Watch as the lead Democrat of the seditious six does on a friendly interview Sunday

Elissa Slotkin is one of the six Democrat seditionists who made the stunning video, all gravely repeating the same phrase to our troops: "You MUST not obey illegal orders."

This set off a firestorm among Trump supporters, but Dems just smirked.  "We din' SAY Orange Hitler gave any illegal orders!  Sure, maybe ouah dear former leader Nancy Pelosi and other leaders of ouah Partei have repeatedly said Trump is both a fascist and the worst person on the planet, but we din' SAY he'd given any illegal orders...YET."

While the six clearly said "illegal" orders, the inference was obvious to anyone with an IQ above room temperature:  the six Democrats were warning U.S. troops to carefully weigh the possibility that they could expect to be given an illegal order by the chain of command. 

Of course the Mainstream Media immediately moved to give air-cover to the Democrats, emphasizing that the six had NEVAH told our troops to disobey lawful orders, just illegal ones.  But to anyone but morons, the inference was obvious, and the Mainstream Media detected a stirring of unrest among the deplorables.

So on one of its Sunday morning "newz" (propaganda) shows, ABC gave the lead horse, Elissa Slotkin, the chance to quell the unease among the proles, by asking "Do you believe President Trump has issued any illegal orders?" 

Slotkin replied, "To my knowledge, I am not aware of things that are illegal BUT certainly there are some legal gymnastics going on with these Caribbean strikes, and everything related to Venezuela."

Bitch didn't even pause to draw breath before the "BUT."  "Some legal gymnastics going on with these Caribbean strikes," eh?  She doesn't wanna flatly say those are illegal, because emperor Hussein Obozo used drone strikes without a declared war to kill hundreds of people the U.S. regarded as a threat.  Democrats didn't utter a peep of complaint, and neither did the GOP.  So by muddying the issue as "legal gymnastics" Slotkin and the Democrats (because you can be damn sure she huddled with party bigwigs to hammer out the ideal answer to a question she received in advance) hoped to de-fuse the issue by NOT flatly declaring it illegal (thus opening the door to conservatives raising Obozo's identical acts) but leaving enough suspicion in the minds of voters to hand the House to the Dems next year. 

Same with "...and everything related to Venezuela."  Trump has done nothing remotely illegal in moving ships off the coast of that country.  Even if Trump ordered U.S. troops to bomb cartel operations, using the precedent used by Hilliary and Obozo when they bombed Libya for three months--without a declaration of war or permission from congress, Trump would have 60 days before being required by LAW to either withdraw the troops (and stop offensive operations) or get permission from congress (which wouldn't agree).

 

Now: ABC is owned by Disney, and both hate conservatives and Trump.  So ABC set up the interview with Slotkin to quell unrest by asking Slotkin one question: "Do you believe president Trump has issued ANY illegal orders?"  This was the whole point of the interview: to assure gullible voters that duh six Democrats NEVAH accused duh prezzy of issuing illegal orders!  Perish the thought!  

But watch Slotkin's eyes as the interviewer finishes the question: the interviewer is way over on the left of the screen, but as Slotkin gets ready with her carefully scripted answer, her eyes are WAY off in the other direction.  That eye aversion is a "tell:"  Slotkin knows that the entire purpose of the six Dems making their propaganda piece warning U.S. troops to be very careful when given an order, explicitly saying "You must not obey illegal orders," was to get troops to hesitate when given orders.  Since "you're not required to obey illegal orders" is drummed into all recruits and officers, the cautionary clip by the six has no more effect than cautioning them "Don't point loaded guns at your fellow troops!"  It's a "nullity."

So if all U.S. troops already know this, what was the Dems' reason for making the video?  Who was the intended audience?  Not the troops, but...voters. 

The Democrats' game plan continues to be painting Trump as a fascist dictator, a king, Hitler, and the video reinforced that, by implying he's on the verge of giving illegal orders.  Nice.