November 30, 2025

A well-known Brit predicts the UK will soon become "essentially unlivable." Brits are furious

In 1969 psychiatrist Elisabeth Kübler-Ross speculated that people confronted with imminent, unexpected death went through five mental stages: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and finally, acceptance.

With that background, consider the reaction by leftists as dozens of high-profile Brits have warned that the UK is (or soon will be) “impossible to live in.” 

That claim is supported by several undisputed facts:
  • the number of Muslims in the UK has soared in the past two decades;
  • most of these are illegal, crossing the Channel in boats, but the government policy continues to be ordering the UK equivalent of our Coast Guard to pick up the illegals and bring them ashore, where they get all the usual benefits;
  • even though UK law bans polygamy, the Labour government has consistently allowed illegal-alien Muslim males to not just have several wives, but to claim all of them for welfare purposes;
  • Muslims typically have 6 children per female, compared to about 1.7 for native Brits;
  • As a result, Muslims now have significant political power in the UK;
  • In the past ten years greater London has seen a huge increase in the amount of knife violence.  In almost every case the attackers/killers are muslim.
  • UK judges have been imprisoning Brits who dare to defend themselves or others against knife attackers;
  • Judges are also charging Brits with “hate speech” for making social media posts critical of Muslims.  Defendants are always convicted, and have received jail terms of as much as 3 years;

The prime minister of the UK--Keir Starmer--is a self-declared socialist and member of the Labour Party, which pushes many of the same policies as our Democrat party.  But unlike the U.S, where voters are split almost evenly between the two parties--giving us a chance of electing a Republican president--in the UK decades of generous welfare and unlimited immigration have produced far more votes for the Labour party, so the chances of any other party winning are very low.

The House of Commons has 650 seats, and at the moment Labour holds 405, compared to just 119 for conservatives.  As a result, no substantive conservative bills ever pass. 

And this huge power imbalance is unlikely to ever end, because the Labour party, like the Democrats here, has a VERY effective strategy of bribing people to vote Labour for life, by promising voters unlimited free shit.  So once the Labour/Democrat machine gets established, it’s self-sustaining.  

With this background, we return to the five stages of emotional response to death:  The post at this link at top is about a comment made by a British citizen (Peter Hitchens) who warned that the U.K. will soon become unlivable, and that anyone who can should leave now.  

The idea that a nation as old and accomplished as the UK could become "essentially unlivable" can easily be seen as a kind of death, and the instant response from so many commenters was exactly the same as the first response to death by humans: heated denial, followed quickly by anger.  Commenters were furious: “how DARE he say people should leave!!  We must stay and fight!”

Then the leftist commenters showed their true colors: "Of course I did NOT mean that literally!  We must NEVAH fight literally!  Just strongly-worded letters!"  And then you realize that if anyone suggested staying and actually fighting to save the country, the leftist commenters would have called him a “domestic violent extremist” or some similar horseshit.

The angry commenters don’t really wanna fight for their country--perish the thought!  They’re just angry about Hitchens' assertion that the UK is in danger of becoming "unlivable."  Denial.

They don’t dispute any of the facts listed above that show the inevitable result, but just deny that those facts predict the loss of the essence of the nation that’s been a fountain of enlightenment and knowledge for 500 years or so.  The denial is totally understandable.

Next comes bargaining, as the ruling pols--the sons and appointees of the ones who corruptly, stupidly, deliberately allowed unlimited illegal invasion--make deals with the Muzz leaders to be allowed to stay in office--fawned over by the Media and Labour voters--for another few years.

Next is depression.  Not among the politicians, of course, since they’ll have enough money to leave, but among those who can’t afford to leave.  "Little people"--what Hilliary called "deplorables"--will settle into the kind of head-down existence familiar to residents of the former East Germany, the USSR, communist Poland and Hungary and dozens of other totalitarian governments:  Keep your mouth shut, pay the jizya (if you’re a low-info Democrat, look it up) and hope your daughters aren’t too attractive.

Depression gradually turns into acceptance: In WW2 America could help defend the UK from the Nazis because we could stage troops, aircraft and ships on the island nation.  But after the Muzz takeover none of that will be possible.  We won’t be able to help.  The Brits will be on their own.

As far as AI knows, no Muslim-ruled nation has ever overthrown Islamic rule without outside help.  (Closest seems to have been Tunisia, which claims to be a democratic republic, but with Islam as its official religion.) 

Past wars between Islam and Christian nations in Europe have been fought mainly on land, so besieged nations could be reinforced from behind defensive lines.  But since the UK is an island it would take an amphibious invasion for the U.S. to help.

Obviously that’s hugely unlikely.

So...all that’s left is acceptance.

One more item to consider: the UK has 225 nuclear warheads.  Three months ago, socialist leftist Starmer appointed a muslim female, Shabana Mahmood, as Home Secretary, an office responsible for “domestic security,” including law enforcement, immigration, national security, and counter-terrorism. Oversees the police in England and Wales, Border Force, and the Security Service (MI5), and handles policies on crime, immigration, drugs, and cyber security.  This is obviously a critical post to the security of the UK, and it would seem to be only a matter of time before Starmer appoints a Muslim Defence Minister--whose troops would be in charge of the nukes.

Bet not one of ya knew that--because the U.S. Mainstream Media does NOT want Americans to pay any attention to unsettling events overseas.  Besides, who would ever imagine the UK could be taken over from the inside?  It’s as unlikely as thinking a socialist Muslim could be elected mayor of the largest U.S. city!  

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home