Amazing: FDA has a "Director of Social Media"--who pressured Google to remove a video the FDA didn't like

Hey, citizen, did you know the damn "Food and Drug Administration" has a "director of social media"?

The sumbitch is probably paid $150,000 a year to do...what?

Hard to say, but we know who he is--Brad Kimberly--and we know of at least one thing ol' Brad has done:  He emailed Google (which owns YouTube) demanding that Google remove a video the agency didn't like.

Seriously.  So why did the FDA want YouTube to remove the video?  Did it tout ivermectin?  HCQ, perhaps?  Nope.

In an email dated April 30, Kimberly told a Google lobbyist that the agency "expected" YouTube to remove a video favorably reviewing the then-new monoclonal antibody treatment for Covid.

Wait...aren't monoclonal antibodies one of the only two officially-approved treatments for covid?  (The other being Fauci's kidney-killing Remdesivir.)

Yes, but it doesn't matter, citizen, cuz the FDA didn't like it, didn't want Americans to watch it, and that's the end of what passes, in our rulers, for a "discussion."

“Overall, the video is very problematic when it comes to COVID misinformation,” Kimberly wrote to the lobbyist, Jan Fowler Antonaros. “This video *should be pulled.”*

Sure enough, YouTube deleted it.

Think this was the only time the FDA has demand a social media giant to delete a post the FDA doesn't like?  We don't know, because the agency is apparently refusing to respond to FOIA requests seeking that information.

Can we trust the biden-harris-Democrat regime on ANYTHING?

Sure.  We can trust them to kill U.S. oil and gas, drive up prices for food and gasoline, and cause millions of American workers to choose between taking the ineffective but dangerous vax and being fired.

Thanks, Democrats.

H/T Alex Berenson
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/an-fda-official-demanded-google-censor/comments