Dem-fellating site Politico gives Cackles a big tongue-bath

Yesterday the Dem-fellating shitsite Politico ran a swooning story on Cackles--her thoughful, forward-looking appearance on Stephen Colbert's equally disastrous show (which was a thinly-disguised chance to plug her faaaabulous new book) and her plans for the next two years.

Of course Colbert's liberal/Democrat audience positively swooned over her.  To them she's the epitome of brilliant, imaginative leadership--tirelessly forging the way to our fabulous socialist future!

Yeesh.  And to think Americans came within 180,000 votes of having her and the equally disastrous Tampon Tim running the country!  The mind boggles.

Now the big question for Democrats is, should she run in 2028?  Surprisingly (after the tongue-bath from Politico), many Dem consultants and congress-creeps--all speaking on condition of anonymity, of course--are having second thoughts.

And that brings me to the point: Ever since 2004 Dem presidential candidates have chosen running-mates so the candidate who selected him or her couldn't be impeached.  Think about it: Obozo picked Bribem, Hilliary chose the awful Tim Kaine, Bribem chose the even dumber Cackles, who in turn chose the moronic China simp Tampon Timmy.

Bribem's handlers knew for the last 3 years of his term that he was totally senile and could never finish a second term.  But they also knew that Dem voters are so dumb that if the handlers could all just agree to lie--brazenly, outrageously--and convince voters not to believe their own eyes and ears, they could drag the Vegetable to victory.

Then bribem could resign and the Dems would get a faaaabulous two-fer: the first "black" female president.  Yay!

But then Divine Intervention intervened: bribem froze up so often in the one debate the Dems were forced to accept (to show how totally competent their candidate was, eh?) that his polling numbers plummeted.  And that, in turn, brought all the chickens home to roost:

The story is that Dem partei [sic] rulers were roughly equally divided between those who wanted to tough it out with a clearly senile bribem--continuing to assure voters that he was "sharp as a tack"--and the other half saying that even though all the primaries were over, the partei [sic] had to dump bribem and pick another candidate.

At that point there were two shining stars: Pennsylvania gov Josh Shapiro, and Gavin Newsom.  Word is that Nancy Pelosi--who at one time was related to Newsom--believed he could win, so made the "command decision" to pressure bribem to renounce the nomination.

With that done, the Dems held their convention, which would presumably do whatever Pelosi wanted.  But then once again, Divine Intervention...you know, the thing:

SO...when the congressional black caucus heard Pelosi and her allies were about to dump Cackles in favor of Newsom, the head of that grievance group supposedly said "If you don't choose Harris we will burn this party to the ground!  You won't get a single black vote."

Suddenly the true cost of what the Democrats had seen as the brilliance of choosing a VP so bad that the prezzy would never be impeached was made horrifyingly clear--because while Cackles filled bribem's promise to select a black female VP, she was totally unqualified to be president--and most voters knew it.  Which, of course, is why bribem chose her: it ensured he wouldn't be impeached.

It's certainly possible that if Pelosi had known the black caucus would force the Partei [sic] to choose Cackles as nominee, Nancy might not have made the decision to force bribem to resign the nomination.

What's really laugh-out-loud funny is that anyone could have predicted the CBC demand, eh?  One imagines the look of total confusion and bewilderment on Pelosi's face when she realized that for all her vaunted political brilliance (at least that's how the Mainstream Media always described her), she'd failed to predict the obvious!  Fabulous!  

And in fairness, even with the ghastly, moronic, untalented, charmless Cackles, the Dems only lost by about 1.5% of the total vote, so despite some pundits on the Right saying the Dems "lost big," it was actually a close call, even with Cackles.  So to Nancy, it was worth a try.

So...one more amusing scene remains: Affluent white female liberals and their husbands (if any) and their daughters--and Stephen Colbert's entire audience-- still think Cackles is absolutely faaabulous, and will gush and fawn and talk her into running in '28.  Even Politico says a nationwide poll last month found Cackles leading potential Democrat contenders with 26 percent, 15 points ahead of second-place Pete Buttigieg.  (Wait...where's Newsom?)

This is amusing, as a poll by Newsweek on August 1 shows Pete Buttigieg leading with 17%, followed by Kamala Harris at 12%, and Gavin Newsom at 10%.  But that poll wouldn't have helped Politico push their favorite candidate.

So yeah, she'll run again.  With all famous entertainers and faaabulously successful women begging her to run, how could she possibly resist?  And the Mainstream Media will swoon and declare she won every primary debate.  The CBC will scream that if blacks don't vote for her, "you ain't black," which should lock in about 12% of the popular vote right there.
 
Maybe she'll even win some delegates in a primary this time.  Question is, will the people who rule the Dem party allow her to win, or will they "pull a Pelosi" and torpedo her?

Oh, y'think that's crazy-talk?  That it's not possible in ouah precious "democracy"?  

Ask bribem if he ever thought it was possible.

Source: Politico

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/08/02/some-dems-want-kamala-harris-to-sit-midterms-out-00490186