Did "officials" in Seattle public skoolz claim "Maff beez raaacis'"?

Five years ago I read that the Seattle public skool system had declared dat "Maff [math] beez RAAaaacist!"  Wanted to find out if they'd actually implemented that horseshit, and if so, how it was working out for 'em.

OOoohhh, "Page not found!"  So I tried another dozen search variations, with the same result.  Wow!  "Hope springs eternal," eh?  I was hoping the outrage from parents would have slapped the fuck out of whichever dumbshit came up with this bullshit.

(Of course it wasn't just one person, eh?  One person couldn't get this published on the Seattle Public Skoolz website without a LOT of pipo signing off on it!)  But with the page taken down, dere wuz no way to prove the moonbats who run all public skoolz in Democrat-ruled states (and also, surprisingly, in lots of conservative states!).

Oh wait:  Thanks to the internet, that page still exists, even though the Seattle Public Skool system took it down and clearly hopes you can't find it.  But I did, and it's below.  You should be able to click to enlarge it:

 

Yes, the website published all the above bullshit on their official taxpayer-funded website.  But let's not jump to the conclusion that the authors--and the folx who run the website--were/are racist, communist fucks.  Cuz just because dey posted  it doesn't mean dey believe it, right?   

Hmmm...wonder if the authors and the pipo who run the website got fired?  Nah, no one got fired.  

Moonbat: "Yew cain't know dat!"  Really?  Cuz if dey'd been fired dey wud have sued the skool system.  And you know that's true.  But no one did.  Q.E.D.  (If you're a young highschool student who doesn't know Latin, look it up.)

And we're just getting started.

 

Now follow me here:  "Liberation" is universally recognized as good.  No one argues against it.  So anything that "prevents liberation" would be...um...take your guess.

Sure: doesn't take a PhD to realize the opposite of good is bad, eh?  But then the author makes the "naked assertion" ("I sed it, so yew mus' accept it!):

"How does [sic] data-driven processes prevent liberation."

Aside from the grammatical error (dude, "grammar beez raaaacis!"), the obvious implication by the author is that "data-driven processes prevent liberation," and thus must be raaaacist, eh?

But how?  Is it racist to note that there are 100 cents in a dollar?  360 degrees in a circle?  That the sum of the interior angles of a triangle is always 180 degrees?  Not getting "raaacist" out of those.  But apparently the author(s) is/are.

  

Ahhh, so the author asserts (implies that it must be taken as truth) that math is "manipulated to allow inequality and oppression to persist," eh?  The authors specifically mention "oppression" a dozen times.

Now, I get it: students who read carefully could see that being proficient in maff is good.  But that point is buried under layers of "Maff iz oppressive!"  Wonder how many student readers or raacist teachers came away believing "oppressive" instead of "It's useful to be proficient in math," eh?

Of course the authors (and apparently the anti-white racists who run the website of the Seattle skool system) thought it would be too white to say "Learning math is a good idea."  So they led with "Maff beez raaaacis!"  Wonder how many minority students got past that naked assertion, eh?

In any case, AI sez Seattle's public skool system nevah sed maff beez raaacist!  Cuz see, dey din' explicitly say dat.  Got it.  So all those quotes above--from the website of Seattle public skoolz--do NOT mean dey wuz claimin' "maff beez raaacis."

Wow, such a relief! 

Source.