WaPo runs an op-ed: "Why Gen-Z men *love Trump's reign of destruction*" Wow!

This is gonna wander a bit, but it all comes together at the end.

I've been fortunate beyond measure to have lived a charmed life.  Had a world-class education and lots of time to study how people and nations behave and interact.  As a result I'm pretty good at predicting the result of current events.

Nothing spooky or magic, just predicting results of current events.  It's fun, and is why I started writing this blog back in 2003.  So...here we go:

A few days ago the Washington Post ran an "opinion piece" titled "Why Gen-Z men love Trump’s reign of destruction."

Ahh, "Trump's reign of destruction," eh?   Wow, no bias there!  Sure glad owner Jeff Bezos told voters he'd instructed the paper's editors to make the opinion page more neutral, eh?  Of course the paper's staff saw his big wink, so...one editor resigned by no change in policy.

I note this because the WaPo and New York Times are the visible faces of the Democrat party and the Left, whose game plan is to destroy Trump, capitalism and the U.S. you and I grew up in.

Naturally you don't believe that.  Fine.

Now, the Post's "opinion piece"--"Why Gen-Z men love Trump’s reign of destruction"--stakes out the Left/Dem position by inference: Trump beez 'destroying ouah precious democracy!!  An' "Gen-Z men" love Trump's "reign of destruction," eh?  So...do you need any more info to reach the Post's desired conclusion?

Of course not: We jus' tol' ya Trump is eeeebil, and so are "Gen-Z men."

For the un-cool (me), Wiki says Gen-Z people are those born between the late 1990s and the early 2010s.  So they're roughly 14 to 27 now.

They do love Trump, and want a strong, confident U.S.  They want a president and government that put America first. That means they don't like political parties that  push all the goofy leftist hand-wringing, hair-pulling, angst-ridden left-wing/Democrat guilt-trip bullshit.  

The Left *hates* the slogan "Make America Great Again."  Gen-Z men *love it.*  They know the Media has lied to Americans for at least 50 years if not longer, and they've had enough of that, thanks.  So the ones who were old enough voted for Trump.

The Democrat party knows that unless the discredit this, the party is doomed.  Since the party totally refuses to change its faaabulous policies--like open borders, trannies in the military, putting male prisoners claiming to be female in women's prisons, forcing Americans--including kids--to take the ineffective covid jab--the only option for the Dems is to tie this group tightly to Trump, and then make Americans hate Trump.

Voila!  Problem solved, eh?  So the editors of the WaPo--all being good Democrats--fired this shot.  After it sinks in, the next shot is "Gen-Z males re-thinking their support for Trump."  Count on it.

The piece will include a profile of a handsome, muscular Gen-Z male claiming "The GOP was playing us for suckers, but I finally woke up."  Oh, and he'll have a hot girlfriend.  And a hot car.

So...the WaPo "opinion piece" tipped the Democrats' hand about strategy: 'We can't tolerate young males deserting ouah partei and voting for our enemies.  We know they don't like our policies, but we aren't about to change those, so that leaves Plan B: discredit Gen-Z males by tying 'em to Trump, then blaming Trump for... everything: Glowbull Worming, inflation, open borders, the stock market, deficits, hurting po' federal workers by firing 'em...you get it.  

That's the long-term goal.  In the short term the Post (Dems) wants to intimidate the Supreme Court to get just two justices to vote with the three female liberals to support the rulings of the lower courts in the 30-some lawsuits filed against Trump.
 
So let me predict the future: The corrupt leftist courts, and the Deep State, will continue to block every attempt by Trump to cut waste and fraud in gruberment spending.  

Not just "some" efforts.  All of 'em.

Leftist judges have already ordered all USAID employees re-hired.  Ordered all cancelled grants restored.  They've ORDERED that Trump can't deport illegal-alien murderers and rapists.  Ordered that he must restore rescinded security clearances of clearly socialist-supporting law firms.

