What major rule changes if a bill that goes to "reconciliation" is ruled to be a "budget bill"?

Hey, you're a well-informed American, right?  So what does it mean when the Democrats say they intend to pass a pork-loaded bill "by reconciliation"?

It sounds so happy and cheerful, eh?  Nothing could possibly be wrong with "reconciliation," eh?  When the House and senate versions of a bill differ, each chamber appoints three negotiators who sit down with the three from the other chamber and negotiate the actual final language of the soon-to-be law.

But it's much worse than you think.  First, there are NO transcripts of the negotiations, meaning if a ghastly piece of obvious corruption gets in, the public can never learn what corruptocrat did it.  Second, there are NO RESTRICTIONS AT ALL on what the negotiators can put in the final bill.  So if the House version approved $500 Billion for X, and the senate only $400 billion, the final bill could say $800 billion--no limits, and no transcripts to tell who did it or why.

But that's not the worst part.  Because the Dems are claiming their latest "Global Warming" porkfest of a bill is a "budget bill," which vastly changes the rules of the game.  Know how?

Sure ya do, cuz you're a well-informed American, right?  And if you don't know, ask your parents, and your professors.  See if *anyone* knows.

Okay, time's up.  What big rule changes if a bill is ruled to be a "budget bill" and goes to "reconciliation"?

Answer: The senate isn't allowed to use the filibuster.  Which means only a simple majority is needed to pass the bill.  

So do you think that since the senate is divided exactly 50-50, the bill won't pass?

Hahahahahaha!  Did your highschool even teach civics?  Because as every American should know, if a vote ties in the senate the vice-president is allowed to vote.  And that would be...Cackles.

So...unless one Democrat senator breaks party discipline (spoiler: Democrat senators almost never vote against their party, since that risks losing funding from the national committee next election), the bill will become law in two weeks.

I hear my liberal friends cheering--"Yay, Democrats win again!"  And I hear Republicans scrambling to grovel and beg and horse-trade to get a piece of the graft and corruption for their state.  Because this bill is LOADED with graft and corruption, as I detailed here.

Clever Democrats, eh?  If you wanna give your donors a BILLION-dollar grant (i.e. gift--which ensures they'll give you back a few million in "campaign contributions" to your "political-action committee"), put that grift provision in a budget bill, and with the senate under Dem control it will automatically pass.  And Democrats feel this is perfectly fine.

Source.

Graft and corruption in the bill: