Democrat candidate for gov of Virginia doesn't sign candidate form, but form has 2 witness signatures

Terry McAuliffe is a thoroughly corrupt Dem politician, a former money-raiser for the Clintons.  He was governor of Virginia from    to   and is now running for that post again.

The Democrat party touts McAuliffe as an extremely experienced, savvy politician.

Yeah.  Well...Virginia law requires that when someone wants to run for office must file a form announcing his candidacy.  Virginia law requires the candidate himself to sign this form.

The "extremely experienced" McAuliffe forgot to sign the form.  Thus by law he can't be on the ballot.

But wait...it gets better:  The form requires that two people attest that they witnessed the candidate sign the form.  Got that?  Good.

Now:  There are two signatures above the lines saying "witness signature."  Yet the candidate's signature is nowhere to be found.  How can the witnesses claim to have seen him sign it since McAuliffe's signature isn't there?  And how do the Democrats and McAuliffe explain the false witness statements, eh?
 
But wait...it gets even better:  Since Virginia law has not been obeyed, today the Virginia Republican Party filed a lawsuit asking that McAuliffe be barred from running for governor.  Separately, the lawsuit asks the court for an injunction barring the state board of elections from printing ballots containing McAuliffe's name.

Now...does anyone really think a state judge will rule against the Democrat party and their candidate?  Yeah, I agree, there's no way that will happen.  The Democrat judge will rule that *even though* some silly technical detail wasn't complied with, the candidate's intention is clear, so the judge will RULE that this failure to comply with this trivial detail isn't serious enough to remove the Democrat from the ballot.

Let that sink in for a minute.  I've been saying for years that there are two sets of laws in this country: ordinary people have to obey the law, but connected elites (Democrats all) can break any law with no penalty.  Judges and DA's simply look the other way.

So the fun here will be to see how the judge and the Dems spin this to pretend that they're *really* huge supporters of the law, but the law needs to be *flexible*, so as not to punish people for breaking trivial laws that are really just...um...*suggestions*.

The second hoot will be to see how the Mainstream Media will manage to ignore this story, since it proves the point above:  That there are two sets of laws, and the Dems can break laws the rest of us must obey.  But the Dems are never punished.

Source.

https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/oops-terry-mcauliffe/