Biden*fail regime increasing pressure for everyone to take the jab; here's what you should know

The regime's actions re the Chinese virus just keep getting stranger.

After biden*fail said he wanted teams of people to go door-to-door to pressure unvaxxed people to take the jab, his ghastly press secretary referred  to  the  such teams as “strike forces.”  Then after Fauci told the mainstream media that “at  the  local  level...there  should  be  more  mandates," Psaki announced that  the  Biden  Administration  would  support state and local "vaccine mandates."  They were clearly trying to shift the blame to states and cities, away from their own regime.

The CDC knows that when someone has an "adverse reaction" to a vax, only about one percent of those "adverse events" are reported to the government's "VAERS" database.  But based on events reported to VAERS, the CDC claims adverse effects after COVID-19  vaccination occurred  in  approximately 2 to 5 Americans per million taking the vax.  But a recent study by Mass General Brigham found “severe reactions consistent with anaphylaxis occurred at a rate of 2.47 per 10,000 vaccinations."

Average American thinks "What's the problem?  After all that's near the low end of the range reported by the CDC, right?"  

Of course if you're even remotely competent with math you recognized that that's not even close:  The CDC claim--based on events reported to VAERS--is per *million* vaccinations, but the Mass General study was per *10,000.*  Converting that to "per million" would be 100 times higher, or 247 adverse reactions per million.

"Wait," say Democrats, "that's simply un-possible!  The gruberment would never force Americans to take a vax with such a huge rate of adverse effects!  Simply not possible!" 

Yeah, you'd think.  Except it's true.

But wait, it gets worse:  As evidence that the CDC doesn't want the public to know the true risks of the vax, consider that the CDC has created a parallel system--a smartphone app called “V-Safe”--just for reporting adverse reactions to the covid vaxxes.  See, only doctors can report "adverse events" to the VAERS system, and surveys have shown only about one percent of adverse effects are reported.  But anyone with the app who had an adverse reaction to the vax could report his/her reaction using the app.  
Great idea, eh?  So what is this great "V-safe" app showing? 

Sorry, since V-Safe is totally controlled by the CDC, only the CDC knows--and as you already guessed, they're not saying.  That should ring some alarm bells.

Now consider this:  Federal law requires that so-called vaccines with "Emergency Use Authorization" can only be administered to people if they give "informed consent."  Obviously such consent isn't possible without a full understanding of risks involved.

Obviously the CDC and FDA are well aware of this law, yet those agencies are actively hiding the risks of getting the vax.  Rational Americans should wonder why those agencies are deliberately failing to disclose critical information regarding the risk of taking one of the vaxxes.  This failure is particularly egregious in light of the fact that both agencies have had the time and resources to identify the risks of the vaxxes.  But instead of informing Americans, they've built an enormous marketing machine to push everyone to get the vax, regardless of risk.

Now let's look at your kids--because within the next couple of months the dictators will *demand* that your kids take the jab:  CDC data shows that children under 18 rarely even test positive for the Chinese virus--even using the notoriously-unreliable PCR test.  Of those few who do test positive, 99.998% recover **even with no treatment.**  This contrasts with over 45,000 deaths (see below) and hundreds of thousands of adverse events reported following injection with the vaccines. 

So children under 18 have no statistically significant risk of harm from the virus.  So why in the world would the regime demand that your 10-year-old be injected with an untested "vaccine," eh?  From a risk standpoint, it makes no sense.  And yet the regime is exerting HUGE pressure to force that as a condition of allowing your kid to go back to school.  

Of course being cunning Democrats, for now the leaders of the regime are letting the states force this, so that when voters' kids have..."adverse effects"--the regime will be able to claim that it wasn't their fault since the states actually did the forcing. 

No doubt that will be very comforting.  And the Mainstream Media will never call the Dem leaders to account for their forced-vax push.   

Forcing anyone 18 and under to take the vax knowingly, intentionally exposes them to unnecessary and unacceptable risks.

The extremely limited, short-duration trials of the vaxxes did not include a single person under 18, yet the FDA is allowing children as young as 12 years old to take the vax.  Never before have we allowed medications that hadn't won full FDA approval to people who weren't initially in the trials--let alone *forced* parents to have their children take an experimental vax.

Meanwhile local governments are quietly passing laws--and even more often rogue school boards are decreeing RULES--allowing kids to be vaxxed without parental consent, and sometimes even parental knowledge.  Children have a well-known,  scientifically studied vulnerability to pressure  from peers and adults. This age group is particularly susceptible to pressure to do what others tell them is "the right thing to  do—in  this  case to take the injection “to keep others safe."

Another indication that something other than public safety is behind the regime's push to force everyone to take the vax is our experience with the 1976 swine flu: There was a vaccine then, and a huge campaign to push Americans to take it.  But as now, the vax killed some of those who took it.

After just 53 deaths the swine flu vaccine was declared unsafe and taken off the market.  By contrast, official reports claim 9,000 have died from the current vaxxes.  Moreover, according to a government whistleblower with full access to Medicare and Medicaid data, the real number of deaths is likely five times higher.  Yet no government agency has raised the idea of taking the current vaxxes off the market.  Clearly something other than concern for public health is at work here.

Finally:  By law, the Secretary of "Health and Human Services" can ONLY issue an  Emergency Use Authorization if there is no adequate, approved and available alternative to the vax.  But in the case of the Chinese virus many safe and readily available treatment options exist.  These alternatives are supported by over 300 studies, including randomized controlled studies. Tens of thousands of physicians  have publicly attested to their safety and efficacy.  These include Ivermectin,  Budesonide,  Dexamethasone,  convalescent  plasma  and  monoclonal  antibodies,  Vitamin D, Zinc, Azithromycin and Hydroxychloroquine.  Most were approved decades ago (80 years ago for HCQ) and all are far safer than the COVID-19 Vaccines.

This alone should have made it illegal for the corrupt regime to issue EUA's in the first place.  Yet they did it anyway.  Clearly, something other than health is at work.

Facebook has deleted any posts even remotely critical of the vax, or mentioning any of the therapeutic agents listed agove.  Doctors have been banned for posting or tweeting screenshots from the government's own VAERS website.

Even medical journals are blocking the publication of papers critical of vax dangers, or reporting positive results from any of the treatment options above.  The four founding topic editors of the journal "Frontiers in Pharmacology" all  resigned because they weren't allowed to publish peer reviewed scientific data on alternative drugs for treatment of the virus.

Clearly, something other than concern for health is driving all this.  You might want to ask what it is.

Source.

https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/3c6a0774-cfad-46fa-aa97-af5aa5e74f00/M%20for%20PI%20file%20stamped.pdf