More on the total corruption of the Hunty "investigation," Weiss, the DOJ and the biden regime

Evidence of total corruption at the top of the laughably-misnamed Department of "Justice" just keep piling up, even being reported by the biden-fellating NYTimes and WaPo.  But it's thoroughly ignored by the alphabet networks and cable "newz" cuz...well, why do you think that is?

The U.S. attorney for Delaware, David Weiss, supposedly "investigated" the Hunty biden case.  He dragged his feet for four years, in order to let the statute of limitations expire on Hunty's failure to file and report millions in bribes.

His intention was to let Hunter Biden off *without any charges at all*--including failure to pay $2.8 million in federal income tax, and lying on a federal gun-purchase form, which is usually a felony.

Weiss only reversed course because he and all the other insiders knew two senior IRS whistleblowers were about testify to Congress about Weiss's corrupt bungling of the supposed "investigation."  

Knowing what the IRS whistleblowers were going to testify to pressured Weiss to reluctantly charge Hunty with two crimes that would normally be jailable felonies: Willfully failing to pay taxes on $2.8 million in income; and lying on the federal firearm form.

Any ordinary American would be charged with felonies for both, but the corrupt Weiss chose to only charge Hunty with misdemeanors.

More corrupt yet, Weiss offered Hunty an outrageously lenient "plea deal" in which Hunty would get no actual penalty for either crime--just probation.  And if that doesn't anger you enough, the big payoff is still to come: Weiss agreed that Hunty wouldn't be charged for ANY other crimes, whether known or unknown at this time.  

Even more outrageous, Weiss ordered those corrupt terms to be buried in the plea deal for the gun charge, under an arcane twist called a "diversion agreement" that by federal code judges are not allowed to modify!  Wow.

This came out because the judge in the case didn't take Weiss's word for the terms of the outrageous plea deal but actually bothered to read it!  She spotted the trick of the total immunity offer and was angered by the ploy.  So in *open court* she asked Weiss's prosecutors (by coincidence a corruptocrat named Wise) if they meant to give Hunty total immunity.

Prosecutors never expected this, so were caught off-guard.  If they admitted what the wording in the diversion agreement said, they'd be confirming the total corruption of this entire deal, which would cost biden and the Dems votes.  So they scrambled to find a way to get the Media to believe the clear wording of the official court filing did NOT mean what it clearly said.

One can only imagine the mad scramble to avoid being tagged as utterly corrupt!

What they came up with was "Well, we're *still investigating other things* (like Hunty's failure to register as a foreign agent under FARA) so we *certainly* weren't offering immunity for *that*"

Now Hunty's lawyers were outraged, since the fix had clearly been to give Hunty total immunity.  So they turned down the deal--and have now threatened to call daddy Joe as a witness in the case--something they say would "trigger a constitutional crisis."  That's horseshit, and the threat is a total bluff, but pressures Weiss to find a way to honor the original, full and total immunity deal.

To increase the pressure on Weiss, the leftist rag Politico reports that Hunty's lawyers have leaked documents proving that prosecutors did in fact promise Hunty full immunity from all possible crimes that he might have committed in the past, and tried to sneak that in to the plea deal without alerting the judge to this fact.

Which means that unless Hunty's lawyers are lying, they've now proven that Weiss's prosecutors lied to the judge when they claimed, in response to her direct question, that they were NOT granting Hunter Biden immunity for any other crimes than the two tax evasion cases and normal felony of lying on a federal gun form.

These docs show that U.S. Attorney Weiss was doing exactly what everyone pretty much knew he was doing: finding a way to let Hunty off with no punishment.  He devised a clever split- agreement, with the kaboom in the part that the judge was not allowed to modify, and thus would presumably not bother reading.

On May 18 (per Politico) another of Hunty's lawyers sent two Delaware prosecutors the first draft of a proposed deal, structured so it wouldn't need a judge's sign-off and wouldn't require a guilty plea from Biden.

As part of the deal Hunty would admit he "was late filing his taxes" for 2017 and 2018, and that he owned a gun while he was using drugs. He would promise to pay any taxes he still owed, to pay his taxes on time for the next five years, and to never own a gun again. The deal would be made public, and it would also cover three corporate entities affiliated with him.

If he complied thru January 2025, the DOJ  promised not to prosecute him for anything they'd investigated thus far. The exact words:
>> "The Department of Justice agrees not to criminally prosecute Robert Hunter Biden and the affiliated businesses (namely: Owasco P.C.; Owasco LLC; and Skaneateles LLC) for any federal crimes arising from the conduct generally described in the attached Statement of Facts (Attachment A); *or for any other federal crimes relating to matters investigated by the United States."*>>

In other words, no prosecution and no need to plead guilty *at all.*  Garland's corrupt DOJ--acting via Weiss--would simply drop all charges in return for Hunty agreeing to stay clean until Jan of 2025.  (The $2.8 million in back taxes was quietly paid for Hunty by a Hollywood attorney about a year ago.)

Weiss' prosecutors seemed to have no objections.  That evening Weiss associate Lesley Wolf sent the Biden team a list of must-haves for a potential deal, noting that many of them were already in the first draft.

The New York Times story makes clear that Weiss was prepared to sign exactly this deal--until they learned the two IRS whistleblowers would testify.  This knowledge pressured Weiss to decide to require a face-saving "guilty" plea on misdemeanors--a decision that eventually blew everything up. Because a guilty plea would require a judge to approve it, and an attentive and honest judge would immediately see that the deal was corrupt.

Let's take another look at the threat by Hunty's lawyers to call daddy-Joe as a witness if Weiss didn't find a way to reverse course and give Hunty the total immunity.  Why would Hunty's lawyers think that would convince Weiss to reverse?

What could Joe Biden possibly have to say in Hunty's defense on either the tax charge or the federal form charge?  For a witness to testify, he must have information relevant to the case.  Joe can't say anything relevant to either charge.

I don't see anything *directly* worrisome to Weiss about the lawyers' threat to call Joe.  Rather, I think it's a way to remind Weiss that daddy-Joe wants Hunty to get the unlimited immunity.

The fact that Weiss tried to give Hunty total immunity and to drop all charges in this case--and to try to hide it from the court--is more than enough to get Weiss thrown off the case.  But instead the corrupt Merrick Garland has named Weiss as "special counsel."

This is beyond belief: Weiss has shown that he's corrupt, and in addition, the "special counsel" statute states that such counsels can't be part of the government, to avoid political pressure.  Garland surely knew this (or if he's that dumb, he knows it now), yet he hasn't rescinded the appointment.  How this can go unchallenged is beyond belief.

Two words:  Banana republic.

Source.

https://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=405834