I'm done: if the only solution is Civil War, so be it

I'm done.  

The thing that finally convinced me there's no other viable way to save what's left of this poor, besieged nation was a 3,000-word propaganda piece by the Democrat-fellating shitheads at Time Magazine just after an antifa moron assassinated Charlie Kirk.  But this story has nothing to do with that.

How many homes burn down every day in the U.S.?  Beats me, but it has to be at least 20-30.  But when a *second home* owned by a low-level Democrat judge burns, the leftists at Time scream it was "triggered by Trump!"  

Not a shred of evidence, of course, but morons believe it, so...

Oh, I hear my dumb liberal friends are saying that's just right-wing hyperbole.  Well take a look at Time's fucking headline:

House of South Carolina Judge Criticized by Trump Administration Burns Down

In case you didn't get it, Time "helpfully" tags this under "extremism"  
   --by propagandist: Miranda Jeyaretnam

Police are investigating the cause of a fire that burned down the home of South Carolina circuit court judge Diane Goodstein, who had reportedly received death threats for weeks related to her work.

The 69-year-old judge had received death threats in the weeks leading up to the fire.... Last month Goodstein blocked the state’s election commission from releasing any of its voter files to Trump's DOJ-- a decision criticized by Trump's Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dillon--and later reversed by the state Supreme Court.

For those unfamiliar with the law, when a state's Supreme Court reverses a lower judge's ruling, that's usually a big sign that the lower judge violated the law.  But most Dems have no idea what being reversed implies.

Trump's DOJ had sought the information as part of his March executive order restricting non-citizens from registering to vote.

Wait...Trump didn't restrict ANYTHING: non-citizens are already barred--by federal law--from voting in federal elections!  But the Media couch this as "Trump is restricting rights!" because that enrages Dem voters and attracts viewers.  Fans the flames of their outrage so more will vote in the mid-terms.
   In case you didn't get the message Time intended, read on:

The Trump Administration has sought to drastically reshape the election system *in the name of election integrity* by requesting--and in some cases suing!--states for voter registration data to compile a comprehensive centralized database.

Note the cunning phrasing by the liberals: "...in the name of election integrity.  That very carefully-worded phrasing implies that Trump is just using "election integrity" as an excuse to do...something.  The communist Dems at Time then explain that his real goal is restricting voting rights.  

The administration has sought data from more than 30 states and has considered pursuing criminal investigations into state election officials. Critics have argued that the Administration’s efforts are an attempt at disenfranchising voters from marginalized communities and overstepping states’ constitutional authority to control election procedures.
     If the fire at the judge’s house turns out to be targeted...

"If your mother was your father," eh?   Hypothetical horseshit.

...it may mark the latest incident of a startling rise in political violence in the U.S.

”Political violence in the U.S.” y’say?  Ya mean like assassinating Charlie Kirk?  "Why YES, deplorables!  Jimmy Kimmel told Americans on national TV that the killer was a MAGA supporter.

And while the Trump administration has blamed the left’s rhetoric for inspiring violence such as the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, an attack on a judge would come as the Administration has increasingly vilified the judiciary, blasting judges that rule against it as “U.S.A-hating insurrectionists.”

"...would come," eh?  Loaded with hypotheticals.  Fiction.  But it inflames stupid readers who do NOT realize there hasn't been ANY violence against the judges.  Endless "Suppose X happened" melodramas by the breathless leftist whores of Time.

Sub-head: Political violence on the rise

In addition to Kirk’s murder last month, the murder of Democratic Speaker of the Minnesota House of Representatives Melissa Hortman and her husband in June, and an arson attack at Democratic Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro’s residence in April...

By a leftist jew-hater!

...a number of judges who have ruled against Trump have also received attacks and threats from his supporters.

AHHhh, "attacks and threats," eh?  Let's hear the breakdown, assholes.  You put "attacks" first, suggesting more of the former.  Cite?" 

 “I’m hearing everywhere that judges are worried about their own safety,"

...said one Dem operative.  OOOhhh, so the propagandist spins this to "I'm hearing everywher...."  This is a variation of the classic Leftist dodge "Some say..."

"There are people who are inflamed by the incendiary comments by the president and members of Congress about judges. Public officials have legitimized attacks on judges with whom they disagree,” Nancy Gertner, a former judge and current professor of practice at Harvard, told the Guardian in May.

When someone shoots or assassinates a liberal judge, then I'll listen.  But right now the Left has assassinated a charismatic conservative, while leftist judges are...um...being sent pizzas?  Yep, here’s Democrat shithead Dickie Durbin:

Richard Durbin, top Democrat on the Senate judiciary committee, penned a letter to Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel requesting an investigation into “pizza doxxing” incidents against at least a dozen judges.

SEE, deplorable?  Both sides assassinate pipo dey don' like!  Reeeally!  Okay, maybe "pizza doxxing" is a tiny bit different than assassination, but it’s reeeeally close!!

“Threats against judges are threats against constitutional government,” said one New York judge.  “This is a basic authoritarian instinct,” said a professor at Harvard. “You cannot have a democracy where the elected government can do whatever it wants.”

Sub-head: Trump Administration’s targeting of judges

Wow, that's a direct accusation.  But Trump can't sue because "public figure."

Less than a year into his second presidential term, Trump has asserted an expansive view of his executive powers.  As of October, Trump has issued over 300 orders, proclamations, and memoranda, many of which have resulted in thorny and protracted legal battles. Between May 1 and June 23, federal district courts blocked 94% of Trump’s actions with temporary restraining orders or preliminary injunctions...
    Critics have said the sheer amount of litigation, some of which has been brought or appealed by the Trump Administration, could overwhelm the judiciary.

Wow, you asshole sons of whores are blaming Trump for bringing the actions or appealing, when lawsuits were filed by your party??   When a lower-court judge blocks a Trump order and your party sues, that doesn’t "overwhelm the judiciary," eh?  But if Trump appeals, suddenly it's swamping the courts, eh?  Your hypocrisy is boundless.

And of course stupid voters believe you.

The Time article goes on for another 2,000 words, but you get the gist.

Source: Time Magazine propagandists  

https://time.com/7323442/south-carolina-judge-diane-goodstein-house-fire-trump-political-violence/