An oddity in a video interview

Last week Fox aired an interview with a retire vice-admiral on the Iran situation.un-edited full interview on Fox with retired vice-admiral Robert Harward.

Here's the entire Fox interview, unedited. 

The real Harward is on the right. 

Notice the curious dark rectangle just above the vee of his shirt of the man on the left.  Democrat commenters quickly assured viewers that this was "simply a shadow," but were unable to say what was blocking the light to make such a sharply-defined and...interesting... shadow.  For example, when "Harward's" mouth moves, both the upper and lower edges of the "shadow" move in sync, as if the "shadow" was an inverted image of his mouth--less teeth.  But no one explained how that could happen.

Nevertheless, Democrats absolutely assured everyone that such "shadows" were, like, totally normal, happened all the time!  "Just an artifact of the compression software used to make digital TV use less bandwidth," eh?  Sure.  Except no one has shown any evidence of such an "artifact" appearing before.

The most common claim was that the person on the left was NOT retired vice-admiral Harward, but someone else wearing a mask, and that the "shadow" was the bottom edge of the mask.  As to why the alleged impersonation crew would be so totally sloppy, the conspiracy-minded explained it as "they *want us to know,* as a means of intimidation."

Now, I have no idea if this is the real guy or an impersonator, or why anyone would want to impersonate Harward.  But I did notice one thing in the enlarged pics: the eye color.  The real Harward has blue-gray eyes, while the guy on Fox clearly has brown eyes.

Beats me what's going on.  But from the clear difference in eye color, seems we're back to "Why would a skilled agency be that sloppy," eh?  What's the motive?

Source: