The biden*fail regime has used the CDC to rule that landlords don't have any property rights

When a regime with total control over a country is determined to take away your rights, they usually don't do it all at once.  Instead they're usually cunning enough to do it by increments.

At the order of whoever's running the biden*fail regime, the CDC just issued an ORDER eliminating property rights.  But because they claimed that ORDER was necessary to "safeguard public health," you didn't understand what the order really did, so you didn't object.  

In fact, unless you own rental property, you didn't even notice.

Specifically the CDC--acting on the orders of the biden*fail regime--extended the agency's earlier order barring landlords from evicting tenants for nonpayent of rent.

"Wait, you right-wing terrorist...that order does not in any way 'eliminate property rights'!  You can still own rental property, as always!  You just can't evict people who don't pay the agreed rent.  You're just trying to complain about our wonderful president and his brilliant administration!"

Ah.  Let's re-read that a few times, until the inherent contradictions become more evident.

Sure, if you own rental property you still technically own it.  You sure as hell have to pay taxes on it.  But if the regime can bar you from evicting people who don't pay the rent they agreed to pay when they signed the lease, you don't actually have any authority over it.

Get it?

Of course you don't believe the CDC issued such an order, eh?  I mean, how the hell did the CDC get the authority to bar landlords from evicting non-paying tenants?   Obviously this story has to be a "tinfoil-hat conspiracy theory," eh?  Cuz you can still own your own house, car and other property, right?

Go back and re-read the opening sentence.  When a government wants to take away your rights, they do it in small steps, so the serfs don't revolt and kill the dictators.

But that communist rat-bastard (and Obozo's chief of staff) Rahm Emmanuel set the Democrats' course when he said "Never let a good crisis go to waste," eh? 

Let's look at the details:  Last September the CDC issued a DECREE--supposedly pursuant to the authority given the CDC by a federal law pertaining to disease control--that landlords could not evict people for not paying their rent until the end of 2020.  It was called a "moratorium" on evictions. 

A group of people who owned rental property quickly filed a lawsuit claiming the DECREE was unConstitutional.  On May 5th of this year a federal judge agreed that the CDC did not have the authority to impose a national moratorium.  But by this time the biden*harris regime had been installed, and they supported the eviction ban, so the regime's army of tax-funded lawyers appealed.  And also asked the judge to "stay" his ruling to give the regime time to file and perfect its appeal.  

The judge granted the motion.  So...ruling that CDC exceeded its authority has no effect.

I know you'll be shocked to learn that a 3-judge panel on a federal court of appeals agreed with the regime, upholding the CDC ban on evictions.  And in March the biden*fail regime extended the ban on evictions until June 30th.

The plaintiffs appealed to the Supreme Court.  And just as the court declined to hear the lawsuit by the state of Texas claiming election fraud, on June 29th the court sided with the biden*fail regime and upheld the eviction ban.  Even though Kavanaugh wrote that he believed the CDC lacked the authority to issue its decree, he shrugged it off by saying the CDC had promised it wouldn't try to extend the ban past June 30th, so the issue was moot.

Can you guess what happened next?  Sure ya can!

The CDC promptly extended the ban to July 31st.  But they promised --really!--that that extension would be the last one.  Really!  And you had to believe 'em cuz that Rochelle Walensky (a professor selected by the regime to be a reliably pliant director of the CDC) is reely reely smaht, eh?  Surely she wouldn't lie, would she?

So as July 31st--the date the promised "last extension" would expire--approached, can you guess what happened ?  

Sure you can!  On August 3rd the CDC extended the eviction ban yet again, this time to October 3rd. 

Say, how are those solemn promises from the CDC and regime not to keep extending the ban working out, eh?  How many times will they keep extending the ban after saying they wouldn't?

Ah, but THIS TIME was different!  Cuz the prior bans had applied to the whole country, but this time the cunning CDC director ruled that THIS one would only apply to parts of the country that had a reely reely HIGH incidence of ghastly Chinese virus cases.  Cases.  Even if asymptomatic, so not requiring hospitalization.  Cases, comrade.  As determined by the useless PCR test!

So according to the CDC what portion of the U.S. is affected by the "moratorium"--ostensibly because the affected area has a really high incidence of people hospitalized by the Chinese virus?  A quarter?  Maybe 40 percent?

Guess again.  The ban covers 90 percent of the country.  So after the court said the CDC lacked the authority to impose a ban on the whole country, but that they'd let it stand for the two days until it expired (only to have it extended again), the new CDC DECREE covers just...90% of the country.

Say, that's clever!  No one will ever realize that the CDC has defied the court, eh?

So...can you predict what will happen next?

Sure you can! 

Now:  After virtually every Democrat governor locked down their citizens--thus shutting down most businesses and killing what had been a booming economy for a virus with a 99.9% recovery rate for people without "co-morbidities," barring landlords from evicting non-paying tenants may have been a good idea.  But as Kavanaugh wrote, that was a call that only congress had the power to make.

And here's where it all comes together:  Because the Dems control both chambers and the presidency, Pelosi and Schumer had the votes to pass an eviction moratorium--which they knew would please their socialist base.  But they also knew ramming through such a law would show Americans that the Democrats were happy to kill property rights to do it.  

Pelosi and Schumer didn't want to be blamed for that, so their solution was to get an unelected appointee to do their work for them, even if the move was unConstitutional.

And it worked:  Dem voters (far more likely to be young renters) are delighted, and Dems won't get any blame for effectively killing property rights.  If there's pushback, they'll blame Rochelle Walensky.

Hey, never let a good crisis go to waste, eh?

Source.