DC council votes to allow DC schools to hold your kid down and inject him/her with the vax--without your consent
I've written many posts about the fact that Twatter, Fakebook and Youtube won't let users post anything the government or the leftists who run those companies don't like. Fakebook immediately locks your account, and then says "If you want to get your account back you must delete the offensive post yourself."
Everyone with an IQ over 80 knew this "deplatforming" would get to the point where saying even the most innocuous things the gruberment didn't like would cause Fake and Twat to lock your account, or YT to delete vids it didn't like. We knew that soon if you simply quoted the CDC's own website, Fake would lock your account. Sure enough...
Latest case: Last month the dictators infesting the city council of Washington DC issued an ORDER, under which all DC schools would be empowered to hold 11-year-old kids down and inject them with the Emergency-Use-Only vax--without the parents' consent.
This should be the start of a shooting war. Seriously.
Well...a week later a family-rights group posted a video on YouTube discussing this ORDER. That video did NOT say "The vax is dangerous," or "Don't take the jab" but was simply a discussion of whether the DC city council had the right to authorize its public schools to inject children with an Emergecy-Use-Oney vax without the parents' permission.
You can guess what happened, right? Here in dictatorial, Dem-ruled America in 2021 it's not even a bit difficult.
YouTube deleted it, bleating that the video violated its policies on “medical misinformation.”
But the video contained no medical information or advice; instead it dealt with parental consent, and parental rights. (Of course in Dem-ruled America you may have noticed that parents have no rights whatsoever if they oppose any policy of the State regarding their children. In the Dems' view your job is just to house and financially support a State asset until said asset is old enough to vote Democrat.)
More outrageous yet, the Biden administration recently admitted--proudly--that it was helping Fakebook flag posts for faster removal. That is, they acknowledged what everyone already knew: that Fakebook was an official censorship agency of the regime. Seriously: Last week Jen Psaki said the White House was “flagging problematic posts for Facebook that spread disinformation.”
For those unfamiliar with a quaint piece of history called "the Constitution," the Founders said the federal government wasn't allowed to do that. But of course the Dems have ignored that document for decades.
In the United Soviet States of America in 2021, one party controls everything, and no one is allowed to post anything on social media that that party doesn't like. The companies that carry out this policy at the Dems' order lie outrageously, claiming that a discussion of whether the sky is actually blue is "misinformation," and they lock your account or delete your video.
Should be an outrage, but only a handful of Americans seem to find it outrageous.
Just as a mental exercise for stupid Democrats: Suppose Trump had plotted with big companies to prevent liberal views from appearing on social media. Suppose further that those companies called anything they deleted "misinformation" even if it was factual, or from the government's own figures. Would you think that was reasonable?
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home