Democrats' "For the People Act"--that legalizes vote fraud--commands that any legal challenge must be filed in only one court. Why?

Suppose congress and the presidency were totally controlled, NOT by Democrats (as now) but by Republicans.  Suppose further that Republican members introduced a bill, pushed hard by all Republicans, with not a single Democrat amendment being allowed, that explicitly ordered that any legal challenge to its provisions could only be filed in ONE court--a court totally corrupted and controlled by Republicans for decades.  

Would that make you think the bill was a total power grab?

If you didn't reach that conclusion you're too damn dumb to breathe, and shouldn't be allowed to vote or breed.  And you probably think BidenHarris is a dreamy team to lead this poor nation.

Now to reality:  The Democrats have drafted a monstrous bill--the first bill they introduced:  H.R.1.  Like all Democrat totalitarian power grabs, this monster is cunningly mis-named to make it sound totally wonderful: they named it the "For the People Act," but what it really does is legalize every type of vote fraud the Democrats used to steal the 2020 election.  Not only that, it would force all states to follow its rules in their elections.

It's so stunning in its audacity that you have to try really hard to find a good analogy.  It's worse than if the Dems were to order every school in the nation to allow males to compete against girls in sports

Oh wait, the Dems already did that.  It's now U.S. law.  And in classic "Pravda" form, the Dems called that ghastly law the "Equality Act."

Seriously.  Doesn't that result just scream "equality"?   Well, unless you've got an actual daughter in sports--in which case you don't even know the Dems already rammed that son of a bitch into U.S. law, eh?

H.R.-1 is worse than if Democrats ordered taxpayers to pay for sex-change operations on trannies who joined the military.  Oh wait...the Democrats have already ordered that too.  Wow, too late again.

SO...with HR1 the Democrats know their ghastly, election-fraud-legalizing bill will be challenged in court, since the Constitution (anyone remember that poor document?) explicitly states that states shall control the manner of their elections.  (Feel free to look it up.)  So the Dems made certain that their power-grabbing, election-stealing bill contained a command that any legal challenge could only be filed and heard by ONE court:  The federal District Court for Washington DC.

Now go back and read the first paragraph above.  Why do you think the Democrats put this in their monstrous, power-grabbing, vote-fraud-legalizing bill?

It's obvious if you know that the Dems have controlled that court for decades.

They included this unprecedented order because they know their bill is unconstitutional, and they want to ensure that when it's challenged it will be in a court they control.

No political party in U.S. history has been this corrupt, this cunning, this lawless.  The Democrats who voted for HarrisBiden* did this.  And they're positively GLOATING about it.

Here's the damning language, from the Democrats' own mouths, right from the congress.gov site.  Try to parse it.  If you think it's deliberately opaque--using lots of dependent clauses and unknown references to hide its clear effect--you're right.  And that's no accident.  It's deliberate, done so that very few Americans can understand what it does.   And if you think I've faked this, click on this link and see for yourself.

SEC. 407. JUDICIAL REVIEW.

    (a) In General:  Notwithstanding section 373(f), if any action is
brought for declaratory or injunctive relief to challenge, whether
facially or as-applied, the constitutionality or lawfulness of any
provision of this Act or of chapter 95 or 96 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, or is brought to with respect to any action of the
Commission under chapter 95 or 96 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
the following rules shall apply:

            (1) The action shall be filed in the United States
        District Court for the District of Columbia and an appeal from
        the decision of the district court may be taken to the Court of
        Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

           (2) In the case of an action relating to declaratory or
        injunctive relief to challenge the constitutionality of a
        provision, the party filing the action shall concurrently
        deliver a copy the complaint to the Clerk of the House of
        Representatives and the Secretary of the Senate.

            (3) It shall be the duty of the United States District
        Court for the District of Columbia and the Court of Appeals for
        the District of Columbia Circuit to advance on the docket and
        to expedite to the greatest possible extent the disposition of
        the action and appeal.

    (b) Clarifying Scope of Jurisdiction:  If an action at the time
of its commencement is not subject to subsection (a), but an amendment,
counterclaim, cross-claim, affirmative defense, or any other pleading
or motion is filed challenging, whether facially or as-applied, the
constitutionality or lawfulness of this Act or of chapter 95 or 96 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or is brought to with respect to any
action of the Commission under chapter 95 or 96 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, the district court shall transfer the action to the
District Court for the District of Columbia, and the action shall
thereafter be conducted pursuant to subsection (a).

