Why do more women vote Democrat?
In every poll of Americans, more women vote Democrat, and more men vote GOP--a pattern that's been true for at least 30 years. Dems poll particularly well with women under 30, and single women.
I've never found any survey or poll asking these women why they prefer Dem candidates so strongly, but one could hazard a guess: Single women who aren't Hahvahd grads and aren't wealthy love a political party that promises to give them everything they need.
If you're new to politics that would be the Democrat party.
Security, baby. Most women want it, and the leaders of the Democrat party offer it.
The leadership of the Democrat party--mainly Ivy-league grads, trust-fund babies--paid attention in Psych-101. They know 90% of single women are looking for security. In "ancient times"--40 years ago--women got security by marrying the most competent, highly motivated man they could.
But about 40 years ago socialists started pushing the idea that it was far more exciting for a woman to be "out in the working world." By which, of course, they meant the executive suite, or congress, or as editors or staffers with a cool, trendy fashion magazine, or a political mag like HuffPo or Vox or Slate or Politico or Vogue or The Atlantic or New York Times Magazine or...you get it.
Cuz if you're a hard-charging, independent woman--and particularly if you're an Ivy grad--who needs a man, right?
(Let me quickly add here that lots of males don't seem to be worth a damn, so there's that.)
So what do you think happens when the gruberment (government; gruberment is a play on a ghastly POS named Jon Gruber, who repeatedly lied about Obamacare to get Americans to accept it) provides everything a young woman needs?
Well, the number of families drops--which will reduce the percentage of native-born Americans. Is that good or bad? Depends on your point of view, I guess.
I've never found any survey or poll asking these women why they prefer Dem candidates so strongly, but one could hazard a guess: Single women who aren't Hahvahd grads and aren't wealthy love a political party that promises to give them everything they need.
If you're new to politics that would be the Democrat party.
Security, baby. Most women want it, and the leaders of the Democrat party offer it.
The leadership of the Democrat party--mainly Ivy-league grads, trust-fund babies--paid attention in Psych-101. They know 90% of single women are looking for security. In "ancient times"--40 years ago--women got security by marrying the most competent, highly motivated man they could.
But about 40 years ago socialists started pushing the idea that it was far more exciting for a woman to be "out in the working world." By which, of course, they meant the executive suite, or congress, or as editors or staffers with a cool, trendy fashion magazine, or a political mag like HuffPo or Vox or Slate or Politico or Vogue or The Atlantic or New York Times Magazine or...you get it.
Cuz if you're a hard-charging, independent woman--and particularly if you're an Ivy grad--who needs a man, right?
(Let me quickly add here that lots of males don't seem to be worth a damn, so there's that.)
So what do you think happens when the gruberment (government; gruberment is a play on a ghastly POS named Jon Gruber, who repeatedly lied about Obamacare to get Americans to accept it) provides everything a young woman needs?
Well, the number of families drops--which will reduce the percentage of native-born Americans. Is that good or bad? Depends on your point of view, I guess.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home