Big Pharma company files for approval for a new pill to treat Covid ! Contains mystery ingredient...

Hey citizen, didja hear the news?  One of the big pharma companies has applied for a patent on a new pill to treat duh Chyna virus!

The company is Merck, which until now hasn't made billions from the plandemic, so they found a way to get their nose in the trough.  They're seeking "emergency use authorization" from the FDA to get the red pill out to the public in record time.

And the beauty of it is, they don't need to do any trials on it!

Yep, See, every ingredient is already FDA-recognized as "safe."  Now all they need to do is show the pill helps treat duh virus.  We'll get to that in a minute.

They're reportedly making ten-MILLION of those red pills, reportedly slated to cost just over $200 per pill.  If those numbers are right that'd be a cool $2 BILLION in revenue.

Merck calls the new drug Molnupiravir©, and it'll supposedly be marketed under the amusing tag-line "Take the Red Pill"©--an ironic line from the movie "The Matrix."  (Taking the red pill woke you up to reality, and was pretty much a one-way trip.)

So what's in this new pill?  Reportedly the active ingredients are:
   Doxycycline, 100 mg (decades-old antibiotic)
   Elemental zinc 300 mg
   Vitamin D-3 10,000 iu 

But those are so...normal.  Wait, I see there's one more thing: 18mg of something called "Stromectol."

I've never heard of that, but since the other 3 ingredients are so normal, Stromectol must be the secret ingredient that gives this pill the power to knock out this dread virus, eh?  Wonder what it is?

Maybe the Internet knows.  Yep, it's...wait, this can't be right.  Stromectol turns out to be...Ivermectin!

Gosh, you mean those of us who have been pushing zinc, D-3, ivermectin and any normal antibiotic were right all along?  Wow.

Merck's filing for approval of this "new" drug now sets up an amusing battle:  The FDA has been absolutely sneering at ivermectin for over a year now, claiming it's "not FDA-approved."  Of course that's not exactly true.  The FDA approved it for human use way back in 1996.  They just haven't approved it for treating duh Chyna virus.  But they worded their sneering tweets to make you THINK the drug wasn't approved for human use, but only for de-worming horses.  

What cunning rat-bastards, eh?

So having sneered at it for over a year, how can they now totally reverse course and approve it for treating covid without raising some REALLY harsh questions?  Cuz they absolutely knew it was safe, since otherwise they would have approved it for human use in 1996, right?

So approval will have to hinge on "efficacy:"  Does it cure covid?  Of course us li'l people have been showing anecdotal evidence for months, but the FDA simply sneered.  Maybe Merck will have better luck.  But then someone in the FDA--probably some poor GS-4 secretary--will have to explain why the "experts" at the FDA dismissed an effective treatment in favor of a far-less-effective vax.

And all the Democrats who've loudly, viciously supported Biden's ORDER that 100 million American workers take the risky vax or be fired will have to explain why they were happy to do that instead of opening their damn eyes to REAL science!

But the REAL hoot will be if the drug is approved, and 183 million Americans who've taken the jab realize what they did to themselves by following the orders of duh regime.

I predict this will start to make its way into the news around May of next year--just in time for the mid-term election!  Love it!