Hey, remember a story around last October...something about a laptop belonging to...nah, forget it

If a nation's top "law enforcement" agencies are corrupt, members of the party in power, and their families, can literally get away with anything.

Case in point: If you were halfway paying attention to national news just before last November's stolen election, you may vaguely remember some murmuring about a laptop belonging to...

Wait, silly me--last fall you were too busy studying for finals or raising your kids or struggling to keep your family fed during the moronic, useless (for preventing virus cases, at least) lockdowns to pay attention to distant, seemingly minor events--like the election.  So let's try another tack:

Think back to a week before the election:  Do you recall a news item about a laptop belonging to a powerful family that proved that family was up to their neck in crimes?

If you don't recall anything about that, the FBI, DOJ and mainstream media have once again done what they see as their job: ensuring Democrats win all power in the government.

The laptop belonged to Joe Biden's 51-year-old coke-addict son, Hunter.  It contained literally thousands of photos of Hunter cavorting with nude girls--but that isn't illegal, and isn't the problem.  The problem is, the laptop contained literally tens of thousands of emails to and from the coke-head, setting up business deals with foreign governments or foreign investors--in areas in which Hunter had zero experience or expertise.

A reasonable conclusion from that fact would be that the foreign governments or investors were buying influence with the now "president" of the U.S.  But of course Slow Joe has always strongly denied that he EVAH even talked with the crack-head about his business deals.  And certainly if foreign agents want to throw tens of millions of dollars at a cokehead, that's their privilege, eh?  There's no evidence that there was any attempt to bribe the "president" of the U.S.

Wait...there is:  In an email discussing how "equity" in one of the deal is to be awarded, the coke writes "...and ten percent for the Big Guy."

The identity of "the Big Guy" isn't further specified.  If we had an honest FBI and DOJ, federal agents would have resolved this question by putting Hunter under oath and asking "When you wrote that "the Big Guy" was to get ten percent of the venture, who were you referring to?"

Problem is, both the FBI and DOJ have been corrupt for decades, so they'd never depose Biden's son under oath.

So...the cokehead's laptop died, so he took it to a repair shop barely a mile from the Biden mansion in Delaware.  Then, as drug addicts are prone to do, he forgot about it.  The shop owner called the number Hunter left on the ticket to tell him his laptop was ready for pickup, but no one ever anwered or returned his voice message.

So in accordance with state law, after 90 days the shop owner took possession of the laptop.  He then found all the emails and pics noted above.  The owner immediately realized the evidence on the laptop was explosive, and a potential game-changer.

Ooooh, what to do now, eh?  Since the shop owner was a good Democrat--and didn't want to anger the most powerful family in the state--releasing the contents to the Media was out of the question.  Same with releasing it to Delaware state cops.  So...what to do?

Ah!  Turn it over to the FBI!  And he did.  But the owner also knew what everyone with an IQ over room temperature knows: the FBI is corrupt, from top to bottom.  If you don't do what the Director orders--regardless of whether it's legal--you don't get promoted.  Knowing this, the owner was concerned that the FBI--supposedly the nation's "top law-enforcement agency"--would most likely  simply bury the evidence, so he... made a copy of the laptop's hard drive.

Ooooh.

Well...the FBI came to the shop and interviewed the owner.  When the owner showed the "agents" a copy of the repair ticket, signed by Joes' cokehead son, the agents demanded that the owner turn it over to them.  The owner declined, but offered to make them a copy.  They bitched and threatened, but in the end they took the copy.

That was in 2019.  The owner kept waiting to hear about indictments, or at least that the FBI was investigating the contents.  Unsurprisingly, crickets.  So with the 2020 election nearing, the owner made other copies of the hard drive, one of which made it to the New York Post.  Which investigated, and when everything checked out, the Post ran the story--just two weeks before the election.

Is any of this ringing any bells yet?

So...should have been a huge story, right?

(If you disagree, try imagining how the story would have exploded if  "a laptop belonging to Joe Biden's son" was replaced by "a laptop belonging to one of Donald Trump's sons," eh?  It would have led the headlines in every newspaper all the way through the election, and you damn well know that's the truth.

But with the laptop belonging to Joe's cokehead son, how do you think the Mainstream Media covered the story?

Except for the Post and one Fox host, they ignored it.

But wait...it gets worse:  Fakebook and Twatter--horrified by the potential bombshell--locked the NY Post's accounts!  They even deleted all user posts that linked to the story on the  Post's website!

I am NOT kidding.

You may have heard that Fakebook and Twatter lock accounts of anyone who posts anything critical of the vax, or the gruberment's push to force kids as young as 2 to take the jab, or the push to get everyone to wear a mask EVEN if they've been vaccinated.  (If the vax actually immunized people against the virus, why would vaccinated people need to wear a mask, eh?)   Fakebook/Twatter claim all those posts are "disinformation."  Which is exactly the excuse they used to lock the Post's account.

But what about the laptop story, exactly, did Fakebook and Twatter claim was disinformation?  The laptop is real, as is the data on its drive.  It was true fact, but Fakebook and Twatter didn't want you or other Americans to see it--because it was damaging to their chosen party.

So here we are in the middle of 2021, about two years after the FBI seized the cokehead's bombshell laptop--but there has been no investigation.  Of course you already know why, but Tucker Carlson has the details of who gave the actual order to not investigate.  A corrupt U.S. attorney--i.e. an employee of the "Justice" department--David Weiss--did it.

 

According to the leftist shill-site Politico, Weiss killed any investigation "to avoid taking any action that could alert the public to the existence of the case" before the election.

It's hard to get more corrupt than this.

 

Weiss--a staunch Democrat--obviously wanted to help his party win, but also knew that if he ensured no investigation ever happened, Biden and company would owe him.  SO, watch 8 minutes of this video to see how corrupt the DOJ and FBI really are.

And lest you think Politico is criticizing Weiss and his corruption, the site notes that his decision was "a credit" to Weiss, and was done to "avoid politicizing the investigation."  Wait...WHAT?  Anyone with an IQ over 70 should instantly realize that when flaming evidence of corruption surfaces, ensuring no investigation is done is the very definition of "politicizing the investigation."

Example 675,386 of "Two sets of laws."  A lax set for the connected, a harsh one for ordinary citizens.