August 12, 2018

Devastating California fires teach a lesson--except moonbats don't want to hear it

As California continues to suffer from massive fires, Americans are easy pickins' for the pitch--the lie--that the fires are due to "global warming" (now cunningly renamed "climate change").

That's a lie.  There are two true explanations: arson, and an insane theory called "re-wilding," which has become the controlling theory of National Forest management.

"Re-wilding" is the response to the belief that humans are to blame for the “degradation of our planet.”  The idea was that all natural processes are good, and thus that any efforts by humans to reduce the natural course of those processes must therefore be bad.

Oooh, love it!  Simple logic, understandable by everyone.  Must be true! 

So under this theory, if natural processes are good, "rewilding" the land can repair damage we’ve caused and reconnect us to the natural world.  At least that's how the moonbats see it.

It's no secret that huge piles of dead tree branches burn like crazy.  It's also been the general concensus of rational people that huge forest fires aren't good.  So the primitive, unenlightened theory of forest management was to clear out dead wood, which would allow new trees to grow and would reduce the severity of fires.

But around the 1970's someone wrote a paper claiming that huge forest fires actually helped certain plant species proliferate, by taking out all the trees that would otherwise have made too much shade.  Quickly the same sort of people who force the government to spend a million bucks studying the effects of  "shaming" on trannies in Myanmar funded more such studies, designed to find the same type of thing.

And in the blink of an eye the "all-human-action-is-bad" zealots in government changed official policy to BAN clearing any dead trees from national forests--even though everyone agreed this would make future fires more devastating.  Cuz that was nature's way, comrade.

Once that fundamental change in philosophy was rammed thru, a myriad of laws and regulations followed--pushed through and administered by a growing cadre of ideological zealots in federal land management agencies.  And these moonbats have dominated federal forest-management agencies ever since.

Among many other things, these regulations banned ordinary Americans from even gathering dead wood from forests--i.e. reducing the fire danger for free.

I'd love to see one of the "humans-bad" moonbats stand before a dozen TV cameras in California and say "You dumb bastards need to realize that when we prevented Americans from gathering dead wood, we were doing a good thing.  Yes, critics warned us that subsequent forest fires would be more destructive, and we realize this one has destroyed 1000 homes.  But you need to understand that this is in the service of a Higher Good that you deplorables just don't understand.  So yes, this was a known effect of our policies, and you need to realize it's A Good Thing.  So quit bitching!"

Yeah, like that'll ever happen.

If the Republicans had rammed thru the "No clearing of dead brush allowed" policy, the Mainstream Media would be on a frenzied attack, asking how on earth this policy had ever won approval.  The media would claim it was the greed of Big Corporations that didn't want little people to get free wood or something.  But have you heard a SINGLE WORD about the fires being infinitely more destructive due to the dumb-ass policy of not clearing dead wood and brush?  No.

Republicans in congress [spit!] could win lotsa votes by taking this on.  But they're too timid to do so.  They don't wanna' cross the enviro's, foolishly thinking the moonbats would ever vote Repub.

Oh well.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home