Shill leftist org Associated Press writes clever propaganda to protect World Economic Forum

The Associated Press is a leftist shill site, so it fawns over he corrupt World Economic Forum now meeting in Davos., giving it the headline: "As elites arrive in Davos, conspiracy theories thrive online." 

Notice the emphasis:  Not on the ghastly elites who want you to eat insects while they continue to dine on the most costly steaks, but on "on-line conspiracy theories."  So right away you know you're looking at propaganda.

The shills at the AP continue, 

"Now, in increasingly mainstream corners of the internet and on conservative talk shows, 'The Great Reset' has become shorthand for what skeptics say is a reorganization of society, using global uncertainty as a guise to take away rights. Believers argue that measures including pandemic lockdowns and vaccine mandates are tools to consolidate power and undercut individual sovereignty." 

There's so much utter horseshit packed into that 'graf that it's hard to grasp.  First the AP sets the stage by saying any "skepticism" comes from "conservative talk shows."  First, to morons on the Left, the term "conservative talk shows" is a psychologically-loaded term that tells "sophisticated" leftists (which they all believe they are) that anything said in such forums (which the AP is getting ready to tell you) is a wacky conspiracy theory that no rational person could believe. 

The Left has even managed to turn the formerly neutral term "skeptic" into a pejorative:  Thus we have "global-warming skeptic," and "vaccine skeptic" to denote people who are supposedly "Science deniers," or the equally dismissive inference that skeptics refuse to "listen to the Science."

So the AP writes that "skeptics say" the Great Re-set" is a "reorganization of society," leading readers to conclude that it's NOT a "reorganization of society."  

Except that's a totally accurate description of what the WEF wants to accomplish.  Don't take my word for it — take Klaus Schwab's:  In his book "COVID-19: The Great Reset" he claims the book

"...is a guide for anyone who wants to understand...what changes will be needed to create a more inclusive, resilient and sustainable world going forward. ... [T]he purpose of this book [is] to... show the deficiencies...in our global system...."

Ah, "what changes are needed," eh?  "Deficiencies in our global system," ya say?  Sounds like a total reorganization to me.  Alleged "deficiencies" and "needed changes" probably explains that grandiose title "The Great Re-set," eh? 

But ol' Klaus and the other oh-so-smaht "elites" at the WEF have detected...shall we say, a bit of unexpected resistance among "ordinary people," so they enlist their shills at the AP to quickly assure wanna-be "elite" Democrats that anyone who disagrees with the alleged "necessary changes" is a right-wing domestic violent extremist" or some such. 

==

Here's another AP article showing the trick:

On the internet, social media users claimed leaders [just "leaders"??  No further identification?  Interesting] wanted to force the population to eat insects instead of meat in the name of saving the environment.

The annual event in the Swiss ski resort town of Davos, has increasingly become a target of bizarre claims from a growing chorus of commentators who believe the forum involves a group of elites manipulating global events for their own benefit.  Experts say what was once a conspiracy theory found in the internet’s underbelly has now hit the mainstream."

Wow, that's well done! "What was once a conspiracy theory found in the internet's *underbelly* has now hit the mainstream."  Haven't seen "underbelly" used by propagandists in a long time, but it's a perfect example of using vivid imagery to discredit opponents' ideas.

“This isn’t a conspiracy that is playing out on the extreme fringes,” said Alex Friedfeld, a researcher with the Anti-Defamation League who studies anti-government extremism. “We’re seeing it on mainstream social media platforms being shared by regular Americans. We're seeing it being spread by mainstream media figures right on their prime time news, on their nightly networks.”

That entire paragraph is horseshit.  A lie.  The Mainstream Media has totally fawned over the "elites" in the WEF, and has carefully ignored any mention of their stated goals--which unequivocally include drastically cutting the consumption of meat, since the "elites" claim humans eating any form of meat worsens "global warming" by producing more greenhouse gases.

Problem is, if government DECREES force ranchers and other meat-producers to cut their herds and flocks, as the Netherlands has already done, meat prices will unquestionably skyrocket.  In a shortage, users bid up prices.  (If your professor or parents don't think so, put me in touch with 'em.)

It's a thing you so-called "elites" constantly ignore, called "the laws of supply and demand."  It's not that y'all don't know those laws, just that you don't allow the Mainstream Media to inform moronic voters about them.  Which is how you get voters to vote against their own interests--voting to support your DECREES that will make meat to expensive for them to afford.  

They didn't take Econ at Hahvahd.  You did, and your actions in conning them into voting against their own interests is criminal. 

So when your "brilliant" policies result in meat becoming too costly for us commoners to afford, where do expect us to get protein, eh?  The answer "Well you're just shit out of luck" would result in a hail of sniper fire aimed at your lying, thieving, scum-sucking heads, so you have a ready answer:

"Good people who care about Global Warming will eat fake meat, made from soy.  Or insects.  Yes, bugs are *great* sources of protein, citizen!  You should try 'em!"

Yep, that's a great prepared answer.  But when the Media tested it on focus groups, for some reason that idea didn't play as well as the WEF had hoped.

Wow, shocker.  Seems like people preferred eating bacon and steak and chicken to insects.  Who could have predicted that, eh?  

Ooohhh, said WEF rulers, what to do now?  Got it: We simply get our shills in the Mainstream media to *imply* that any claim that we ever urged that is simply a "conspiracy theory" from the "underbelly of the internet."

That's SO cool!  See, if we at the WEF flatly denied saying it, some deplorable would drag out some video showing we actually did.  But this way it doesn't matter much if the video surfaces cuz we didn't deny saying it.  It's all on the Media.  And they do the same thing: "We didn't say the WEF never said it, we just said it was "a popular conspiracy theory from the underbelly of the internet," and then let readers draw their own conclusions from that.  See?"

Welcome to propaganda 101, folks.