NYTimes says classical music is raaaacist, demands end to blind auditions. Seriously

The shit-head communists who staff the ghastly NY Times--having demonized virtually everything good about the United States--are now claiming a heretofore unmentioned niche in our society is raaaaacist:  classical music and opera.

See, classical music is raaaaacist cuz virtually every classical composer was white.  And if half were black males, the moronic society-wreckers at the Times would claim classical music was SEXIST.

And if half were female and a quarter were black or native American, the Times would claim that classical music was irredeemably awful cuz there weren't enough trannies or gays.

Gettin' the picture yet?  No matter what the facts were, the Times would claim that SOME group was under-represented among great classical composers, so all good-thinking liberals must band together and DEMAND a gruberment program to "fix" this grave injustice!

Ah, you think I'm kidding, eh?  Take a look at the tweet from the Times below:

So...Anthony Tommasini seems to be the Times resident idiot on this.  What do you think this moron recommends to fix this grave injustice?

Why of course:  This moron socialist demands that orchestras end a practice called "blind auditions."

Wait...what?  I thought the entire reason for INTRODUCING blind auditions was so that experts would be able to select the very best talent, without considering race.  Gosh, if you're looking for the best talent, that seems like a really great way to do things, eh?  But now the Times wants to junk this.

Everything from the @nytimes classical music critic is now about race and gender. pic.twitter.com/fNJxB9LTnc

— Benn Steil (@BennSteil) July 18, 2020

Hey Anthony, I'm just some guy from nowhere, so I'd like you to explain to all of us out here how your recommendation is would still pick the best musicians.  Seems to me that implicit in your scheme is that you demand that orchestras NOT always hire the best musician, but instead pick a person of preferred color or race even if not the best musician. 

Your scheme is the opposite of a meritocracy: You demand orchestras choose preferred races over hiring the best. 

Wait...of course you would demand that.  Considering who you work for, and their politics, no other scheme will do.

But given the success of BLM and their liberal Whigger supporters I wouldn't be surprised to see the NY Philharmonic doing an entire series of concerts featuring...rappers.

Hey, the thugs who ran the Soviet Union had a similar system:  The artists chosen for those sweet, lucrative gubmint commissions for, say, art, weren't the best, but were the ones who were politically reliable.  That's why communist art is prized around the world for its superior quality, eh?