If even the Supreme Court won't uphold laws, clearly the U.S. is effectively no longer "a nation of laws"

Today the supreme court again refused--without a word of explanation--to hear several more cases alleging election fraud (in four swing states).  Prompted me to note a few points:

The SCOTUS is just one more part of the swamp.  Virtually every decision it makes follows Leftist political goals, regardless of the Constitution or state law.  The Constitution is totally ignored in favor of political correctness.  Its provisions are streatched beyond recognition.  Once one unconstitutional precedent is set into LAW by a court ruling, it sets the stage for dozens of further violations in the future, all based on "following precedent"–except, of course, when it is politically desirable to defy precedent to curry favor with a specific voting bloc.

For example, the Constitution specifically charges the president with enforcing immigration law, yet cunning leftist attorneys know how to appeal to corrupt leftist judges to produce a RULING that takes that authority away from the president. 

When the Constitution specifically charges the president with the duty to enforce immigration laws, what legal theory empowers the court to take away that duty?  Simple:  Find a judge who'll give the Left the RULING it wants?

It's this repeated disregard of the Constitution that leads me to doubt that under a Democrat-ruled government (which we'll have in ten days), the court would block a move to effectively make it impossible for civilians to own guns.  Of course the Dems are clever enough to avoid "flag words" like "confiscation," but they'll impose such harsh penalties that 97 percent of Americans will simply shrug and turn over their guns.

In every country that's seized civilian guns, things haven't worked out well for the citizens.

At this point it would seem that the American experiment--as a system of laws that must not violate the Constitution--has failed.