Trannies prevent an invited speaker from giving an "annual memorial speech" at Commie Uni

A basic principle of totalitarian regimes is that they don't allow free speech.

Of course they brazenly lie and claim they totally support free speech: citizens are allowed to say how happy they are under the regime and how great the economy is, and how thrilled you are to have been assigned an 800-square-foot apartment by the rulers.  But saying anything critical of the ruling regime  lands you in a "psychiatric facility," or you "fall" from a tenth-floor hotel window.

Most Democrat politicians and virtually all college professors and members of the Mainstream Media are barely-disguised communists.  One of the clearest signs is that they strongly oppose freedom of speech, while virtuously bleating that they really, really support it.

[That's another dead-giveaway sign of communists: claiming to support something that's the exact opposite of a politician's true policies.]
 
There are literally thousands of examples in which university adminishits and professors--communists all--have allowed communist students to prevent invited speakers from speaking--that is, to prevent freedom of speech from people the communists disagree with.  Student demonstrators are allowed to pack the venue, then blow whistles, ring cowbells and use bullhorns to prevent those they oppose from speaking.

Democrat/university adminishit: "NOOooo, we really, reeeeeally support freedom of speech.  But of course not in this case, cuz freedom of speech is NOT 'absolute,' right?  'Hate speech' isn't allowed!  And of course anything we don't like is 'hate speech'!"

See how that works?  It's a perfect circle, totally internally consistent.

SO...on September 8th students at a shitty college--runs, of course, by communists--were allowed to block an annual "memorial speech, given this year by a professor from Princeton.

The motto of the memorial speech is always "The truth-seeking mission of the university."

Ironic, eh?

Students blew whistles, blared music thru bullhorns and yelled to prevent the invited speaker from speaking.  And as always, it worked.

In a rational society the students would be handcuffed by cops and and hauled off to jail for an obvious violation of the speaker's civil-rights.  But since the adminishits who run the damn place are communists, they don't take any action at all against the violators.

Of course the college's adminishits harumph their pro-forma disapproval, but never take any disciplinary action against any of the student disruptors.  Which tells you the adminishits actually approve--cuz if they didn't, they'd expel the communist demonstrators.

The president of the college claimed he had no idea about any of this, or else he would have acted.

Hahahahahaha!  Just kidding.  That POS, Mike Sosulski, was in the audience.  Didn't say a word.  Did he agree with the anti-free-speech students, or was he just scared to oppose 'em?  No reporter has asked, or will, cuz there's no benign answer: either he supports the anti-free-speech thugs or he's scared to order his armed, muscled cops to handcuff and remove 'em.

The local Dem-run paper said "campus police reportedly decided not to intervene to ask the students to leave because they did not want to escalate the situation."

Horse shit.  Campus police never make those decisions unless they wanna be fired.  Instead they do whatever the adminishits order--which in this case was "Do nothing."

So why were the students determined to prevent the speaker from speaking?  A spokesman for the commie adminishits said “the students took issue with homophobic and transphobic statements the speaker has made in the past.”

Ah, so the spokescommmie implies trannies and fags, as usual.  And the story in the local paper indicated the real protesters were trannies, since homosexuals are beginning to realize trannies are hurting the Cause.

Okay, so did any "reporter" ask why the protesters were allowed to prevent the speech by someone whose views they didn't like?

Hahahahaha!  Of course not.  Neither the "reporter" for the local paper nor anyone else asked.  Not that it would have done any good, of course, because you wouldn't have gotten a straight answer, because the truth is that the adminishits a) agree with the trannies; and b) know that by allowing free speech they'd lose face with adminishits at other universities.  Can't admit any of that, eh?  Too revealing.

But even though no reporter asked, the position of the adminishits was revealed by an adminishit with the title of "director of student engagement," who said he was proud of the protesters.  That pyrsyn was Antoine Jordan, who self-identifies as "queer" and is paid $185,000 per year to bleat shit like that.  Cuz he beez a "director," eh?

To try to save face with critics, a different spokeswhore bleated that the "disruption" “is not consistent with the core values of Washington College.”

Ohhh my, sounds SO virtuous, eh?

But recall that the university president, in the audience, didn't tell his campus cops to haul off the speech-blockers.  Which allowed the protesters to silence speech they didn't like.

The pattern is all too familiar.  At Stanford Law School students were allowed to block a speech by judge Stuart Duncan.  The female dean of the law school later objected to the studen action but refused to discipline a single student, despite video identifying many.

Northwestern University has been consistently ranked as one of the worst university’s for free speech. Students previously succeeded in cancelling a speech by former U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions.  A communist student named Zachery Novicoff stated the commie position beautifully: "Old racist white dudes aren't allowed to speak.”

The president of Northwestern (Morton Schapiro) denounced what he called “absolute” free speech, instead claiming that speech his party members didn't like was actually a form of assault.

Members of Black Lives Matter, the Immigrant Justice Project, the Queer Trans Intersex People of Color and Rainbow Alliance organized to stop other students from hearing from an invited ICE representative, thanks to the crucial help of adminishit "Dean of Students" Todd Adams, who said protesters screaming profanities would be allowed into the lecture "if they promised not to disrupt the class."

Hahahaha!  Could the adminishit really be that stupid?  Well, if not stupid at least on the side of the student shits.  And as soon as the protesters were allowed into the classroom, they prevented the ICE representative from speaking.  Anti-free-speech students won again.

A student communist insisted that speakers they didn't like needed to be silenced because they “terrorize communities and profit from detainee labor."  

So Northwestern had the names of the students who disrupted an actual classroom, but elected to do nothing.

The communists cunningly claim that forcibly preventing speech they don't like is perfectly legal because...wait for it...the preventers are simply exercising their own freedom of speech.  See, comrade?  We have freedom to block your speech using our own freedom of speech.  But don't you dare try to use that argument against *us*!

University presidents are supposed to be smart people.  If so, they can't possibly be unaware that allowing the mob to block any speech the mob doesn't like effectively ends freedom of speech.  But of course that may actually be their goal.

Source: Turley   Source: the local Dem paper

https://jonathanturley.org/2023/09/13/washington-college-allows-protesters-to-cancel-event-with-princeton-professor/

https://www.stardem.com/news/local_news/protesters-silence-renowned-speaker-at-washington-college/article_997b9cfa-4f4b-11ee-902b-573058135ae8.html