Are effective COVID treatments being suppressed so vax makers can sell under the EUA?

In January of 2020, just after the Chinese virus hit the U.S, we heard about an inexpensive drug called hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) that showed great potential to treat Covid infection.  Not only was HCQ inexpensive, it had been approved by the FDA about 70 years earlier to treat malaria.  It had been taken by millions of American soldiers in WW2 and billions of people since.  It had virtually no side-effects.

A French doctor published two studies which showed amazing results of hcq, zinc and azithromycin. Soon thereafter President Trump mentioned hcq in a press conference as a potential game changer.  

Anthony Fauci quickly dismissed those studies as “anecdotal,” instead repeatedly pushing a far more costly drug called remdesivir.

Trials outside of France soon began, but they reported hcq wasn't effective as a prophylaxis or as a treatment.  But in ALL those studies either the dosage was way too low to be effective, or way too high, leading to unusual EKGs, or it was only given to patients in severe crisis, too late to recover, or without zinc, which seemed to be crucial.

The Mainstream Media eagerly jumped at the chance to sneer at Trump for proposing what the MSM and Fauci were branding a crazy snake-oil "remedy."  Within a week or two anyone who mentioned hcq was viciously attacked.

Next a study was published in a prestigious medical journal claiming HCQ was ineffective and dangerous, causing cardiac-related complications.  Ongoing trials and testing were halted immediately, and the FDA issued a warning advising HCQ not be used to treat COVID.  

Up until then, the FDA allowed doctors to prescribe any drug it had approved to treat one illness to treat a different illness--called "off-label use."  But now for the first time the FDA specifically banned doctors from prescribing hcq for off-label use.  It was unprecedented--and with that all research and testing of HCQ immediately stopped.  Mission accomplished.

Keep in mind that this was a drug that had been approved by the FDA 70 years earlier and had been taken by billions of people with virtually no side-effects.  Yet suddenly someone at the FDA decided it was too dangerous.  But only when used to treat the China virus; the FDA still permitted hcq to be used to treat lupus and arthritis.  Clearly something very odd was afoot.

Months later an investigator analyzed the data in the major study noted above, and found it was completely fraudulent.  Yet it had passed peer-review without anyone noticing.  The study was retracted, but the damage had been done.  Again, mission accomplished.

With reported deaths from the virus nearing a million worldwide, no one suspected that the two events noted above--the FDA's ban on off-label use of hcq, and the fraudulent study supposedly showing it wasn't effective--were part of an effort to discredit the drug.  It didn't make sense.

Then in December of 2020 senator Ron Johnson (WI) held a hearing on potential treatment options for Covid-19.  Dr. Pierre Kory and some of the country’s top practitioners in their field formed a group at the outset of the pandemic to find existing medications to treat those with COVID.  Kory said they'd found success with an FDA-approved drug called Ivermectin.  Introduced in 1981, it's been taken by over 3 billion people as an antiparasitic agent.

But almost immediately, just as happened with hcq/zinc/azithromycin, articles began to appear debunking Ivermectin.  The group of doctors who brought news of the treatment to the public were attacked, censored, and ridiculed.  The effort was so intense that Google-owned YouTube even deleted the video of the Senate hearing describing the results.

Studies and trials proving Ivermectin’s effectiveness were suppressed and marginalized.  Clinical trials have been sabotaged using the same tactics as were used to dismiss studies claiming HCQ was effective.

But those powerful forces didn’t work everywhere.  You might remember that not long ago India was facing an overwhelming surge in cases and deaths.  Remdesivir was widely administered and failed miserably.  Faced with a crisis, Indian doctors were willing to defy WHO warnings and try Ivermectin.  The results were nothing short of miraculous.

With the successful results of India, the effectiveness of Ivermectin in treating COVID-19 is no longer debatable.  Anyone can see that it is every bit of effective as Dr. Kory described during the senate hearing in December of last year.  But despite the Indian success, our FDA and NIH continue to warn that Ivermectin isn't helpful in treating the virus.  If they claim there's a scientific or medical basis for dismissing the success of this approved drug, what is it?  They won't say.  Just "Not approved for use against Covid."

We know Ivermectin works, is inexpensive, approved by the FDA and widely available.  The obvious question is, Why are the FDA, CDC and WHO trying their best to suppress Ivermectin?

The reason seems to be related to Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).

When the FDA declares a "public health emergency" it's allowed to approve drugs and vaccines thought likely to be effective even if they haven't been fully tested.  The catch is, it can only issue an EUA *if there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives.*

As of tonight, all the "vaccines" for the China virus only have Emergency Use Authorization--which, again, by law is only permitted "if there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives.”  

HCQ and Ivermectin have been approved by the FDA.  Both are readily available.  So everything hinges on whether either is "effective."  If the CDC, FDA or NIH acknowledge that either is effective, the EUA wouldn't be legal, meaning no $26 BILLION in profits for one of the vax makers.  They'd also arguably lose their immunity from legal liability.  The vaccines would have to pass normal testing requirements before they could be used.  And before the biden regime could force all Americans to take the jab.

BTW: Tomorrow the FDA is likely to approve one or more of the vaccines for unrestricted use.

H/T Jim Hoft at Gateway Pundit