A few observations as we start the fourth year of the disaster of biden

As we approach the end of the third year of the ghastly disaster of Porridgebrain's reign, thought I'd take a stroll thru some headlines for ya.

*Colorado SC ordered Trump off the ballot, claiming this was commanded by the 14th Amendment.  The state GOP replied that in that case it would scrap primary voting and replace with a caucus (making ballot ban a nullity).  SC then stayed its own order.

*Maine's leftist SecState (female) ordered Trump removed from that state's ballot *by decree.*  In both states, legal scholars think there's a silly legal principle called "due process," and in the case of the decisions in Colorado and Maine, there wasn't any.

*Fauci testifies to congress, admits the "stay six feet apart" command was simply invented--pulled out of someone's ass w/ no science behind it.

*Fauci says "I can't recall" over 100 times.

*After bleating ever since the chyna virus appeared that it could not possibly have been made in a lab,  and then secretly asking a dozen scientists to write a paper (published in The Lancet) saying this, Fauci now admits the lab theory is "credible" and "not a conspiracy theory."  Wow, total reversal.

*Anyone remember a guy named Ray Epps?  Big tall guy, can't miss him.  Wearing a red Trump hat.  Caught on camera the night before J6, in the center of a big crowd, yelling at 'em "Tomorrow we need to go INTO the Capitol."  He repeated, "INTO the Capitol."
    Crowd members smelled a rat and started chanting "Fed! Fed! Fed!"  Next day he's caught on crystal-clear video again urging members of the crowd to storm the cops on the capitol steps.
    Despite his unique, direct role in urging going INTO the Capitol, Epps was NOT on the list of people the DOJ wanted to question about events that day.  
    He was never charged, even though hundreds of others who didn't go into the building were jailed for over two YEARS without being offered ANY bail (violation of Constitution) and later sentenced to two years.  But not Epps.
    Later Epps sent an email to his nephew saying "I instigated the whole thing."
    Finally, with the Internet beginning to point out the obvious fix, the J6 committee called Epps as a witness.  He supported the Democrat/FBI/DOJ line all the way.  He was finally charged, went to trial and was found guilty.  Should have been sentenced to two years.
   Instead he got no jail time at all, $500 fine.  The damn DOJ prosecutor actually had a slideshow prepared claiming Epps had really tried to de-escalate the situation. 
   That claim was utter horseshit, but equally telling was that the prosecutor already had the slideshow prepared trying to exonerate him.  Clear proof the fix was in--thus that J6 was a "false-flag operation by the government.

*National debt now $34 trillion.

*Manhattan lib Judge Engoron, presiding over Trump civil fraud trial, ordered that Trump not be allowed to speak in closing arguments in court.  Unprecedented.

*Hamas demonstrators blocking traffic on interstates, and entrances to airports in LA and NYC, and bridges and tunnels to Manhattan.  Virtually no arrests--just as in the BLM riots and arson of 2020.
   Now, unless you live in NY or LA or Seattle you weren't inconvenienced by these blockages.  But when the regime doesn't arrest them ALL, it encourages others to do the same.  Meaning eventually...

*In Colorado an illegal, deported four times but here yet again (i.e.illegally entered five times), was convicted FIVE times of DUI in Colorado. But each time he was released by a Boulder county judge without being sentenced to jail. The judge also refused to honor a known ICE "detainer" to deport the guy again (though it clearly isn't keeping the son of a bitch from coming right back).
   So with this as background, can anyone predict what happened next--inevitably?
   Sure: Driving drunk yet again, he crossed the centerline and killed an innocent mother and son.  Thanks, Democrats.
   Of course almost no one was related to the mom and son he killed, so Democrats just shrug their shoulders.  "Dude, shit happens every day, eh?  Get over it."

*Related: In December 302,000 illegals entered the U.S.--highest one-month total ever.  For the 3 years biden's been in, over 7 million illegals have entered--many have been flown to cities far from the border.  Now they can't be found except by chance.

