How woefully inaccurate "models" of plandemic deaths helped pols lock down entire nations

In December 2019 and January of 2020 the U.S. Mainstream Media was *constantly* broadcasting footage from Wuhan, China, of people being dragged out of their homes into police vans because of a virus called SARS-Covid-2.

The endless videos, and the dire predictions by shills like Fauci, triggered a panic: predictions of a global pandemicthat the experts screamed would kill most of those who got the virus.  (Interestingly, Fauci is on video in 2016 predicting that "There will be a global pandemic in the first year of Trump's term.")

The Media constantly compared this new virus to the 1918-19 Spanish flu epidemic that killed an estimated 50 million worldwide.  And the "experts" warned that if governments didn't lock down the entire nation, this new epidemic would probably kill lots more than the flu.

One of the men leading these dire warnings was Neil Ferguson, PhD.  His team at Imperial College in London predicted millions of deaths in the UK just in the first year unless the government ordered a strict lockdown.

Governments all over the world listened.  After all, he was a PhD, and they're never wrong.

Real-world data eventually discredited Ferguson’s models, but the damage was done. Lockdowns, quarantines, masking, poorly-tested EUA products - such as experimental vaccines have taken their toll on all of us.

The plandemic gave government health bureaucrats something they loved: power and attention.  The entire apparatus of the state eagerly joined, loving the new power--and the vastly increased budgets.

Just one problem: Ferguson’s models were crap, as shown by his predictions in two earlier "epidemics:"

In the "bird flu" [avian flu?] epidemic of 2005, Ferguson predicted that up to 150 million people might die.

The actual number was...282, worldwide, between 2003 and 2009.

Then in 2009 Ferguson tried again with the outbreak of Swine Flu, predicting 65,000 people could die from the Swine Flu outbreak in the UK.

Again he was a bit high: the final figure was below 500.  
These huge misses in earlier predictions should have shown that his politicians were garbage, and pols shouldn't have paid any attention.  But of course pols saw the plandemic as a way to seize more power.  And politicians definitely love power.

So they jumped on Ferguson's scary predictions--helped by Fauci and Birx.  Fauci is definitely corrupt.  Birx is just incompetent and a coward.  Fauci was so, so quick to sneer at HCQ as a cure, and later he had a hand in preventing doctors from prescribing ivermectin, then going even further to bar Americans from obtaining it.

Fauci has likely pocketed millions from Pfizer.

And here's where it gets even crazier:  Some Democrats are claiming that the only reason Ferguson's dire predictions didn't come true was because Democratpols listened to him, locked everyone down (destroying the economy and costing the government almost a TRILLION dollars in lost tax revenue and "covid payments") and then ordered everyone to take the vax--which the CDC assured us was both Safe and Effective (when it was neither).

Now we find a very large study shows that the survival rate for the entire population under age 60 was 99.97%.  For those under 40 it was 99.995%.

As you could have guessed, this very large study, showing virtually no benefit from forcing those under 40 to take the jab, has been totally ignored by the Mainstream Media.

Interesting.