Now...I'm betting you didn't want to go to the trouble of trying to parse this ghastly piece of shit, so we'll use CrapDetector software to take out the crap and show ya what it actually does:

SEC. 407. JUDICIAL REVIEW.

    (a) In General:  Notwithstanding section 373(f), if any action is
brought for declaratory or injunctive relief to challenge, whether
facially or as-applied, the constitutionality or lawfulness of any
provision of this Act or of chapter 95 or 96 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, or is brought to with respect to any action of the
Commission under chapter 95 or 96 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
the following rules shall apply:
            (1) The action shall be filed in the United States
        District Court for the District of Columbia and an appeal from
        the decision of the district court may be taken to the Court of
        Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

           (2) In the case of an action relating to declaratory or
        injunctive relief to challenge the constitutionality of a
        provision, the party filing the action shall concurrently
        deliver a copy the complaint to the Clerk of the House of
        Representatives and the Secretary of the Senate.

            (3) It shall be the duty of the United States District
        Court for the District of Columbia and the Court of Appeals for
        the District of Columbia Circuit to advance on the docket and
        to expedite to the greatest possible extent the disposition of
        the action and appeal.

Translation:  The Dems want their controlled court to rule on any challenge immediately, so they can keep stealing elections starting right away.  Otherwise the case might drag on for years.

    (b) Clarifying Scope of Jurisdiction:  If an action at the time
of its commencement is not subject to subsection (a), but an amendment,
counterclaim, cross-claim, affirmative defense, or any other pleading
or motion is filed challenging, whether facially or as-applied, the
constitutionality or lawfulness of this Act or of chapter 95 or 96 of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or is brought to with respect to any
action of the Commission under chapter 95 or 96 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, the district court shall transfer the action to the
District Court for the District of Columbia, and the action shall
thereafter be conducted pursuant to subsection (a).

Now:  Obviously since the Democrats now control both chambers of congress, the president and the supreme court, this piece of shit is guaranteed to pass--without a single Republican amendment.  So why am I bothering to post this totally accurate analysis, since this piece of shit is guaranteed to become U.S. LAW?

I do it because so there's a small possibility that some future young American might see that all of the total one-party-rule the Democrats rammed through was predictable--and indeed, was predicted.  It was obvious.  All the evidence was there for anyone to see.  You haven't seen it because the Lying Mainstream Media doesn't want you to see it.

They can't make the language of the bill vanish (although I expect they'll eventually master that trick too), but they can just not tell you what it means.  So you'll never know.  Ever.  Because once the Dems ram this into LAW, no Republican will bother trying to challenge it, since the outcome is pre-ordained.

Is that cunning or what?

If I were the snowflake type I'd weep for your children and grandchildren--for what they've now lost, and for what many of them will suffer because of this Democrat power-grab.  

Think I'm kidding?  Suppose you've worked hard all your live, made great decisions and now have a net worth of nearly a million bucks.  You counted on being able to pass that along to your kids, right?

"Come on, man!"  Admit it.  You're a good person.  You've lived modestly, made great decisions, worked hard, didn't get into drugs or buying a new Lamborghini every few years.  Yes, you lived comfortably, but your big reward--or so you believed--was to watch your kids prosper, and to leave them a comfortable inheritance.

The Democrats have absolutely, totally ensured that the million or so you've amassed (net worth, including your home) will be worth about a thousand bucks in actual buying power by the time you leave this life.

"WAIT...WHAT??!  HOW?"

Because hyperinflation.  By four years from now the Dems will have borrowed literally an extra ten TRILLION to keep themselves in power.  The Chinese know this (as does anyone with an IQ above room temperature.)  As they stop buying Treasury bills (IOU's from the gruberment) the fed will start printing even more currency and inflation will begin skyrocketing.  Of course you should have known that.  Google "Weimar Republic."  Google "inflation rate in Venezuela."

Don't feel guilty:  It's not your fault that you couldn't stop this.  You trusted your so-called "representatives" to be honest, to do the right thing.  They didn't.  Instead they eagerly jumped on the bandwagon of eternal power, eternal re-election.

Now the Dems have ensured that even if you vote against them, it won't matter.

Is this one-party-rule cool or what?  Thanks, Democrats!