In the ten months since the FBI seized Hunter Biden's laptop (to make it vanish), they haven't briefed a single member of congress

If you want to get an idea how corrupt the FBI and the entire Mainstream Media have gotten, consider this:  Records unequivocally show that the FBI--that cesspool of corruption once run by the infamous lawbreaker James Comey--seized Hunter Biden's laptop last December (2019, if you're reading this next year).

That laptop contains thousands of emails showing that Hunter arranged meetings between his father--the Democrat nominee for president--and execs of a corrupt Ukrainian energy company called Burisma.

That's the company that appointed Hunter to its board at a salary of $83,333 per month.

We know that because the Treasury Department monitors all wire transfers from foreign companies and governments.

You may be wondering why such an odd figure for a monthly salary.  Why not a round number like $80,000 or $85,000, eh?  Try multiplying by 12 months.  You get a million bucks per year.  Not bad for someone who had ZERO experience in the energy business, eh?

One obvious possible conclusion is that the Ukrainian company put Hunter on their board as a way to justify a huge bribe to the Biden family.  But according to EVERY lying member of the Mainstream Media, you aren't allowed to ask any questions about that arrangement, nor to demand that the emails showing that Hunter was paid to arrange meetings with Joe--who was VP at the time--be made public.

Now imagine that the FBI had seized a laptop belonging to either of Trump's sons, containing tens of thousands of emails showing corruption.  Do ya think the FBI would have buried that evidence, or would they have aggressively pushed to investigate every single email?

Do ya think the FBI would have briefed Chuckie Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, Jerry Nadler on the contents?  Do you think corrupt FBI officials would have leaked the story to their media friends?

Of course.  But with Hunter's laptop, the FBI took no action whatsoever.  No Republican member of congress was briefed on the potential bribery.

But wait...there's more.  People who claim to have seen the contents of the laptop say it includes thousands of pics of Hunter smoking crack and romping with a girl who appears to be his 14-year-old niece Natalie, born in 2004. Natalie is the daughter of Hunter’s brother Beau, who died in 2015.

If the FBI had seized a laptop from either of Donald Trump's sons, which was found to contain thousands of similar pics, does any American believe they would have kept the contents seccret, and not briefed a single member of congress, nor leaked the contents to the press?

Of course not.  But after the FBI seized Hunter Biden's laptop containing the same pics, did the FBI--which claims to be the "top law-enforcement agency in the U.S."--brief any congress-critters?  Did they leak the contents to the Mainstream Media?

No to both.  The only reason any of this totally damning information has reached the public is that the owner of the computer repair shop suspected that the FBI would take no action (to protect the Democrat nominee from scandal), so before he contacted the FBI he made numerous copies of the laptop's data.

So again...compare the non-actions of the FBI when they got solid evidence of the corruption of Hunter and his father--no briefings, no leaks--to how the agency would have reacted if they'd gotten exactly the same information from a laptop belonging to one of Trump's sons.

When it comes to Democrats, the FBI will sit on evidence, but if the agency had the same info about a Republican's son--from the son's own laptop--it stayed quiet, briefed no one and didn't leak.

Still think they're not corrupt?  Still think this is a nation of laws?  Think things would get better under president Harris?

Source.