Saturday, August 5

FBI email shows collusion between media and DOJ to hide 2016 meeting betw Clinton & Lynch

If true, this is huge.

Yesterday, in response to a Freedom of Information Act request, the FBI released a new batch of emails that appear to show collusion between the media and the DOJ to suppress word of the 2016 meeting between Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton on the airport parking ramp in Phoenix, AZ.

That's not the big part.  The more important part is that when an earlier FOIA request asked for the same documents, then-FBI director James Comey reportedly said the FBI had no documents at all concerning this meeting.

So, Comey, why did your people--Obama agents to the last man--lie in response to the earlier request, eh?   Could it be that since you were working for Hilliary, you didn't want to admit such a meeting took place? 

Cuz if you said the FBI had no records about it, it would be easy for the Lying Media to ignore it, right?  That would enable Hilliary's people to debunk reports of the meeting by websites and bloggers as just another "vast right-wing conspiracy" against the poor, poor Clintons, eh?

Comey, you're a lying crapweasel.  We all know it.  You've done more damage to the FBI than anyone could have imagined.  I'd say I hope it keeps you from sleeping at night but I suspect this was actually intentional.

Here's what the American Center for Law and Justice (whose request triggered the release) said:
First, Comey's FBI lied to us. Last July, we sent FOIA requests to both the Comey FBI and the Lynch DOJ asking for any documents related to the Clinton Lynch plane meeting. The FBI... replied that “No records responsive to your request were located.”

But today we received hundreds of pages of documents from the DOJ [now headed by the far more honest Jeff Sessions instead of Lyin' Loretta Lynch], including several emails from the FBI to DOJ officials concerning that meeting.  One, with the subject line “FLAG”, was about “flag[ing] a story . . . about a casual, unscheduled meeting between former president Bill Clinton and the AG.” The DOJ official provides “our talkers [DOJ talking points] on this.”
If the meeting between Obama's attorney-general and Bill Clinton--just prior to Comey's decision not to prosecute Hilliary--was indeed an accident, why did the DOJ have "talkers"--shorthand for talking points, which are propaganda disseminated to deflect questions--already prepared? 
 
It's also significant that the talking points themselves were "redacted" (blacked out).  Under what possible legal exemption?  Discussions about Attorney-General Lynch’s ethically questionable meeting with former President Clinton during her investigation into Hillary Clinton clearly has nothing to do with any rule making process, nor with "executive privilege," which covers advice given to the president by administration officials.  Someone needs to hit the courts harder on this.

There is also clear evidence that the mainstream media was colluding with the DOJ to bury the story of the meeting.  Washington Post reporter Matt Zapotowsky emailed the DOJ to say “I’m hoping I can put it to rest.”  The same reporter, interacting with the DOJ spin team, implemented specific DOJ requests to change his story to portray Lynch in a more favorable light.
 
A New York Times reporter apologetically told the Obama DOJ that he was being “pressed into service” to have to cover the story.  As the story was breaking, DOJ press officials tried to downplay the story, stating “I also talked to the ABC producer, who noted that they aren’t interested, even if Fox runs with it.”
Finally, someone at DOJ has redacted all the talking points, discussions of talking points, a statement on the meeting that was apparently never delivered because there was not enough media coverage on the meeting, and its substantive discussions with the FBI on the matter. They absurdly claim the “deliberative process exemption” to FOIA, which is only supposed to apply to agency rulemaking processes.

We will be taking these redactions back to federal court. The law is on our side. We will keep pressing on with our investigation of former Attorney General Lynch until we get to the bottom of this.
Congratulations to ACLJ for ferreting this out.  Hopefully more pressure--and an honest president instead of the communist Muslim emperor--will get the whole thing out for the American public to smell.
 

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home