How to know if the Mainstream Media is covering for the Democrats

If you're over 20 or so, you may have noticed that advertisers lie to ya--constantly.  And you get good at spotting the techniques they use to get stupid or gullible people to "buy" the lies.

Those are called "tells."  The term applies to poker, interrogation and psychology, among others.

Some of those "tells" are easy/obvious, so if you're over 30 or so and have been really observant, you may have learned how to recognize some or many.

One of the most obvious is "Sale ends soon!"  "Limited-time offer!"  "Quantities limited!"  Almost everyone over 20 recognizes this is a pitch to get people to buy NOW, cuz if ya don't you'll miss out on the latest cool, trendy thing, eh?  Okay, that one's obvious.

Another one is "argument from authority:"  If some "authority" authoratively states X is true, virtually everyone believes it, simply because they trust the source.  "Doctors say..."  "The FDA warns that..."  Of course for all listeners know the source could be some dipshit leftist editor at MSNBC.  You probably wouldn't believe a leftist dipshit, but if the ad claims an authority said it, people believe.

So the dipshit leftist throws in "Informed sources tell MSNBC that...."  Or "A member of congress, speaking anonymously for fear of retaliation, said..."  Same effect--it makes more people believe the claim--without a shred of extra proof.  So the "vaccine" for duh Chyna virus was endlessly touted as "safe AND effective" when the CDC knew it did NOT prevent you from getting covid, and in many cases those injected died within days.

Bribem ordered you to take it anyway.  And the corrupt, Democrat-ruled schools ordered your kids to take it.  Hmmm... 

The truth there is that many people who took it were injured, and many died.  And tens of thousands of those who did take the jab got Covid anyway.  So it was neither safe NOR completely effective.  But if the bribem regime had told the truth, a lot fewer Americans would have taken the thing.  So they simply... lied.

Another "tell" is to claim "We don't [or "can't"] comment on an ongoing investigation.  If the question involves what witnesses saw, this can be legitimate: you don't want to bias the accounts of witnesses who have yet to be interviewed.  But in most cases the statement is a "tell" that the authorities aren't *seriously* investigating.

Example: "Do you have the surveillance video from the cameras inside the lecture hall?"  "We can't comment on an ongoing investigation."  The answer is a dodge, because the answer wouldn't have any effect on witness testimony.  Instead it's a way of refusing to admit that the cameras hadn't worked for years--but no one cared.

Another "tell" is when the authorities refuse to give *responsive answers* to questions.  Example: "How many gunshots struck Ella Cook in the shooting at Brown?"  Answer: "It's important that we not jump to conclusions..." followed by a long word-salad unrelated to the question.  The LONG response makes people believe that the "authority" (the lying propagandist) answered the question, when in reality he or she did no such thing.  The "authority's" mouth is moving, and words are coming out, but they have no bearing on the question that was asked.

If someone raises the same question later, the fraudsters respond with "This was asked and put to rest weeks ago," when of course it was NOT put to rest.  And no one ever goes back to the video of the non-responsive word-salad to confirm the question was NOT answered in a responsive way.

Of course the Mainstream Media has the vid of the non-answer, and could easily show viewers how the "authority figure" didn't actually answer the question.  They don't do that because if a responsive answer would hurt the Democrat party, the Media isn't interested.

This plays into the last "tell" (for now): When the Narrative for some event--i.e. the cover story--is contradicted by just one stubborn bit of evidence.  Very few lies--cover stories, Narratives--perfectly account for every bit of evidence.  There are almost always a few pieces that contradict the Narrative.  The plotters can't make those things disappear, and don't want to try to explain 'em, so that's when you see the "authority figure" turn away and walk off, as the Minders say "That's all the questions we have time for today.  Thanks for coming!"    

Now that you know what to look for, watch how often these "tells" pop up after every unsettling "incident."