August 31, 2018

More on bombshell that the Chinese were getting real-time copies of every Hilliary email

We're learning more about the bombshell claim from congressman Louie Gohmert that a company owned by the Chinese government hacked Hillary Clinton’s private email server and was getting copies of every one of her emails--in real time, no less!--during her entire tenure as Obozo's hand-picked Secretary of State.


An honest member of the intel community had told Gohmert about this before corrupt FBI agent Peter Strzok appeared before the House committee investigating FBI corruption.  Specifically, that the Inspector General of the intel community (IGIC) had discovered the Chinese theft of all Clinton's emails.

And the utter beauty of it was that Gohmert didn't reveal this before corrupt agent Strzok testified before the House committee.

Ruh-roh.

So when it was Gohmert's turn to question Strzok, the congressman asked Strzok "Were you briefed by members of the Intelligence Community Inspector General’s staff, on the ICIG's finding that a hostile nation had infiltrated Clinton’s unauthorized server  and sent copies of all of her emails to the hostile nation’s intelligence apparatus?"

Strzok was utterly taken by surprise.  "Uh, uh, uh, uh...I...I...I..."   He had no idea anyone outside the intel community knew he'd been briefed--and he was totally sure the intel community was in on the plot to ensure Hilliary won the election, so never imagined....

Oooooh...

Now before we go further, you need to know that Peter Strzok official job title was chief of "counter-intelligence" for the FBI.  "Counter-intelligence" is the business of finding efforts by foreign powers to spy on the U.S., and arresting any such agents in the U.S.  In other words, the penetration Strzok was briefed on by the ICIG agents was precisely his job description.

You'll never guess what Strzok's answer to Gohmert's question was.

Strzok said he "vaguely recalled" the briefing...but couldn't recall any of the details!

"Cuz, like, dude, it didn't concern me.  Didn't seem very important.  Not my job, see?"

Can you say "Lying scumbag"?  "Treasonous piece of shit"?  Sure you can.

The top five levels of FBI leadership are all totally corrupt.  And keep in mind, they're the folks who supposedly are the ultimate in enforcing our laws!

Now, note something extremely vital:  When Gohmert surprised Strzok with his question, did Strzok deny that he'd ever been briefed by members of the intel community on anything like that?  No, he didn't.  If he'd had time to think, he would have.  But he didn't have time to think it through.

Now remember, this happened back on July 12th. 

Now:  Gohmert's revelation about the Chinese theft of Hilliary's official emails while she was SecState--meaning the Chinese knew everything the US. government was doing and thinking as soon as Hilliary did--was made about 4 days ago.  You'd think that as explosive as the mere claim is, it would have made headlines in all the major papers, eh?

Hahahahahaha!  I see you just arrived in this country, stranger.

Not a peep from the liberal media.

But here's the telltale:  There has been no response whatsoever from the Clinton camp, or from Democrats.

They're ignoring it, hoping no voters will notice.  Cuz, see, four months before the 2016 election, FBI director James "snake" Comey testified before congress that Hilliary hadn't done anything wrong in conducting all official business on a private email server.  Oh sure, maybe she'd broken federal law on handling classified info by sending that info to her private server, but he quickly added that because he found no intent, he assured voters that no federal agent would indict her.

Comey also assured voters that the FBI had found no evidence whatsoever that any foreign power had hacked into Hilliary's private, unencrypted, unsecured email server.  And since Comey was head of the FBI, everyone believe his testimony.  Problem solved!  Hilliary cruises to a win!  Yay!!
 
So after Strzok's bombshell, one party has offered what the mainstream media are quoting as a defense:  The FBI issued a statement that the agency had found no evidence that Hilliary's server had been hacked.  But "found no evidence" doesn't disprove the claim.  Just means they didn't look very hard.  But of course the media is pushing this with not a trace of demurral.

Wow.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home