*IF you trust the CDC, then according to the CDC itself, 158,000 more Americans died last year than expected from historic data.  And that total only includes up *until* September, because when the total started to get "politically risky" the CDC *pulled those numbers off its website!*  So the true figure is likely to be over 200,000.  
    Regime shills: "WAIT!  Dis can't be true!  Or okay, maybe it's true, but there's gotta be a great, logical reason for it!  Uh...'traffic accidents!' 'Plane crashes!'  'Alcohol poisoning!'  'Fentanyl!"
    The CDC bureaucrats need not worry.  Just tell Americans it's a math error.  It's nearly impossible to check the govt numbers anyway, so no one will be able to prove you're lying.

*More numbers: the Bureau of Labor Statistics issues a "jobs report" on the 1st Friday of every month.  If the report claims lots of jobs were created it makes the stock market jump several hundred points.  
   This week the BLS admitted they *overestimated* the number of jobs created in 2023 a bit:  Actually by 438,000.   
   Anyone know how many jobs have been needed to be created every month to stay even with unemployment?  Sure ya do, guys!  225,000 or so.  So dividing the overcount by 12 we find an average of about 37,000 jobs per month that the biden regime claimed were  created weren't--a consistent error of 16% high.  That error would boost the stock market a LOT.  Think that might have been planned?
   Also, in most months a "great" report--say 180,000 jobs claimed created--will be "revised" the next month--always downward, often by a huge amount.  Last fall one month that was first touted at 180,000 was revised down to 100,000 or so.  Wow.
   Point is, the economy is on life support.  Yes, the stock market is doing great.  But labor force participation is barely 60%.

*A year or so ago the U.N. rammed through a "Global Plandemic Treaty" (sp?) giving the U.N. dictatorial powers to order every signatory nation to do anything the UN commands.  All the kool kidz signed on, cuz...POWER!
   That's a done deal.  So now the WHO (a UN agency) is working quietly to *expand* the scope of the treaty to include "climate change" (formerly Global Warming, since the causal agent is supposedly the greenhouse gas CO2, which heats but doesn't cool).
   Note the cunning WHO-shits:  Dey don' say dey *changing* duh treaty, cuz dat might cause nations dat signed it to say dis new push to let it rule "climate change" (formerly Global Worming) wuz a whole new deal, meaning nations could press for changes or refuse to sign.  Instead duh UN bureaucrats are merely "expanding it."  See?  So settle down, proles!
   If history is any guide (and only a fool would say it isn't) this too will be a done deal, and the biden regime will keep the U.S. on-board.
   That means the Democrats will now be able to smirk innocently that "We're not taking away your jet travel, or gas-powered cars, or home heating!  No no no no, citizen!  It beez duh UN dat's doin' it!  We dindoo nuffin!"
   Well, except sign the damn treaty in the first place.  And suddenly the same people who are absolutely fine with the biden regime violating U.S. immigration laws, and BLM for burning cities and looting, will be all pious: "We simply *must* obey the terms of this treaty," they'll sniff, "After all, we're a nation of laws, are we not?  So we must obey."
   Wait, you assholes who allowed BLM to burn down cities, who allowed Hamas supporters to block airports and interstates and tunnels--suddenly claim you're all for law and order?  GFY.

*As you all surely know, plants need nitrogen, and with few exceptions they have to get it from the soil.  Raising crops removes nitrogen from the soil, so farmers add nitrogen fertilizer.
  The Netherlands is the most productive food exporter in Europe per person and per unit of land.  But as all of you surely know, the Warmies are now trying to force Dutch farmers to kill half their dairy cows and stop using nitrogen fertilizer.
   They're doing this because some fertilizer gets turned into N2O, which duh warmies say is a ("deadly") "greenhouse gas."  So naturally the Warmie/wokiez *demand* nitrogen fertilizer be banned!
Any guesses on what that will do to food production...and prices?  
   The wealthy won't be hurt, but poor Americans will be...which means congress will give out hundreds of billions more in food stamps and welfare to compensate.  And where does that show up--in a way that *will* hurt?
   Raises the national debt faster.  Hmmm...

