NY Times editorial: "it's been 36 years since a man and a woman ran together on a Democratic ticket"

One of the oldest propagandists in the Times' stable is a leftist named Maureen Dowd.  And on Saturday, the invaluable Maureen--taking her orders from the talking points of the Democrat party gushing about the faaabulous pick of Harris for VP-- wrote an editorial, touting how absolutely unique and ground-breaking and faaabulous the pick was.

Here's how she described the Biden-Harris ticket:

Interestingly, one woman from New York took issue with Dowd:  Hilliary-something.

Hard to believe Dowd could have forgotten Hilliary completely in just four years.  But then again, I gather her loss was rather...stunning for Democrats, so there's that.


The Times later replaced the original tweet with "It’s hard to fathom, but it has been 36 years since a man chose to put a woman on the Democratic ticket with him,"  Yeah, better.

But even the correction was brazenly wrong:

2. The NYT’s poorly worded correction manages to erase Sarah Palin. pic.twitter.com/c6CqkcwFIi

— Yashar Ali 🐘 (@yashar) August 8, 2020

 
===

In other Hilliary news, Hilliary says she's ready to serve in the inevitable Biden administration.  So since she did SUCH a faaabulous job as Obozo's Secretary of State, Team Biden has immediately started moves to nominate her for that post when he's elected--as every single mainstream media poll says is absolutely certain.

However, other strategists think she'd be more valuable as ambassador to Russia, since she'd be able to get Russian vodka cheap.