Supreme Court refuses to hear appeal from Maine health-care workers ordered to take the jab by Dem governor

Last August the Democrat governor of Maine--Janet Mills--ordered all health-care workers in that state to take the jab or be fired.  The health-care workers filed suit, claiming the ORDER violated their Constitutional rights,specifically in refusing to recognize their religious beliefs.

A federal district judge--Jon Levy, appointed by Obama--RULED that the governor's ORDER was perfectly legal--didn't violate ANY right stated or implied in the Constitution.  Levy RULED that the mandate was “narrowly tailored to serve the compelling interest of containing the spread of this serious communicable disease.”  

"Narrowly tailored," eh?  Well in that case everthing's peachy. It's fine to take away a person's right as long as it's just a few tens of thousands of people, cuz that's "narrowly tailored."

We're only going to force *some* of you to take the jab.  Got it.

The workers appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Yesterday the so-called "justices" on the that court refused to hear that appeal, which leaves the governor's corrupt, unconstitutional order in place.

The state's Attorney General--yet another Democrat--claimed the ORDER is "critical for the protection of patients, healthcare workers, and Maine’s healthcare system against COVID.”  No reporter bothered to ask if the mandated jab prevented people from getting covid, which was always the definition of a "vaccine" until last September, when the CDC changed the definition.

Dictatorial Democrat governor Mills said that the lower courts were correct in finding her ORDER likely doesn't violate the First Amendment, describing the order as "not designed to infringe or restrict a particular religious practice” and necessary to achieve herd immunity.

Of course even a cursory reading of the First Amendment shows that "not designed to infringe on a *particular* religious practice" isn't the test.  Mills uses this line to make the ORDER less offensive to her supporters.

(For any amateur lawyers out there: Yes, I know the 1A says "Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or the free exercise thereof," so someone will argue that since that only applies to "congress" then the governor of Maine is free to issue an ORDER violating the free exercise of religion.  No.  There's a thing called the "supremacy clause" that says fed law overrides state and local laws.  So a governor can't *legally* issue an ORDER--nor can a state legislature make a state law--doing something the Constitution forbids.  Got it?)

And about Mills's bullshit that taking the jab is "necessary to achieve herd immunity."  Really?  No, because Her fascist ORDER does NOT exempt people who have HAD covid, and are thus naturally immune.  But she counts on people being to dumb to realize that.  Typical Democrat mislead.

So...thanks to a Dem governor, a Dem judge and a corrupt supreme court, governors can issue orders violating religious freedom, and the fucking supreme court won't say a word.

Rights you thought you had, but that aren't enforced, might as well not exist.  They don't really exist, except on paper.

You're about to see a huge demonstration of that, as the corrupt biden regime crushes the Freedom Convoy here in the U.S. to prevent it from reaching D.C.  Remember, you read it here first.