Biden regime files suit to FORCE all states to allow minors to "transition"--including surgery

After seeing all the horror stories of minors being fed hormones by warped, greedy doctors, then mutilated by warped, greedy surgeons, 20 states have decided enough is enough, and have passed laws against anyone trying to "transition" a kid under 18.

One of those states is Tennessee.

And once again the biden regime has shown its DEMAND that minors be allowed to "transition," by suing to overturn the Tennessee law, forcing that state (and thus all states) to allow minor children to be given cross-sex hormones and then be medically mutilated in the holy name of transgenderism.

Today the Justice Department filed a complaint challenging Tennessee Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), a recently enacted law that denies necessary medical care to youth based solely on who they are.

This is a cunning word game: Imagine the biden regime saying "We've filed suit to overturn the state's law that restricts drivers' licenses to those 16 and over, because it  denies peoples' rights based solely on who they are.  You could complain that ANY law does "denies peoples' rights based solely on who they are" in the sense that all laws prohibit some sort of behavior, but it's sophistry:  

States have always had the right to restrict minors from certain things--driving.  Drinking alcohol.  Voting.  Even getting married.  Having sex.  (Dem: "Shriek!  Dat's a 'basic human right!)  But now the biden regime wants to prevent states from doing that in this case--because Democrats are so determined that kids as young as seven be allowed to go tranny. (That's what the White House said in a statement.)  Every Democrat candidate should be asked whether he or she agrees with that statement.

The complaint alleges that SB 1’s ban on providing certain *medically necessary care to transgender minors* violates the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. The department is also asking the court to issue an immediate order to prevent the law from going into effect on July 1.

The claim "medically necessary" is an unsupported assertion.  The tranny mafia claim that minors who do NOT "transition" have a higher risk of suicide, but other studies have shown that suicide rates are also higher among trannies who DID "transition"--suggesting that trannies are more prone to suicide regardless of whether they "transition."  So "medically necessary" is absolutely unproven.  But it sounds so convincing.

SB 1 makes it unlawful to provide or offer to provide certain types of medical care for transgender minors with diagnosed gender dysphoria. SB 1’s blanket ban prohibits potential treatment options that have been recommended by major medical associations **for consideration in limited circumstances**  in accordance with established and comprehensive guidelines and standards of care.

"For consideration in limited circumstances" is inserted to disarm the gullible: "limited" means sex-change hormones and surgery would be given to any tranny who demands it. "In accordance with established...guidelines" means unsupported assertions made by the tranny mafia and their corrupt, perverted supporters in the medical field.

By denying only transgender youth access to these forms of medically necessary care while allowing non-transgender minors access to the same or similar procedures, SB 1 discriminates against transgender youth.

The law isn't limited to trannies, but bars sex-change procedures to ALL minors.  Certainly NON-trannies wouldn't seek those procedures, so it does have more implact on trannies.  But "disparate impact" arguments, though they've been successful in some courts, can be used to force ANY law to be overturned: "Dis law has put more [members of one class] in jail, so mus' be overturned!"  No.  All laws penalize those who break them (unless you're a Democrat).  This is sophistry: The regime's actions in suing to overturn the right of every state to restrict certain things from minors so clearly exceeds the authority of the feds that they had to claim something that would distract from their egregious overreach.  Wailing that Tennessee's law "discriminates against transgender youth" does that.

The department’s complaint alleges that SB 1 violates the Equal Protection Clause by discriminating on the basis of both sex and transgender status.

Claims like the one above show how much the regime has to lie to make people buy their horseshit: the law makes NO distinction on the basis of sex, but prohibits cross-sex hormones, puberty blockers and sex-change operations for both sexes.  Yet the regime claimed "sex discrimination"?  On what basis?  They're just lying--claiming anything to distract you from the overreach.

“No person should be denied access to necessary medical care just because of their transgender status,” said Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke."

Imagine Kristen saying "No person should be denied the right to drink a legal product solely because they're under 16.  This is discrimination."  Or how about "No person should be denied the right to have sex with whoever they want, regardless of age." In both cases the absurdity is immediately obvious.

“[Tennessee's new law] violates the constitutional rights of some of Tennessee’s most vulnerable citizens,” said U.S. Attorney Henry Leventis.

Ah, the emotional plea, "...harms some of our most vulnerable citizens."  Imagine Henry using the same reasoning to support overturning state laws against underage drinking, driving, incest, and sex between a 40-year-old and a 12-year-old.  And spare me the "slippery slope" defense: I'm pointing out that the reasoning is flawed--unless you accept that states have no right to limit minors from anything.

On March 31, 2022, assistant attorney-general Clarke issued a letter to all state attorneys general reminding them of federal constitutional and statutory provisions that protect transgender youth against discrimination.

Just so we're clear, there is NO law giving trannies "specially-protected" status in Title IX.  The biden regime was unable to get its corrupt congresswhores to amend Title IX to give trannies the same status as "or sex."  So NO law.  So failing that, Porridgebrain issued an Executive ORDER decreeing that his regime would interpret Title IX as giving trannies that status.  He then ORDERED his lackeys in the fucking Dept of Education to issue rules to all schools based on his decree.  So Clarke's letter citing "statutory provisions" is a lie, and a bluff.  But you'll believe it, because she said it.  This is how corrupt they are.

If an adult wants to go tranny and get surgery, fine.  But minors are known to make decisions based on peer pressure or parental pressure or just plain stupidity.  It's why we don't let 'em drink alcohol or let under-16's drive cars.  It's why virtually every state prohibits adults from having sex with kids under 18.  You wanna repeal those laws?  Yet that's the argument the Dem regime is using here. 

"Reporters" (ha!) and Republican candidates should ask every Democrat candidate if they agree with that argument.