BTW: If you believe "greenhouse gases" are causing Global Warming, what gas do ya think is the biggest contributor to the "greenhouse effect"?  I'm betting all of you say CO2.
   Actually the gas responsible for more keeping the planet warm (thus liveable) is...wait for it...water vapor.
   Virtuall all the "sciencey" papers totally ignore it.  NOAA has a webpage listing the "major greenhouse gases" and doesn't mention water vapor.  Hmmm...
   The reason all the government and university scientists ignore water vapor is that 75% of duh Erf's surface is water, and there's no way to stop the sun from turning trillions of tons of the stuff into vapor every day.  So since they can't figure out how to change that (and make you pay for it), they carefully ignore it, and wail about the stuff they *can* guilt you into paying outrageous amounts to try to reduce Global Warming.  Got it?
   Eventually their demand to control every aspect of your lives, and to make you pay for impoverishing yourselves, will eventually end (50 years from now?), but not before trillions of dollars have been utterly wasted and governments have been overthrown. 

Now take a look at duh official NOAA website (below) that purports to list the gases in the atmosphere:

As you see above, NOAA say dey gonna show you duh gases in duh atmosphere, eh?  Wait, where's water vapor?  They didn't even LIST water vapor when they claimed to "show you" the gases that make up the atmosphere.  Then WAY down at the bottom they try to justify this by saying DRY desert air has ZERO water vapor.  Wait, how often is air that dry, eh?
   But finally the great gruberment Sciencey types admit--seemingly reluctantly--that yes, water vapor often comprises "3%" of the air.
   Democrat: "SEE, dat not much, eh?  Three compared to 420 for CO2!  So water vapor is nuthin'!"
   Wait...all but four of the other figures are in "parts per million."  Not one American in a thousand knows how to convert percentages to ppm, eh?
   But of course you do, cuz you're educated, right?  So what's 3% in ppm?  Take as long as you need.
   For the math-challenged, you take 3/100 and multiply top and bottom by 10,000, which should give you 30,000 ppm.
   Thirty-*thousand.*  Roll that around for a minute: CO2 is 420 ppm now (no idea why the NOAA site says 350.  Guess no one is paying attention.  Wow, shocker.)
   Methane (CH4), which the tyrants are ALSO trying to ban, is a microscopic 1.7 ppm--insignificant next to CO2, let alone water vapor.
   The amount of N2O--the thing the Warmies are trying to BAN fertilizer for producing!--is only 0.31 ppm, way less than one one-thousandth of the amount of CO2--which in turn is less than one-seventieth (1/70) of the amount of water vapor.  So there's over 70,000 times more water molecules in the air than N2O--and yet the communists (which is what they really are) who run the UN and EU and our universities are wailing that N2O is such a HUGE threat that they DEMAND that farmers in Europe stop using fertilizer!

Wanna see another example of how the regime misleads ya?  Take a look at the figure below, titled "Atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases":
 

The title would clearly induce a rational adult to believe the list was indeed a list of...um... greenhouse gases!  Of course.  Ooohhh, but don't overlook that subtitle: "...the levels of *major* greenhouse gases..."  See, that could change things, eh?

Nope.  No other construction is possible to a rational adult than that this list contains the "major greenhouse gases."

The five gases mentioned are CO2, methane, nitrous oxide, "halogenated gases" and ozone.  Agreed?

Notice anything missing from dis list claiming to be THE "major greenhouse gases" from duh faaabulous, honest, "we nevah mislead ya, proles" EPA?

Is water vapor on the EPA's list of "major greenhouse gases"?  

No.  But if you go 40 paragraphs deeper, you find this:

Long after everyone has stopped reading, the EPA finally notes that "Water vapor is the most abundant greenhouse gas in the atmosphere."  But note that they carefully avoid giving you any numbers to let you compare.  That's intentional.

Then they say "Human activities have only a small direct influence on...water vapor, primarily through irrigation and deforestation, so is not included in this indicator.

