U.K admits that they saw a stunning 22% increase in "excess deaths" among kids last year. Why?

If you're a college-age American, or a parent working every day to keep your job and a roof over your family's head, and food on the table, and to try to keep your kids from getting hooked on drugs or gangs, you probably have NO idea of what "excess deaths" means.

That's not your fault:  it's a term far out of your area of education and expertise.  So allow me:

Believe it or not, even the totally incompetent, corrupt biden regime [sorry, Saus] keeps a count of how many Americans die every year from all causes.  While the cause of many of those deaths can be argued and lied about ("CDC counted gunshot victim as a Covid death"), the total is hard to lie about.  And this total is known for every year since 1900 or so.

When you divide deaths in each age group by the number of people in that group, you get a percentage for every age group--a baseline--which says that statistically, every year about that same percent of a given age group is expected to die.

If more members of that age group die in a given year, that's called "excess deaths."  Easy concept.

Now: obviously the number of deaths is rarely exactly the calculated, expected percentage, but absent some unusual event it should be really really close--like within one percent.  And if it's NOT close, it's a clear sign that some external event has occurred.  For example, in the U.S. opioid deaths (which includes fentanyl) per year started rising like crazy from the baseline of 50,000 or so before Mexican drug cartels began smuggling millions of lethal doses of fentanyl into the U.S. across our totally open border.

So huge numbers of deaths due to fentanyl would produce "excess deaths" in the 18-to-35 age group.  A useful signal to identify the problem.  (Amusingly, the regime tacitly recognizes the "fentanyl crisis" but ignores the obvious cause.  You might wonder why.)

Now consider the experience of the U.K:  Last year (2023) the U.K. health service recorded a staggering 22%  increase in "excess deaths" among one very specific age group: ages one to 14.

Think about that age range for a minute.  What would kids that age suddenly start doing that would kill  that many more kids than expected?  Few druggies at that age.  And covid was almost never fatal to kids under 20 unless they were severely immune-compromised or had some other harmful health problem.  Was there a TikTock craze for jumping off roofs or riding on top of trains?  Nah.  And it most certainly was NOT a huge increase in "circulatory diseases and diabetes," as the socialist liars bleated.  That's such obvious, unsupported horseshit that you almost can't believe they bleated it.  They did it because they don't want the public to blame them for ordering the real reason.

Again, absent any significant external event, a ONE PERCENT change in excess deaths is normal.  For example, in 2020 and 2021--the peak covid years--deaths in the 1-to-14 age group were down significantly, presumably because they were locked in their homes.  But the increases of 16% in 2022, and 22% last year, are SO vastly far above the expected variation that no competent scientist or statistician could possibly ignore them.  

It's as if 500 pounds of TNT detonated a couple of houses away and the FBI said "Chill, citizen, it was just thunder."

Now: what do you think could account for such staggering increases in the death rate of an age group that almost never dies from covid?

I'm not even gonna take it further.  Anyone with an IQ over 90 already knows.  You just don't want to admit it.  SO...Democrats will blame Trump, cuz the covid "vaccine" was developed while he was in office.  But Trump said--on video, repeatedly and very clearly--"If you're at high risk, take it."

People under 60 rarely died from covid.  And biden himself said "We have no plans to make the vaccine mandatory."  Then just two months later his Labor Department ordered that every adult working for a company with 100 or more employees effectively had to take the jab or be fired.  And school boards across the country--all of which are controlled by leftists (thru perfectly democratic majority vote, of course)--ordered that kids wouldn't be allowed to go to in-person school unless they'd taken the jab--including kids as young as five, who almost never died from the damn Chyna virus.

Now: My Democrat friends and siblings look at the U.K excess deaths and say "Nonsense!  This means nothing, because the U.K never ORDERED their citizens--adults and kids alike--to take the jab!  So either the alleged "excess deaths" is fake newz, or something other than the "vaccine" must account for the alleged "excess deaths." 

That's a pretty persuasive counter-argument.  But in truth most Americans don't have any idea at all what the U.K. did or didn't do re the jab.  But claiming the U.K. didn't order the jab is enough to allow fellow Dems to buy it.  But in fact the leftist/socialist U.K government did virtually the same as here--while they didn't ORDER adults to take the jab, the government applied HUGE pressure via the media  to get people to take it, and to get their kids jabbed.  And as a result, the U.K. government says about 90 percent of Brits took the "vaccine."

