Democrats and U.S. Media parrot Iran's claims that they won on all points

SO...supposedly the mullahs have finally agreed to "a deal" to end the fighting, eh?

Of course U.S. Democrats--who a moment ago were absolutely SCREAMING that it was just AWFUL that the U.S. military was hitting Iran have NOW instantly pivoted to "Trump has made a FAR WORSE deal than ouah sainted Obama made!

 See, you stupid deplorables, under Saint Obama's agreement--grandly called the "JCPOA"--Iran agreed not to build atom bombs!  Reeeeally!  And they were, like, *totally* not developing one!  Reeeally!

It's becoming clear that most Democrats--while claiming to be SOooo smaahht--are actually too stupid to breathe without assistance.  Let me explain--and I'll keep it simple enough that even a Democrat voter can understand it:

1. Do you admit that less than one percent of "natural" uranium is useful for "fast fission"?  (0.7%, if you were curious.)
2. Do you agree that to make uranium useful for either powerplants or bombs, the percentage of uranium that will do "fast fission" must be increased, and that this is called "enrichment"?
3. Do you agree that Iran has repeatedly claimed they were only "enriching" uranium to fuel nuclear generating plants?
4. What percentage of "uranium enrichment" does it take to fuel a nuclear reactor for electric power?  Answer: ten percent.  Look it up.
5. Did Iranian negotiators brag to the U.S. team (apparently trying to intimidate us) that they had already produced 447 kg (about a thousand pounds) of uranium "enriched to 60%"? 
6. Is there any known use for uranium enriched to 60% fissionable *OTHER THAN* an atomic bomb?  Answer: There is no other known use for enriching U past 10%. 

SO...unless you dispute one of the questions above, then under what the Lying Mainstream Media and every shithead Dem congresswhore repeatedly bleated was a "faaabulous" deal negotiated by the treasonous Muslim shithead Obozo, the mullahs were well on their way to an atomic bomb.

Now: I'm fairly confident that unless you graduated from one of the service academies, you've never studied the blast effects or design or weight of nuclear weapons.  Totally understandable.  But you need to know that some of us have studied those things.

Problem is, just having an atomic bomb, the mullahs would be able to intimidate European nations into agreeing with Iran's demands. 

So now to the alleged agreement:  The U.S. claims Iran agreed to 1) stop trying to build an atomic bomb; 2) to open the Strait to all ships; and 3) to stop funding their terrorist proxies.  So what did the U.S. agree to give the mullahs to get them to agree to those things, eh?

As you'd expect, Iran's state-run news agency has repeatedly claimed the agreement is a total win for the Islamic Republic, that the U.S. was forced to agree to all of Iran's demands, and that the Iranians made no concessions at all.

The problem for us is that the Lying, Democrat-fellating, Trump-hating U.S. media have eagerly parroted every word of Iran's claims, without a word of pushback--like saying "You'd expect this from a defeated totalitarian state."  But that's because the media WANT to crow that Trump failed--and that the U.S. was defeated.

You know it.  We all know it.  The Dems are positively giddy to be able to crow that the "agreement" leaves the U.S. in a worse position than before.  And of course the Muslim shitstain Obozo appeared on every alphabet network bleating that any agreement wouldn't be significantly better than his moronic "masterpiece" that the Media slobbered was the greatest agreement in history--and which left Iran free to enrich uranium as much as it liked because there were no provisions for thorough inspections.

Supposedly the entire current 1.5-page agreement will be revealed in the next few days.  Problem is in how each side interprets the seemingly simple, straightforward points in the memo state.

Democrats are taking Iran's version as true, and claiming that the deal will be far, far worse than Obama's JCPOA back in 2015.

J.D. Vance recently said the U.S. won't pay any money to Iran, and no funds are being released for simply signing a deal or attending a meeting. But then he discusses economic benefits Iran will receive.  Question is, where from?

The money that would flow to the Islamic Republic would almost certainly be labeled “humanitarian aid.”  Western leaders constantly give so-called “humanitarian aid” even to avowed enemies of our nation.  This is stupid, because western leaders either don’t realize that thug nations can use any money we give them for whatever they want, or they do know that and are fine with it, like dumb bastards.

Money given to an evil regime is support for that evil regime, and calling it “humanitarian aid” doesn't change that.  There's no getting around that.

The hoot is that Iran has just stated that they won't sign the "final" agreement unless Israel withdraws from Lebanon.  That wasn't anywhere in the deal.

Can't wait to see what happens. 

Source.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/trumps-iran-deal-the-islamic-republic-isnt-getting-a-penny-except-billions-in-humanitarian-aid/