Smoking gun: In Michigan 150,000 ballots counted for "Biden" didn’t vote for the party's senate candidate

It isn’t unheard of for voters to not fill out their entire ballot.  State questions and lower-level offices often don't get as much attention as state and federal races, so some voters don't vote on those because they just don’t know or care enough. 

But the vast majority of people who vote for president also vote on senate and congressional races. That's always been true in the past, and is true in other states that weren't "in play," meaning close races--the ones most attractive for a party bent on cheating.

However, this year in Michigan--a closely contested swing state that magically manufactured enough votes to put Biden over the top at the last minute--almost 150,000 ballots allegedly cast for Biden didn't have any vote for the Dem senate candidate.

According to current numbers from DecisionDeskHQ, 5,867,609 people in Michigan voted in the presidential election but just 5,717,819 voted in the very competitive Senate election.  In other words, 149,790 supposed "voters" supposedly didn't think their party's senate candidate was worth a vote.

Biden currently leads the vote tally in Michigan by 145,935 votes--meaning that if most of the 149,790 rather unusual ballots were fraudulent, he should lose.

Some might say that the state's senate race was so competitive that many voters couldn't decide who to vote for.  So instead of supporting their party's choice for president--possibly helping the Dems flip control of the senate--these folks thought it better not to vote for either party's senate candidate.

If you believe that, you probably believe the moon landings were elaborate fakes.

To compare this to "normal," let's examine another state with a competitive Senate race: South Carolina.  South Carolina was thought to be solidly Republican, so the Dems didn't have a good incentive to cheat there.  And 2,514,124 voted for president while 2,512,793 voted in the Senate race-- a difference of just 1,331 votes, compared to almost 150,000 in Michigan.. And South Carolina is a normal figure.  Michigan is the huge, glaring outlier.

So how did Michigan apparently have so many more people "voting" for president than for the senate candidate?

Some on the right are blaming two hacking programs supposedly used by the CIA to change the result of foreign elections.  Some conservates claim these hacks--supposedly called “The Hammer” and “Scorecard”-- were used by the CIA as well as the Obama administration in 2012 to change voting totals during the transmission of votes from precincts to the central tallying agency.  They supposedly hack into the interface between polling locations and the state’s repository and change the totals being reported. 

In 2015 a guy named Dennis Montgomery testified before congress that Joe Biden and Barack Obama used this hacking system in 2012 to win in Florida for the Dems.  If true, Biden would have known about the system, and could have used it in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania.  But I'm VERY skeptical of this theory.

It's not that I doubt that something like this is possible, but rather that it seems unlikely that if the CIA had a hand in this, they would have allowed the Democrats to use it in such a clumsy way--altering votes for president but not adding the same number of votes to the Democrat in the senate race.  Instead there's a far simpler explanation:  

It would be trivially easy for the Dems--who run the election process in all three of the states named above--to hire people to fill out blank ballots, which would then be fed into the "tabulators" as fast as possible, at 4 a.m. after all the poll watchers had been kicked out.  Even if these corrupt conspirators were carefully trained, I doubt these folks are too bright, so it wouldn't be unusual that after filling out a few thousand or so they'd start speeding the process by just filling in the presidential vote, ignoring the down-ballot.

In South Carolina--a state where Dems had no incentive to cheat--just 1,331 more votes were for Biden than for the Democrat senate candidate.  That's normal and understandable.  By contrast, the folks running Michigan's vote-counting process claim 149,790 people who voted for Biden had no interest in voting for the Democrat senate candidate.  

Anyone who believes that is delusional. 

This election was hacked--and this is just one of the obvious telltales.  There will be many more.

And sure enough, once someone noticed this pattern, we found this from 2016:  In the 2016 election, in Georgia (which Trump won), the official vote results show a staggering 280,000 more votes for Hilliary than for the Democrat senate candidate.  This is absolutely implausible:  Sure, a few people willing to vote for the utterly corrupt Hilliary might not want to vote for the Democrat running for the senate--a prize the Dems dearly wanted to claim.  But does any rational human believe 280,000 Democrat voters would vote for Hilliary but NOT for the Dem senate candidate?   It would be ludicrous to believe that.  And yet...the official total reported it.

No one noticed this back in 2016 because Trump won Georgia.  So the Democrats' apparently submitting AT LEAST 280,000 fraudulent votes went unnoticed til now. 

And now for one more example from 2016 that shows the Democrats were submitting massive numbers of fake votes four years ago--meaning they had the system already working:  Everyone knew Florida was going to be extremely close, so if a party wanted to pick a state to cheat, this would be a likely target.  So...the official vote count showed Hilliary with 4,504,975 "votes."  So you'd think the Democrat candidate for senate (Patrick Murphy) would have gotten within a couple of thousand votes of that figure, since anyone for Hilliary would be voting for the Dem candidate that might give the Dems full control of the government.

The official count showed Murphy with 4,105,251 votes.

That is, the Dem senate candidate got almost 400,000 FEWER votes than Hilliary.  

Does any rational human on the planet think 400,000 rabidly partisan Democrats would show up to vote for Hilliary yet NOT vote for the Dem senate candidate--especially when that could have given the Dems control of the senate??? 

It's delusional to believe that.  But no one caught the huge, glaring anomaly because Trump eked out a bare win in Florida.  The anomaly went unnoticed until now.  And getting away with such a huge fraud--400,000 alleged "votes"!--the Democrats realized they could steal elections with impunity.

Now, as in 2016, the Democrats who run the actual vote-"counting" process didn't worry about being caught because they knew there wouldn't be any serious penalty.  If faced with serious prison time this year, I wonder if any will try to save themselves by testifying against their bosses?

Unless the Democrats and their media allies succeed in blocking the investigation, of course.