Former employee sues Nike for $1.1 million for "pronoun abuses"
If you read the previous post, here's yet another example of the literal insanity that liberals and liberal judges have forced on the U.S. But don't click that link just yet.
A man claiming to be a woman has sued Nike for $1.1 million for...wait for it..."pronoun abuses." That's the actual headline of the CBS article at the link--"pronoun abuses."
If you're a hard-working American you may not have noticed when congress passed a law against "pronoun abuse," so you may be surprised that someone can actually file a lawsuit against a company or individual for this.
Oh wait...congress never passed any such law--which would presumably have been overturned on First Amendment grounds. (For students, that's the one that supposedly guarantees that you have "freedom of speech.") And yet...the lawsuit was in fact filed and has not been thrown out of court.
(But you should know that one of the first bills introduced by Nancy Pelosi and her Democrat lackeys in the current congress would make "pronoun abuse" a crime. It's cunningly called the "Equality Act" and House Democrats passed it very quickly.)
So how does "pronoun abuse" merit a million bucks? Ah: for allegedly "allowing gender-identity-based harassment."
Wait..."gender-identity-based harassment"?? Is that a real thing?
It's as real as a liberal judge decides it is, citizen. Certainly as real as "pronoun abuse." Cuz, see, instead of telling the tranny mafia to pound sand, Democrat pols and judges have sided with 'em. Literally, if you read the text of Pelosi's "Equality Act" you'll see that at the end of every sentence that outlaws discrimination on the basis of sex or "sexual orientation" they've added "or gender identity." Literally.
So...according to the lawsuit, during the plaintiff's 16 months at Nike he [she] "was repeatedly "misgendered" by coworkers." Translated from legal bullshit, this means coworkers used male pronouns instead of the snowflake's preferred "their." But to win the million, the tranny must also show that Nike ignored this awful abuse, failing "to implement any policies, procedures and trainings around the use of gender pronouns in the workplace."
AH, GOTCHA!!!!
Of course you don't live in Oregon, and you likely don't own a company, so why should you care about this, eh?
You shouldn't. This has no effect on anything, citizen. It's a legal "tempest in a teapot," of interest only to lawyers.
Hahahahahaha! Just kidding. If you don't see the problem, you can't be educated in time.
Oh, now about that link at the top: Because the CBS headline used "pronoun abuse" you might think they realized this is a bullshit, money-grubbing lawsuit. Not even close: CBS LOVES this, as shown by their inclusion in their article of four long, absolutely fawning videos about how wonderful trannies are, and how awful it is when someone doesn't recognize that a man has identified as female, or vice-versa.
In a rational society this lawsuit would be thrown out of court.
A man claiming to be a woman has sued Nike for $1.1 million for...wait for it..."pronoun abuses." That's the actual headline of the CBS article at the link--"pronoun abuses."
If you're a hard-working American you may not have noticed when congress passed a law against "pronoun abuse," so you may be surprised that someone can actually file a lawsuit against a company or individual for this.
Oh wait...congress never passed any such law--which would presumably have been overturned on First Amendment grounds. (For students, that's the one that supposedly guarantees that you have "freedom of speech.") And yet...the lawsuit was in fact filed and has not been thrown out of court.
(But you should know that one of the first bills introduced by Nancy Pelosi and her Democrat lackeys in the current congress would make "pronoun abuse" a crime. It's cunningly called the "Equality Act" and House Democrats passed it very quickly.)
So how does "pronoun abuse" merit a million bucks? Ah: for allegedly "allowing gender-identity-based harassment."
Wait..."gender-identity-based harassment"?? Is that a real thing?
It's as real as a liberal judge decides it is, citizen. Certainly as real as "pronoun abuse." Cuz, see, instead of telling the tranny mafia to pound sand, Democrat pols and judges have sided with 'em. Literally, if you read the text of Pelosi's "Equality Act" you'll see that at the end of every sentence that outlaws discrimination on the basis of sex or "sexual orientation" they've added "or gender identity." Literally.
So...according to the lawsuit, during the plaintiff's 16 months at Nike he [she] "was repeatedly "misgendered" by coworkers." Translated from legal bullshit, this means coworkers used male pronouns instead of the snowflake's preferred "their." But to win the million, the tranny must also show that Nike ignored this awful abuse, failing "to implement any policies, procedures and trainings around the use of gender pronouns in the workplace."
AH, GOTCHA!!!!
Of course you don't live in Oregon, and you likely don't own a company, so why should you care about this, eh?
You shouldn't. This has no effect on anything, citizen. It's a legal "tempest in a teapot," of interest only to lawyers.
Hahahahahaha! Just kidding. If you don't see the problem, you can't be educated in time.
Oh, now about that link at the top: Because the CBS headline used "pronoun abuse" you might think they realized this is a bullshit, money-grubbing lawsuit. Not even close: CBS LOVES this, as shown by their inclusion in their article of four long, absolutely fawning videos about how wonderful trannies are, and how awful it is when someone doesn't recognize that a man has identified as female, or vice-versa.
In a rational society this lawsuit would be thrown out of court.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home