ACLU: "We care deeply about civil liberties, which is why we support forcing everyone to take the vax"

 The ACLU has always been a pro-socialist, pro-Democrat cesspool.  If you doubted that, it was made clear two days ago when the organization wrote an op-ed for the NY Slimes under this headline:

Ah, "embrace vaccine mandates," eh?  Wait...by definition vaccine "mandates" FORCE people to submit to being injected with a known-dangerous experimental mRNA potion.  How can the ACLU seriously claim forcing people to submit to the vax "enhances civil liberties"?

Easy:  you just have to understand "Democrat logic."  Cuz according to the ACLU, forcing everyone to take the jab isn't just "reasonable," it's f'n FAAAABULOUS!  And why?  Because according to the ACLU (and that's the key): “The disease is highly transmissible, serious and often lethal; the vaccines are safe and effective; and crucially there is no equally effective alternative available to protect public health.”

If you didn't fully understand that part in red, read it again.  The entire bullshit, illogical basis for the ACLU's moronic, pro-dictatorship position is that there is no effective alternative available to protect public health.

Of course you can only claim that if you ignore HCQ/zinc/azithromycin, and Ivermectin.  Which they do, as Fauci and the CDC and the regime all do, resolutely.

The ACLU admits that “vaccines are [an] intrusion on autonomy and bodily integrity” and cleverly posture that people have a “fundamental right to bodily integrity and to make our own health care decisions.”  But they claim the "intrusion on autonomy" is "justifiable," and that what they just postured as "the right to bodily integrity" "is not absolute,” because no one has “the right to inflict harm on others.”

And the Democrats think this is perfectly logical.  You thought you had the right to make your own decisions about your own health, but only as long as your Democrat rulers agree.  Which, of course, means there is no such "right." 

And about the ACLU's (and Fauci, and CDC's) claim that there's no effective alternative therapy, despite dozens of double-blind studies?  Despite the discovery of Ivermectin being FDA approved, and winning the Nobel prize for medicine in 2015?  It's simply that the CDC refuses to do a trial of either against the Chyna virus.  So despite both HCQ and Ivermectin being approved for human use, the FDA and CDC haven't approved either specifically for use against the Chyna virus.

Which means they can ignore "effective alternative," unless they graciously decide to do a trial.  Which will never happen.

The article concludes, “We care deeply about civil liberties and civil rights for all – which is precisely why we support vaccine mandates.” But we've just seen that the ACLU sneeringly denies what were once regarded as unquestioned rights, because doing so supports the ruling regime.

Source.