Organizations *claiming* to be "feminist" support men competing against girls in sports

Like many states, legislators in North Carolina realized it wasn't fair to allow men claiming to be women to compete in girls' sports.  So they introduced the "Fairness in Women's Sports Act," which requires that men can only compete on men's teams.

Doesn't seem like a controversial concept, eh?

Hahahahahahahaha!  The tranny mafia has been screaming bloody murder about it.  But you'd think that since 200-pound males claiming to be female can easily injury much smaller, less-powerful girls, so-called "feminist" groups would support the bill, eh?

Spoiler: they don't.

Obeying the demands of the tranny mafia, the "wokiez" who run the North Carolina High School Athletic Association DECREED that males claiming to be "real women" would be allowed to compete against biological females.  

Can you guess what inevitably happened?  
Sure you can!  A much taller, heavier, stronger male volleyball player--playing against girls thanks to the wokiez--spiked a ball into the head of a girl, seriously injuring her.  She has serious health problems to this day--partial paralysis, learning problems--and so testified to the legislature.

Eh, no big deal, right?  "Injuries happen," eh?

Now, wouldn't you *think* that so-called "feminist" orgs would want to prevent this kind of one-sided domination?  But bizarrely, they don't

Organizations *claiming* to be pro-female, like the "Feminist Majority Foundation," "Feminist Campus," "Equal Rights Advocates," "Girls Inc," "Women’s Legal Defense and Education Fund," "Trust Women," "United State of Women" and the National Organization for Women ALL signed a letter attacking a federal bill called the "Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act" for preventing males from competing against girls in sports.

What's really going on with these wokiez?

*Clearly* they want males to be allowed to play on girls' teams.  But why?  What could *possibly* be the point of allowing that?

It's to push the tranny agenda.  But again, why?  How does that help the organizations listed above that are pretending to be pro-female, eh?

When you figure that one out, let me know.  Meanwhile here's a clue: Any organization that has the word "Front," or "World Council of..," or "Global..." or "International" or "Uprising" in its name is a communist front group.

Naive Democrat: "Dis cannot be true!  Cuz deez orgs haz duh word "Feminist" in their name!  So dey haz ta be pro-women!  Reeeeally!"

Hahahahahahaha!  See, a century ago the communists realized that 90% of all people believe that people name organizations what they really are.  Thus an outfit that says it's "feminist" is actually for women.

Most people assume that the organization actually means what the name says.

It's logical, right?  And for most orgs it's accurate, since the org wants to attract like-minded people, eh?  But since bad people know that, they give their "shill" organizations misleading names.

Amusing, eh?

Thus a sham organization called the "Global Fund for Women" denounced “all forms of sexual and gender-based violence worldwide,” then condemned Israel for attacking Gaza and demanded an investigation into “sexual and gender-based violence committed against Israeli *and Palestinian* women.”

See how totally even-handed that is?  But if there has been any sexual violence (or "gender-based violence"?) against Muslim women in Gaza, the Media haven't said a word.  I expect the Hamas PR team will quickly remedy that, putting women in front of cameras to claim IDF troops assaulted them.

Gotta offset the atrocities committed by Hamas on 10/7, right?

Are there still feminist organizations that support women?  Surely there are...but you'll never hear from them.  The only ones the Media quote are the ones that support the leftist/communist agenda.

Source.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/assaulting-women-is-the-new-feminism/