Twatter bans a mother for posting tweets critical of Democrat policies

As an American you supposedly have freedom of speech.  It's right there in the First Amendment.

But what few Americans know is that social media, like Twatter, can close your account if you say anything they don't like.

Oh wait, say Twatter supporters:  Twatter is generous, reasonable, willing to forgive (at least to some extent):  If you post something they don't like, they'll graciously give you the chance to apologize, by deleting posts you made that they don't like.

Let me repeat that:  These assholes will graciously GIVE YOU a chance to grovel and apologize, by deleting your own posts that the thought-limiters at Twatter have deemed offensive.

Surely you agree that Twatter is incredibly generous to let you do this, eh citizen?

For example, an ordinary, non-elite Twatter user--Mary Ann Mendoza--posted a "tweet" critical of Democrat darling Kamala Harris.  Twatter promptly banned Mendoza--but then generously offered the poster the chance to be un-banned, if she would just delete the tweets Twatter deemed offensive.

A Twatter spokesperson did not explain why Mendoza was banned, just that if she wanted to be un-banned she'd have to delete her own tweets that Twatter's thought-cops claimed were offensive.

Wow.  So some of you might be curious to know what Mendoza said that triggered the asshole snowflakes at Twatter, eh?  Okay, Mendoza accused Kamala Harris of...wait for it...pushing the "sanctuary state" policies that allow illegal aliens to live in various Democrat-ruled cities and states in the U.S.

Wait...isn't that a totally accurate description of Harris's position?

Why yes, yes it is, comrade.  But even though truth is a defense in libel law, something as trivial as "truth" isn't enough to keep the thought-cops at Twatter from banning you.

But of course you can't believe that.  I don't blame you.  As an American you've been taught that truth is pretty much the ultimate virtue.  You can't believe a company could ban you for telling the truth, eh?

Welcome to social media, comrade.

So let's take a look at what Mendoza actually posted:

SEE, citizen?  Mendoza accused Kamala and Pelosi (and by inference, all Dems) of favoring illegal alien immigrants.  So it's amazing that Twatter merely banned her, instead of sending Antifa thugs to her house to burn it down.

See how gracious, how generous Twatter is, citizen?

Now:  It should be clear that Mary Ann Mendoza is surely mentally unbalanced to criticize a Democrat presidential candidate, the Dem speaker of the house and any other person who supports letting illegal aliens stay in the U.S. forever.  So why do you think she's so...unhinged?

Could it have anything to do with the fact that in May of 2014 her 32-year-old son Brandon--a police officer in Mesa, Arizona-- was killed by a drunk illegal alien invader who was driving the wrong way down an interstate highway.

Nah.  She's probably just a raaaacist.

Wait... Brandon Mendoza--the officer killed by the drunk illegal alien--was Hispanic.  Hmmm...

The illegal immigrant who killed officer Mendoza had a criminal record in the U.S.  He was a Mexican national with a blood-alcohol level nearly three times the legal limit,

Before Corona crashed into officer Mendoza, he'd driven 35 miles along several Phoenix-area freeways in the wrong direction.

Initial news reports made no mention of the illegal alien being drunk, nor that he was illegally in the U.S, nor his criminal history after entering the U.S, cuz...reasons.  Back in 1994 Corona pleaded guilty to criminal conspiracy in Colorado, in a plea deal in which prosecutors dismissed charges of burglary, assault and leaving the scene of an accident.

But by all means, Twatter, ban the mother's tweets.  Yeh, dat's da ticket.