A novel approach

If you had a decent education, even if you didn't take "statistics" you know the name of the curve below: 

 

If you know what this curve means, that's a good start.  If not, you can either keep reading to learn, or go watch "Dancing With the Stars" or some similar shit.

It's called a Gaussian distribution, a.k.a. a "standard normal distribution," or less formally, the "bell curve."  From it we can calculate the percentage of the population that's within a certain number of "standard deviations from the mean," either above or below.

What this curve tells us is that one percent or so of the population is far smarter than the mean.  But the same percentage is far less smart than the average.  So what does that mean?

Well, "smarter" isn't necessarily good, since people can obviously use their intelligence for purposes most Americans would deem as harmful or bad.  (Somalis and other natives of shithole nations don't make that distinction: to them, being able to successfully steal is a sign of superior intelligence.)

For now I'd like to direct your attention to the Left side of the curve.  Specifically, in nature what happens to animals who are either stupid or refuse to learn, eh?

Democrats and socialists: "Wha?  Why wud yew espek anything unusual to happen to such animals, racist?  Dey no different den all duh uddah animals, so why yew tink dey fare any diff'rent den duh uddah animals, eh?"

And there you have it--because in nature animals who can't learn from patterns are often easy prey for predators.

But in advanced countries, governments devote entire sectors of the economy to helping people survive despite low IQ.  So Democrat-ruled cities give free syringes to I-V drug users, cuz if taxpayers don't give free needles to druggies, dey wud share needles wif infected pipo, an' den taxpayers would haf'ta spend FAR more to treat more infected pipo.  See?

The logic is flawless:  Democrats believe society must protect people from the consequences of their own choices, eh?

I wonder: in China and Russia, does the government give free syringes to I-V drug users?  Bet you've never asked that, nor heard anyone else ask it.  What's the rate of HIV or Hep-C infection in those nations?  I have no idea.  You'd think someone would have some idea, but you've never heard a word about it.  Now ask yourself: why haven't you ever heard that asked?

All "woke" Western governments are committed to protecting people from the consequences of their own choices, even when those choices are abysmally stupid.  I totally understand: it's a choice.  But everyone should realize there's a price for that choice: you get LOTS of addicts surviving and having kids.  That drags down the average IQ of the nation AND costs billions.  Wokiez believe that trade-off is totally worth it.  I understand, but everyone should be aware of the price paid--and not just economically.

I suggest there's a middle ground: why not execute all drug dealers? 

Of course Democrats would never allow that, cuz...uh...reasons.