When will Porridgebrain announce he won't seek the Dem nomination?

The Hill is a rabidly pro-Dem website.  It just ran a piece that essentially began "Democrats are desperately trying to distract the attention of the American people from President Biden’s age, his obvious frailty and his increasing verbal and mental gaffes."

The author says he doesn't think Biden will be the Democratic nominee in 2024.  Wow, who saw that coming, eh?  Other than anyone with an IQ over 90.

Now, one of the things you can absolutely count on is that the Democrat machine running the White House will absolutely ridicule such speculation--right up until the very moment they dump the clearly corrupt vegetable for a younger candidate.

So the question is: when is the best time for Porridgebrain to announce that "It is with great sadness that I announce that on the advice of my doctors I will not seek my party's nomination"?

The fake Republican author of the piece wants to give the Dems advice that will give the Democrat party the best chance to "retain" the presidency, so he suggests "immediately."

He makes a good case, but the Democrats are more skilled at this sort of thing.  They know allowing voters to think biden will be the nominee for as long as possible has LOTS of advantages: One is that if the Republicans criticize biden's age and obvious decline in mental acuity, replacing him totally negates all those critiques.

The last president to decline to run for re-election was Lyndon B. Johnson in 1968.  Between race riots burning down American cities and the grim news every day from Vietnam, Johnson's approval rating was around 36 percent--which is likely where biden's really is today.  (Spoiler for young Americans: you cannot trust any opinion poll.  They all lie.)

I watched this history unfold as a college senior.  Johnson looked ancient to me.  In fact he was 59.  That's 21 years younger than Porridgebrain is today.

Porridgebrain won't be the eventual Dem nominee (though they might initially nominate him and then fake a stroke after the convention, which would trigger a sympathy vote and also allow all sorts of chicanery in naming the real nominee).

Here's another thing you can be sure of:  barring a stroke, biden won't make the decision not to seek the nomination.  If he had any self-awareness he would already have resigned--after getting a promise from Cackles to pardon his entire family.

Instead the decision on when he'll announce he won't seek the nomination will be made--as all other decisions have been--by the handful of people running the Democrat party--the folks who've been running the country since January of 2021.  When they decide on the day, they'll tell him he's done a faaabulous job, defeated duh Orange Man and deserves to relax with his grandchildren--at least the ones he claims.

Question is, in that case who will the Dems nominate?  Everyone who thinks it'll be Cackles, please stand up.

No one?  Wow, I'm shocked!  Obviously not.  Cackles was clearly selected as VP to get more female votes and black votes.  She's a complete moron--a diversity hire, and also biden's insurance against impeachment (though with the Dems having 52 senators, conviction and removal was never possible).  

So now here's the most perfect irony I've seen in years: After Cackles helped the Dems get the 74 million votes from legal, living Americans that the party actually won in 2020--and since then has made the U.S. even more of a laughingstock than Joe has--the Dems have to find a way to get her NOT to run.

And how they do that is gonna be worth watching.

They have to make her a sweet enough offer to enable the party to avoid the appearance of throwing her overboard, meaning cash alone won't do.  Which means offering her a position with enough glitter and cash.  Any bets?  U.N. rep?

Imagine that conversation!  "Kamala, you've done a great job, and certainly the voters love you, but we don't think you can win.  It's that darn right-wing smear machine, just like they sank Hilliary (pbuh).  But we've got a reeeally important position for you..."  

So who will be the Dem nominee?

The Hill author mentions the obvious: California governor Gavin Newsom, but also adds Pete Buttigieg and even Michelle Obama.  The last two are there simply to add fake suspense to an easy forecast--though either could be a VP choice.

So...easy-peasy: All the Democrats have to do is get rid of Cackles without alienating either blacks or women voters.  Wait, what was I thinking?  When you have the voting machines rigged you can "fix" alienating 100,000 voters with a single digit.

https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fthehill.com%2Fopinion%2Fcampaign%2F4086058-when-is-the-optimal-time-for-biden-to-drop-out-of-the-race%2F