Student newspaper at Princeton prints a piece demanding end to no-cheating rules, cuz "unfair to minorities"

When a student-run newspaper at a high-end university prints articles bleating that rules against cheating need to be abolished--specifically because they disproportionately harm minorities--you know whoever wrote the piece is a corrupt, anti-American POS.  Meaning they'll be leaders of the Democrat party in a couple of years--just as Obama rose from zero to preznit with no accomplishments whatsoever.

Princeton University ranks alongside Harvard and Yale as a high-prestige institution.  So it was a bit surprising when the student paper published this piece by moronic communist "Emily Santos," bleating that the no-cheating rule should be abolished.

The University should lead by example by dismantling the Honor Code system, which acts as a barrier to social mobility and a more equitable society.  Only after such internal injustices are addressed can we make real-world changes.

Didja get that?  Translation: "Not allowing students to cheat is a barrier to an equitable society"!

Previous reporting on the Honor Code has shown the negative effects of the Honor Code process on FLI students. There can be financial, social, and academic repercussions.

"Academic repercussions," ya say?  Well no shit, Sherlock.  Dat be why you're not sposeta cheat, eh?  Well, other than the fact that cheating is unethical.

When caught up in the Honor Code system, FLI students may not have the institutional knowledge on how to navigate such a process in the same way their white and wealthier counterparts might.

"How to navigate" the "process" of "being caught up in the Honor Code system," eh?   "Being caught up, eh?  Let's see: Did some white raaaacist force you to cheat?  Nah, didn't think so.  You did it all by yourself, and now you're whining that you've been caught?  Wow.

But actually Emily has a good point:  America as watched Hunter Biden and his corrupt father cheat for decades to enrich themselves illegallly, and not a single Leftist/Democrat is the least bit upset about that.  Indeed, I see a story today that Hunter's Democrat allies are considering starting a fund to help pay his legal expenses to swat away charges related to his illegal activities.  

So if duh "preznit" and his crack-head son can cheat without penalty, it's understandable that Emily Santos would feel minorities are entitled to do the same.

Wow, who could have predicted THAT, eh?

 By the way, if you're not a diversity pusher you probably aren't familiar with that acronym "FLI," eh?  That's a deliberate camouflage by the author.  It stands for "first-generation low-income" students, and they use it because it doesn't attract as much pushback as using "minority students," which is the real concern.  That's clear from the contrast she draws to the "victims'" "white counterparts" in the last 'graf.

I kept thinking Emily's article just HAD to be satire, cuz it was SUCH a cliche for what the D-I-E crowd is demanding.  See, if we don't allow minorities to cheat in college, how can we ever have an equitable society, eh?