As Arizona audit nears completion, what if...

As all of you should know, last November the Democrats were deemed to have won Arizona's 11 electoral votes, by a whisker-thin 11,000 votes or so.  But in that state's largest county there were so many reported "anomalies" that the Arizona state senate voted to conduct a "forensic audit" of that county's votes and voting machines.

For young Americans, a forensic audit is much different than a recount, because it examines ballots for "anomalies" that would suggest fraud--things like no folds ever having been made in ballots that were supposedly mailed to voters and then mailed back. 

The forensic audit of the actual ballots in Arizona's Maricopa county has been going on for about three weeks now, and is nearing completion.  The only word that's leaked about the results is that as many as 100,000 ballots may be...missing.  In place of those ballots are supposedly box after box of blank ballots.  If true, that's...nteresting.

Of course you'd think that since the Democrats claim they're sure biden*harris won Arizona, they'd welcome the audit as a chance to prove it.  But of course they've done the opposite, doing everything possible to block the thing, including refusing to turn over computer servers that tallied the votes.

As the audit nears completion, people interested in honest elections might be moved to think a bit: What happens if the audit finds that, say, 100,000 ballots that were tallied for Biden are missing?

Of course you already know the answer:  Nothing.  The Democrats will claim the missing ballots exist and were properly counted, but were probably stolen by...Trump supporters.  Or perhaps a new employee thought 100 boxes of Biden ballots were from a prior election and shredded them by mistake.

Yeah, dat's it.

So what would happen next?  You know the answer:  Nothing.  A month after the election the Supreme Court--in an unsigned order--refused even to hear a lawsuit by Texas against Pennsylvania claiming that state didn't follow its own laws for elections, thus enabled fraud.  No reason was offered.  So if Arizona were shown to flip, the SC would say--via an unsigned order--that even if the Arizona vote could be proven fraudulent, changing just one state wouldn't change the overall result. So the SC is absolutely, positively, guaranteed not to do anything.

So let's play one more hand:  Suppose Arizona, Georgia and Wisconsin were all audited, and all three were found to have actually been GOP wins.  (Georgia was called for biden*harris by 12,000 votes after astonishing, brazen indications of fraud.)  This would leave the electoral vote tied at 269 for each side.

You may be surprised to learn that the Founders anticipated such a possibility: the Constitution specifies the procedure.  So you'd think the argument that "It's only one state so it won't change the outcome" would fail, eh?

So what do you think would happen?  You know the answer:  Nothing.  Despite the majority of the SC justices being appointed by Republicans, all but two are plants--not at all conservative, just posing as conservative.  So the SC would issue yet another unsigned order stating they declined to hear the case.  And that's that.

What would happen next?  Surely no one thinks the military would do anything, since the Secretary of Defense is a black extremist who firmly supports Biden, and all generals who believed their job was to support and defend the Constitution have been replaced by "politically reliable" types.

What would happen then?  Would the American people revolt?  You already know the answer.  Americans have been conditioned--by 15 months of being confined to their homes, barred by threats of fines and jail from attending church or funerals of loved ones, and forced to wear masks at all times--to bear any injustice, any indignity, any loss of freedoms they thought they had.  They've been conditioned to obey, period.

And when the Democrats--knowing fraud is now unpunishable--repeat the steal in the midterms, then the 2024 elections, you know what will happen:  Nothing.