thought duh clerk might have had a gun.  The clerk was unarmed, and no gun was found in his car.

The Harris County DA had originally charged the killer, but apparently the grand jury vote overrules that.  The grand jury ruling means the killer won't even be charged with some lesser homicide like "wrongful death."  

So now, in Houston, if a member of a "protected" group steals something from a store and is pursued, the thief can shoot the clerk and get off *without even being inconvenienced by a trial*--by claiming he thought the clerk had a gun.

Can anyone explain why the perp wasn't even charged with "negligent homicide" or "wrongful death"?

Anyone care to predict the result of this ruling?

Source.

https://www.fox26houston.com/news/houston-crime-suspect-no-billed-in-murder-of-gas-station-clerk-over-bag-of-chips