Kaboom! Classified annex to Durham report FINALLY turned over to congress!

If you pay attention to the acts of the utterly corrupt Democrats who formerly ran this damn government (and still run most of it, even with Trump as prez), you may have heard of an investigation ordered by congress into how the "Russia collusion" hoax was created.

Durham took something like 18 months and *reportedly* found nothing seriously corrupt.

That was because all the damning evidence was hidden in a 29 or 30-page "annex" that was classified Top Secret and never released by the fucking FBI/DOJ empire, under the POS Merrick Garland and FBI director Chris Wray.

The FBI even defied congressional subpoenas demanding the classified annex.  And when the FBI did defy congress, no one was fired.  Let that sink in for a minute.  

WELL finally... with a new FBI director and an honest attorney-general instead of that piece of corrupt shit Merrick Garland, the FBI turned over the classified "annex" to congress.  And it's a bombshell.
 
It was released yesterday (July 31), and shows that Hillary Clinton personally approved a plan brought to her a few months before the 2016 election by her "foreign policy advisor" Julianne Smith, to distract voters from Hilliary's use of an unencrypted email server in her home to store beyond-Top-Secret cables.

The plan was to claim then-candidate Donald Trump was "colluding with Russia" to steal the 2016 election from duh faaabulous Hilliary.

According to the declassified files, Clinton personally approved Smith's plan.  (Smith would later be appointed by bribem as ambassador to NATO.)

One stunning email in the Annex was dated July 27, 2016 from a guy named Leonard Bernardo [some sites spell it "Benardo"], a "senior vice-president" of George Soros's Open Society Foundation.  The text:
>>“HRC approved Julia’s idea about [i.e. claiming that] Trump and Russian hackers hampering U.S. elections. That should distract people from her own missing emails.... In absence of direct evidence, Crowdstrike and ThreatConnect will supply the media, and GRU will hopefully carry on to give more facts.”>>

"GRU" is Russia’s foreign intelligence arm.

Another email from Bernardo/Benardo says

During the first stage of the campaign, due to lack of direct evidence, it was decided to disseminate the necessary information through the FBI-affiliated…technical structures… in particular, the Crowdstrike and ThreatConnect companies, from where the information would then be disseminated through leading U.S. publications. The media analysis on the DNC hacking appears solid…. Julie [Campaign Advisor] says it will be a long-term affair to demonize Putin and Trump.  Now it is good for a post-convention bounce. Later the FBI will put more oil into the fire.

By a margin of 125,000 votes in seven states, the Dems' cunning lie that Trump "colluded with Russia" didn't succeed in winning the 2016 election for Hilliary.  BUT it dominated the headlines for all four years of Trump's first term.  It was totally accepted as true by every Media outlet and all Dems, so much that the Dem-controlled congress appointed a Special Counsel (Robert Mueller) to find evidence to support the claim.

Mueller (a former FBI director) spent two years and $22 million investigating, and ultimately found no evidence *at all* to support the claim.  But no matter: the damaged was done.  The hoax had exactly the effect intended by the Democrats, crippling Trump's public support.

The then-corrupt FBI dismissed the damning emails from Bernardo/Benardo as "probably Russian disinformation"--but did not attempt to authenticate them.  (For non-techies, emails can be authenticated or shown to be fake.)

Even before the 2016 election, the hoax was so successful that on May 16, 2016--six months before the election--the utterly corrupt former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said “Donald Trump is not going to be President of the United States. Take it to the bank, I guarantee it.”

Think about that for a minute:  Pelosi sneering at Trump is totally normal, but why would the insane, corrupt bitch go out on a limb by making such an unequivocal statement like that--unless she knew something was afoot that would totally destroy Trump's candidacy--by pushing the hoax of "collusion" with Putin?

Okay, I get it: none of you believe a word of this.  There's no "classified annex" to the Durham report.  Merrick Garland didn't order Chris Wray not to give it to congress when it was subpoenaed.  There is no one named "Leonard Bernardo" who is or was a "senior VP of Soros's 'Open Society Foundation.'"  Hilliary never had a secret, unencrypted (i.e. unsecure) email server in a closet of her home in Chappaqua, NY.  There is no Julianne Smith, who was Hilliary's "foreign-policy advisor" and later appointed ambassador to NATO.

And the story of Hunty's abandoned laptop was "Russian disinformation.  And all the pics on it of him smoking crack with "working girls" were "cheap fakes."  And all the bank-wire transfers from China and Burisma to hunty's shell companies--wire transfers congress showed copies of years ago--are fake.  And the Ukrainian energy company Burisma never paid hunty $83,333.33 per month to be on their board of directors.  (Strange amount, eh?  We have the bank-wire transfers; multiply that by 12 and let me know what you get.)

You have no idea at all how utterly corrupt the Democrat rulers are--which means they will fight like demons in the corrupt courts to avoid being charged.  Some of this you never knew.  Some you knew but have conveniently forgotten, cuz there's so damn much of it, eh?  But go back up the list above: how much of this do you have to claim isn't true to make you feel better about Democrat rule, eh?

Have a great day.