June 14, 2026

More evidence Fauci directed the lie that Covid could NOT have been modified in a lab

June 13, 2026

For three years I've been showing you emails--released by the House Oversight Committee--to and from the corrupt piece of shit Anthony Fauci proving that in the first week after the Chyna virus reached the U.S, all the "independent expert virologists" who depended on Fauci's NIAID for grant money, and studied the genetic code of the virus said it did NOT appear to have "evolved naturally." 

For those unfamilar with virology:  All known coronaviruses have long ago been gene-sequenced--and this was quickly done for the Covid-19 virus.  Turns out it's almost an exact copy of a bat coronavirus that was known to be harmless to humans.  But Covid-19 differed from the harmless bat virus in a VERY curious way: it contained four genes not found in the closest matching bat virus.  Moreover, instead of random letters in the genetic code of the closest bat virus being hit by high-energy particles and turned into different letters, the genetic code had clearly been cut, and the new, fully functioning genes inserted into the "spike protein" of the virus.  

The reason that's obvious is that all the letters of the code on both sides of the inserted genes are identical between Covid-19 and the closest bat virus.  The new genes were clearly inserted.

Finally: all four of the inserted genes made Covid-19 able to "bind" to cells in the human airway far more efficiently than the harmless bat virus.  This ability--alone--is what made Covid-19 lethal to humans.

Without getting too technical, genes are specific combinations of "base pairs" that perform certain functions.  But the odds of getting the code for a functioning gene by random mutations are like the odds of getting a straight-flush in two consecutive poker hands at Vegas.

The odds of getting viable code sequences in four places, just in the spike protein, and with each of the functioning genes making the virus better at killing humans, by random mutations, are virtually zero.

None of Fauci's experts speculated on who did it, and I don't know if any of 'em knew the Chinese army was operating a bio-lab in Wuhan--the known origin of the outbreak.  They simply concluded the obvious: The virus had NOT "evolved naturally."

Unless you're a dumb sumbitch, if it hadn't "evolved naturally" that only left one option.

Fauci knew he'd sent U.S. taxpayer funds to the CCP's Wuhan Institute of Virology, via a cunning "cutout"--Peter Daszak's "Eco-Health Alliance."  And Fauci knew that if this became known, he'd likely be torn limb from limb by enraged crowds of Americans whose beloved family members were soon gonna be killed by the damn thing.

Obviously Fauci would have done anything to avoid that fate.  So something like two days after his lead grant-recipient (Kristian Andersen) emailed Fauci that the virus did NOT appear to have "evolved naturally," Fauci emailed him back, saying he wanted Andersen and his peers to write a paper saying exactly the opposite of what Andersen and colleagues had concluded, and had just told Fauci two days earlier.

This isn't speculation: The House Government Oversight Committee released the fucking email from Fauci directing Andersen to write the paper.

Of course Fauci couldn't literally order Andersen to write the paper Fauci wanted--a paper that would directly contradict what Andersen had told Fauci that Andersen and his peers had concluded.  But since Andersen and his group depended on Fauci for millions of dollars in grant money, the implied threat of losing that funding was obvious.

So the new news is from senator Rand Paul, announced June 11: that then-director of the National Institutes of Health--a truly goofy sumbitch named Dr. Francis Collins, admits that around the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, he knew about and secretly assisted with the drafting of a paper for publication in a peer-reviewed journal, claiming the virus that caused COVID-19 "is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus"--even though Fauci's expert virologists, led by Andersen, had told him the opposite. 

The first email from Andersen to Fauci was in the first week of February, 2020, just days after the first case was confirmed in the U.S.  Fauci replied to Andersen days later, and the team immediately began drafting the paper.  In an email to NIH officials dated March 6, 2020, Collins takes credit for "helping" with the paper:

"This is work that Tony, Jeremy, Larry, and I helped with, but are appropriately not mentioned explicitly in the paper."

"Tony" is Anthony Fauci. 

The first cases of COVID-19 appeared in Wuhan, China, in the fall of 2019, near a laboratory that was conducting enhanced experiments on coronaviruses--experiments funded by Fauci's NIAID (one of five divisions of the NIH).

The paper from Kristian Andersen et al was titled "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2."  It was published on March 17, 2020, in Nature Medicine, and concluded--quite carefully--that "there is no evidence that the virus was modified in a lab."  

The avoided claiming the only alternative: that the virus evolved its ability to kill humans by totally random mutations, because every virologist would have instantly recognized the obvious absurdity of that claim. 

But claiming "Dere's no evidence it was modified in a lab" was no problem.

The problem is, if Covid-19 had "evolved naturally" from a bat virus, there should be an animal "reservoir" containing the "evolved/lethal" version found in human samples.  You won't be surprised to learn that no animal reservoir has been found.

In 2024 Collins told congress he is not a virology expert.

Significantly, early drafts of the paper had the authors saying it was possible that the virus had been modified in a lab. And in private messages--found and released a year later--the authors said "characteristics of the virus" indicated it was man-made.  Both statements were removed before the paper was submitted, and the authors have defended those removals as being "driven by evidence."

No one has thought to ask them what the alleged evidence was--because Fauci et al want this buried.

Andersen has said his team's paper was "prompted by" Collins, Fauci, and Farrar.  That's designed to muddy the waters, because again, the House released an email from Fauci to Andersen in the first week of Feb 2020 unambiguously asking him to get a team together to write a paper claiming the virus could not have been modified in a lab--exactly the opposite of the team's actual conclusion.  There's no indication that Collins or Farrar had any role in asking Andersen to write the paper. 

In an email previously released, from Collins to Fauci in April of 2020, Collins asked whether the NIH could to more to "help put down this very destructive conspiracy" that the virus had been modified to make it lethal to humans.

"I hoped the Nature Medicine article on the genomic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 would settle this," Collins wrote. "But probably didn't get much visibility. Anything more we can do?" 

Four years later, when the congressional committee asked Collins about the email, he said "I meant we should do what we can to get the truth out there, as opposed to statements that were reckless and speculative that were not based on evidence."  This is ironic since Fauci directed Andersen to write a paper--for publication--that not only totally ignored the astronomical improbability that the virus had "evolved naturally," but concluded just the opposite of what Andersen and company had actually concluded.

Fauci has angrily denied charges that he directed Andersen to write the "Proximal Origin" paper to totally discredit the clear evidence that the virus had been modified by humans.  

But on multiple occasions in 2020 and 2021 he met with U.S. intelligence officials.  This past May James Erdman III, a CIA operations officer, told Rand Paul and other senators that Fauci gave the CIA a list of experts to the intelligence community (IC) should interview, and that the list included the authors of the "Proximal Origins" paper.

Fauci briefed the National Security Council on the virus.  One of the emails just released shows Fauci writing to a National Security Council official the day after he took part in that briefing.

Fauci cites the "Proximal Origin" paper, saying it had just come out in "pre-print," "written by a group of highly qualified virologists," and that it would confirm what Fauci had said in his briefing--that the virus was NOT modified by humans.  He asks the official to "Please show it to your team."

The new emails simply confirm what should already be widely known: that Fauci lied about everything, to hide the fact that he gave money to the Wuhan lab to fund the research that modified a harmless bat virus to make it lethal to humans, ultimately killing over seven million people world-wide.  (Other sources say 15- to 20-million.)

Source:

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/former-nih-head-secretly-helped-paper-dismissing-theory-covid-19-came-lab 

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home