Now: the next line of psychological defense is "Well, Americans have different DNA, so our kids won't be affected."  And again, that sounds at least plausible.  They'll pair that with "And the CDC hasn't reported any "excess deaths" here in the U.S!  So obviously your theory is wrong."

Really?  No excess deaths in the U.S., ya say?  Did you actually research that, or did you just make it the hell up--for totally understandable, comforting reasons?

I could show you the numbers from independent researchers here in the U.S, but there's no point, cuz you'd just claim it was fake newz, eh?  Doesn't fit your bias.  And I totally understand.  I get it.  Really.  So let's look at the percentage of "excess deaths" reported by, say, Australia, New Zealand, Israel, most of Europe.

ALL nations with high vax rates are reporting similar total excess deaths--on the order of ten percent--for the entire population.  And I suspect that if we had figures for ages one-to-14 we'd see numbers really close to the 22% reported by the U.K.

Okay, since what's done obviously can't be undone, you think it's mean of me to write any of this.  And if there was NOT a good reason, I wouldn't have written it.  But there IS a huge reason, and you need to know it and internalize it, cuz barring a miracle we're gonna see this same thing again:

And it's this:  Like all humans, politicians and bureaucrats make unbelievably dumb decisions every day.  The HUGE difference is that those two groups alone have the power to ORDER you to obey their dumb demands.  And if obeying those orders harms you or your kids, tough: the pols and bureaucrats don't suffer.  

Surely (surely) you all knew that biden's ORDER to take the jab explicitly exempted all CDC and FDA employees, right?  And all employees of the postal service, right?  And the topper: the order specifically exempted all employees of Pfizer and other vax makers.

You knew about those exemptions, right?  It was right there in the order.  Public domain.  Published by the regime.

Wait...y'say you didn't know that?  Of course you didn't.  But think for one second: Why would the regime allow those people to NOT have to take the jab that the rest of us were ordered to take or be fired, eh?

And why did biden's SecDef ORDER all members of the military to take the jab or be fired (as thousands were) when postal workers and FDA and CDC and Pfizer employees were exempt, eh?  Where's the logic?  Most service members are under 50 and in great shape.  Odds of being incapacitated by covid for more than 3 or 4 days are almost zero.  And yet they were discharged if they refused.

Take your time answering.  I'll wait.  (Answer: disobeying identified the members who wouldn't automatically obey an illegal order.)

Now: The chances of a totalitarian government doing this sort of thing again are 100 percent.  It's as sure as the sun coming up tomorrow.  They've already shown their true colors--and if you don't understand that you're too damn stupid to breed.

Example: By their actions, it's obvious that Democrats are absolutely determined to keep the flood of 3 million illegal aliens per year pouring into the U.S.  They absolutely will not allow the awful, terrible, mean Republican governor of some minor state to defeat 'em.  And they have the power.  If they can't get the Supreme Court to rule that no state has the authority to enforce U.S. immigration law (which the SC shows every signal of so ruling), they'll send National Guard troops--cunningly from northern states with Dem governors--to the border to force the Texas National Guard and state troopers to back down.

Like Trudeau in Canada did with the trucker demonstrations, the biden regime cannot allow anything to defeat it, because that would start the dominoes falling.  They can't (and won't) permit that.  Only question is whether they'll send in the troops before or after November, assuming they win.

But back to the jab: Chances are good that if the Dems retain the presidency in November, their CDC will discover yet another of the myriad (endless) "variants" of covid as being a deadly threat to Americans.  And Pfizer will already have yet another "booster" ready to "vaccinate" your kids against this new threat.  If you understand what you've read above, don't fall for it.  Do NOT drag your kids in to get them jabbed.

Odds of a kid age zero to 20, with no "co-morbidities," dying from duh Chyna virus are 0.00001.  Literally.  

Of course if you're a liberal or Democrat you don't believe a word of what I've written.  And of course I know that.  I don't expect any of you to believe it.  I've written this simply to create a record, so that when what I've predicted happens...