New York Times, 1995: "At the most likely rate of global warming, most beaches will be...

I never get tired of re-posting the article below, from the always-honest, never biased, utterly full of shit New York Times.   

Note the phrase above: "At the most likely rate of rise...MOST of the beaches on the East Coast of the U.S. would be gone in 25 years." !!! 

And as I'm sure everyone already noticed, the hair-on-fire propaganda piece above was published in...wait for it...1995.

Let's see here...if my rusty math serves, 25 years from 1995 would be 2020 or so.  And last time I looked it was 2026.  And not only are "most of the beaches on the east coast" still here, unless the Mainstream Media failed to tell us, not ONE has been submerged!

Whu...it's almost like a miracle, eh?  And you just know they lying sons of whores are gonna claim dey akshully SAVED duh Erf, by forcing making it possible for lotsa Americans and Chinese to switch to doze faaaabulous electric vehicles.  So the infinitesimal reduction in the global output of human-produced CO2 saved "most" of the beaches on the east coast from disappearing!

IT'S A FUCKING MIRACLE!!  And all due to the wunnerful wokies, eh?

Horseshit, but dat's egzackly whut de're gonna say.  Just watch.