Of course Democrats support those orders.  Our $36 TRILLION national debt means nothing to them--it's a total abstraction.  They are adamant that federal employees, once hired, must never be fired.

A moment's thought will lead to the conclusion that government spending can never be cut.  But if spending isn't cut, the debt will increase every year, eh?  Do you really think a reckoning will never come?  We're already paying almost a TRILLION dollars a year just in *interest* on the debt.  Dems just shrug.

Angry Democrat moms hate Trump and Musk because they see those two men as "strict daddy."  "Daddy won't let me spend a lousy $400 to see faaabulous Tay-tay!"   And since most daughters take their cues from mom, there's a huge chunk of the electorate.

But to return to Gen-Z:  they see things way differently.  Yes, roughly half of young American males are metrosexual betas who don't care what happens to the country as long as they have their video games and weed.  But other males do care what happens...a LOT: Gen-Z.  

From a young age boys are acutely aware of competition from other males, so they intuitively understand competition between nations--something few girls or women seem to know or care about.

Non-beta males know Democrat policies like open borders and government waste and fraud are killing the U.S, and they're angry.  And they also know that the Media and "elites" totally support the Democrat party, so young men know that nothing they say will change the policies of gruberment by a millimeter.

Even in Trump's first term, the DeepState/FBI pressured Fakebook and pre-Musk Twatter to delete posts the Democrats didn't like, or even cancel user accounts.  The sons of bitches even locked the account of the New York Post after that paper--ALONE--published the bombshell story about hunty bribem's laptop, with tens of thousands of emails and pic suggesting total corruption.

So the DeepState was chewing up free speech rights even when Trump was president, before the corrupt 2020 election that saddled us with Porridgebrain and Cackles.

When the Deep State takes away free speech that leaves just two options: try to vote the Dems out of power, or...war.

Of course you don't believe that.  You laugh and say "Dat not possible."  And you may be right.  I'm not gonna be around to see how this turns out.  But if you're 25 or 30 years old, you will be--as will your kids.

Now let's try a thought experiment: four years ago how many of you ever even *imagined* that Democrats/leftists would have burned hundreds of Teslas at dealerships who hate Elon Musk--simply because he supports Trump?  Or would be cutting off female Tesla drivers on the street and punching them?

Not one of you would have predicted any of that.  You never imagined it, because nothing like it has ever happened before, eh?  So using that same *flawless* logic, you think that if you continue to steal elections and block all efforts to cut government waste and fraud, young men will keep their heads down and pay their taxes and obey your "two sets of laws"?

Sure, Jan.  Sounds absolutely assured.

Now: you all believe that if something hasn't happened before, it can't happen.  Of course I just showed you a minute ago that your "logic" sucks. I'm just telling you the future if the Left wins most of the 30-some lawsuits against Trump.  

To review: If we don't stop spending more than the gruberment takes in, debt will continue to increase, as will the required interest.  We already have to *borrow the money to pay the interest,* and at some point--within the next decade--we won't have the money left over to do things like social security, or health care for the poor, let alone defense.

Cutting spending is thankless, because all spending benefits *someone.*  (Often corrupt leftists.)  If Trump loses most of the lawsuits, no president will ever have the courage to try to cut spending, and of course corrupt congress won't, so the U.S. will go bankrupt.
   The alternative is that young men--men who love the U.S. and aren't corrupt, like much of congress, could take matters into their own hands.
 
Either of those two would be rough, and I'm certainly not advocating war, but at least war would bring the corruptocrats to justice--something not currently possible-- and would almost certainly result in considerably fewer deaths.
    
Unfortunately I don't see a 3rd possibility.  If any of you do, I'd love to hear it.

Again, regardless of what happens I won't be around to see it, and don't have kids, but I thought it would have been negligent not to let y'all know what I see as the only possible outcomes of the current set of facts if the Supreme Court sides with the leftist/Democrat lower-court judges and blocks most of Trump's efforts to cut spending.