You can't make this stuff up
You can't make this stuff up:
In the ultra-woke, ultra-politically-correct, no-free-speech UK, a researcher tweeted that "men cannot become women."
In the ultra-woke, ultra-politically-correct, no-free-speech UK this is a firing offense. And sure enough, she was instantly fired.
She filed suit against her employer, claiming her tweet was free speech.
A judge in the ultra-woke, ultra-politically-correct, no-free-speech UK ruled that while "free speech" was indeed a cherished right, saying such an offensive thing as "men cannot become women" was hate speech, and not entitled to any protection whatsoever.
Learning of this, the author of the Harry Potter series tweeted this:
WELL!! The trannies immediately mounted a screaming, hair-pulling attack on Rowling. Of course as Rowling is worth a billion dollars or so, she's pretty much immune to tranny wrath. But...
On this side of the pond, former actor Mark Hamil made the mistake of "liking" Rowling's tweet.
Whereupon the trannies immediately mounted the same attack on Hamill. Unfortunately Hamill, unlike Rowling, might want to work at least one more time, so he immediately begged forgiveness, like this:
Nicely done, Mark! You're sure to be warmly welcomed back into the fold of "right-thinking" Hollywoodiots. It comes as no surprise that you'd bow to the tranny mafia instead of standing up for the rights of some nobody who got fired for making a true statement. Nice to know your priorities.
In the ultra-woke, ultra-politically-correct, no-free-speech UK, a researcher tweeted that "men cannot become women."
In the ultra-woke, ultra-politically-correct, no-free-speech UK this is a firing offense. And sure enough, she was instantly fired.
She filed suit against her employer, claiming her tweet was free speech.
A judge in the ultra-woke, ultra-politically-correct, no-free-speech UK ruled that while "free speech" was indeed a cherished right, saying such an offensive thing as "men cannot become women" was hate speech, and not entitled to any protection whatsoever.
Learning of this, the author of the Harry Potter series tweeted this:
WELL!! The trannies immediately mounted a screaming, hair-pulling attack on Rowling. Of course as Rowling is worth a billion dollars or so, she's pretty much immune to tranny wrath. But...
On this side of the pond, former actor Mark Hamil made the mistake of "liking" Rowling's tweet.
Whereupon the trannies immediately mounted the same attack on Hamill. Unfortunately Hamill, unlike Rowling, might want to work at least one more time, so he immediately begged forgiveness, like this:
Ignorance is no excuse, but I liked the tweet without understanding what the last line or hashtags meant. It was the 1st 4 lines I liked. I didn't realize it had any transphobic connotation.And note how deftly Hamill implied that Rowling's perfectly generous, barely-critical (just of the woman being fired) was "transphobic."
Nicely done, Mark! You're sure to be warmly welcomed back into the fold of "right-thinking" Hollywoodiots. It comes as no surprise that you'd bow to the tranny mafia instead of standing up for the rights of some nobody who got fired for making a true statement. Nice to know your priorities.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home