Let's unpack this: human influence on atmospheric water vapor is 0.00000001, if that.  Compare the area of irrigated land to ocean surface area just between 50 degrees south and 50 north.  Less than one part in 100 million.  So irrigation has virtually no effect on increasing water vapor in the air.
   Similarly, the EPA's claim that "deforestation" is one of the causes of increasing water vapor in the air isn't true.  Just the opposite: on a hot, dry day a full-grown tree loses hundreds of gallons of water to the air due to opening pores ("stomata") to take in CO2, releasing oxygen and...water vapor.  So cutting down trees should reduce the amount of water vapor in the air.  But deforestation sure sounds convincing, eh?
   But the real hoot is the EPA's claim that because human activities don't change the amount of water vapor in the air measurably (true) "it is not included in this indicator."
   That's called a non-sequitur: the conclusion doesn't follow from the assumptions.  They just didn't want to tell you the relative effect of water vapor on global warming, compared to the carefully-selected scapegoats CO2, and now methane and nitrous oxide.
   There's over 70 times more water vapor in the air than CO2.  Yet the regime ignores one and screams bloody murder about the other--and N2O, even though there's 70,000 times more water vapor in the atmosphere than N2O.  But since no one can do anything about the water vapor...
   There's over 70,000 times more water vapor in the air than nitrous oxide...and yet pols in the Netherlands are DEMANDING that dairy farmers in their country kill half their dairy cows to cut this KILLER greenhouse gas...when they can't do shit about the water vapor!
   Oh wait...the EPA quickly notes that human emission of other greenhouse gases is causing the planet to warm, which makes more water evaporate, thus making warming accelerate!  They call it a "positive feedback loop," which is a real thing and often causes problems.
   So after totally ignoring water vapor earlier (when it listed "the major" greenhouse gases), suddenly they note the major, killer role of water vapor--but only because *human activity* is causing the planet to warm, which is making more vapor, eh?
    So suddenly water vapor is a huge factor, huh?

Really?  Here's how a PhD explains why we should ignore real measurements and go with his theory: "Decreases in low-altitude tropical water vapor in...ground-based observations before around 1993 are considered suspect based on inconsistency with simulations."
   Got it?  This pencil-neck wants you to consider actual measurements--from reality--"suspect" because...wait for it...it's inconsistent with his "simulations" (i.e. a computer model).  His Hahvahd education didn't teach him that "models" have to correctly predict real life, rather than reality needing to follow some model.  (In which case, which one?)

Y'all are smart, but very few people are solid in thermodynamics or atmospheric physics, and if you're not, you're easy for the lying bureaucrats to fool.  You don't have the background to know when what they're telling you is utter, brazen bullshit.
   Like Fauci claiming Covid wasn't modified in the Wuhan lab to make the harmless-to-humans bat virus lethal, when in fact *he used taxpayer money to fund that work.*  We've got the damn grant number, on a report published in 2015 by the chief of the Wuhan team thanking Fauci's agency for funding a huge breakthrough (splicing a single, harmless gene into a virus)!

   Now, I don't have kids, so I only care about the U.S. going socialist or communist in the same way you'd care if a magnificent, unique piece of sculpture was destroyed by a mob.  But if *you* have kids, you *should* care...a LOT--because the pols running your government are consigning your kids to a much harder life than you've had.  And so far they've won every point (largely by electing Democrats as fake Republicans in solid GOP districts; very impressive).

If those of you who love freedom and your relatively comfortable lifestyle wanted to, you could defeat the pols who are killing the country.  But of course you don't believe any of what you've just read is true, so...
   You don't believe it's true NOT because you have research that contradicts it, but because you intuitively believe the greedy, corrupt pols and their Media allies are telling you the truth.
   So you'll continue to pay for stupid shit like battery-powered cars--and to cheer for morons who're banning fertilizer on Europe's most productive farms.  
   The real hoot is that *intellectually* you know very well that joe biden isn't on your side.  He's the guy who claimed (on live TV) *"If you take the vaccine you can't get covid!"*
In December of 2020--just as the jab was being approved--he said "Vaccination will NOT be mandatory."  That lasted just two months.
   But despite your intellectual knowledge of the truth, you *unconsciously default to believing the regime and the Media*--simply because it's literally *unthinkable* to you that they'd lie.

As they say, "Denial ain't just a river in Egypt," eh?

*Any of you recall what the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere is?  How about water vapor?  Just checking.