Yesterday yet *another* Court of Appeals rejects biden vax mandate; Mainstream Media didn't saw a word about it!

As everyone should know by now, back in September biden gave a speech in which he bleated "My patience is wearing thin," and that he had ordered OSHA to issue a RULE (Order) that every company with 100 or more employees must force all those employees to either take the jab or be fired.

It was totally unconstitutional, but that has NEVER stopped Democrats.

Three weeks ago the 5th Circuit issued a "stay," ordering the bidenfail regime to not enforce the unconstitutional "mandate" until a full trial could be held on the issue.

Regime members scoffed that this was a trivial obstacle, and that they were confident the regime would win at trial.  And that companies should proceed with forcing all employees to take the jab or be fired, even though this was no longer being forced by da regime.

Some of you can already see what's about to happen, but let's go on.

Lots of parties had sued to halt the grotesque, brazen overreach of the "mandate," so with lawsuits pending in many other circuits, the Supreme Court randomly picked one circuit that would hear the matter--the 6th Circuit, in Ohio.

Two weeks ago OSHA filed an "emergency motion to dissolve the stay," asking the new circuit court of appeals to let government continue to ORDER companies to force employees to take the jab or be fired.

OSHA also asked the court to transfer the case to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals.  This was crucial because a majority of the judges on the DC circuit are TOTALLY corrupt.  We know this because when the "Justice Department" that was persecuting Michael Flynn admitted the FBI had reported Flynn did nothing wrong, and said they were dropping the charges against Flynn, the DC circuit **refused to drop the charges.**

As noted, a majority of the judges on the DC circuit are totally, thoroughly, irredeemably corrupt.  So if the trial on whether the "vax or be fired" mandate went to the DC court, that court would certainly support the regime.

So yesterday (December 3rd) the 6th issued its ruling:  They slapped down the regime in no uncertain terms, denying OSHA's request to dissolve the stay imposed by the 5th circuit, and also denying the request that the case be moved to the (corrupt) DC circuit.

This is a HUGE defeat for the regime.  So you'd think the story would have led all the evening newscasts the day it was issued, right?  After all, every time a judge stayed an order issued by Trump--even something as obvious as a travel ban from terror-supporting countries--the Mainstream Media would trumpet that at the top of every newscast.

So did the Mainstream Media put *this* defeat for the regime they love at the top of the "news"casts yesterday?  Google "6th circuit denies OSHA motion" and see what you find.  As of noon today (Saturday), **not a single mention by any U.S. mainstream media outlet.**

The U.K's Daily Mail had the story, but not a single U.S. outlet.

CNN, MSNBC and others had stories about OSHA asking the 6th Circuit to reinstate the mandate, but not a word after the 6th denied the regime's motions.

So where does that leave us?  If you work for a company that's demanding that you take the jab or be fired, and you don't want to take the ineffective, dangerous "vaccine," a good strategy (if you have the resources to be out of work for a few months) would be to refuse, and refuse to report weekly test results to your employer (brazen violation of HIPPA law).  Then it they fire you, hire an attorney to send a "formal demand letter" to your former company, threatening to sue if you're not immediately re-hired, with back pay.

You need to understand that the "mandate" was never a law, and never legal.  The regime never had the authority to ORDER what it ordered.  Companies went along because they knew OSHA would sue any company that refused to enforce the order.  Corporate attorneys know that the government has unlimited money to sue any company for years, so they were sure it was far less risky to fire employees who refused the jab than it was to buck the power of the biden regime.

But now, after two resounding legal defeats for the regime's mandate, company attorneys are beginning to realize the ORDER they've been threatening to enforce is unconstitutional--meaning companies that fired employees are looking at a huge financial liability if all fired employees sue for wrongful termination, intentional infliction of emotional distress, slander and everything else a good plaintiff's attorney can think of.

Of course companies will claim they believed the mandate was legal, so they can't be held responsible for "acting in good faith."  But if you were corporate counsel, would you advise your company to risk trial?

Facing the possibility of losing a class-action that could cost millions, I predict most companies will offer to settle for re-hiring fired employees, paying back wages and ten thousand for the emotional distress.

It'll be interesting to see how this unfolds.

Source.

https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/breaking-6th-circuit-denies-biden/